You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Adrian Crum <ad...@yahoo.com> on 2008/11/21 16:12:17 UTC

Security UI

I'm going to start working on moving the security-related UI artifacts from the party manager component to the framework - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1868.

The first question that comes to mind is what to do with the security-related UI labels. Those will have to be moved to the common component. Right now the label keys are PartyXxxx. There is a part of me that wants to change the keys, but then that would break existing installations.

Is everyone okay with having PartyXxxx UI label keys in the common component?

-Adrian



      

Re: Security UI

Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
> Adrian,
> I would rather prefer having it renamed to CommonXxxxx.
> 
> -Bruno

It's a bit annoying because it's in the framework

Jacques
 
> 2008/11/21 Adrian Crum <ad...@yahoo.com>
> 
>> I'm going to start working on moving the security-related UI artifacts from
>> the party manager component to the framework -
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1868.
>>
>> The first question that comes to mind is what to do with the
>> security-related UI labels. Those will have to be moved to the common
>> component. Right now the label keys are PartyXxxx. There is a part of me
>> that wants to change the keys, but then that would break existing
>> installations.
>>
>> Is everyone okay with having PartyXxxx UI label keys in the common
>> component?
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: Security UI

Posted by "David E. Jones" <da...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
I'm for changing them. I'm guessing (and it's just a guess... please complain if this affects you!) that there aren't 
many with dependencies on this sort of label, so updating within the project should take care of nearly all, if not all, 
use of these.

Also, even if we don't now, we'll want to at some point in the future. In other words, if not now then when?

-David


Bruno Busco wrote:
> Yes Adrian,
> you are right, sorry.
> 
> -Bruno
> 
> 
> 2008/11/22 Adrian Crum <ad...@yahoo.com>
> 
>> If I rename them, it would be SecurityXxxx.
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>>
>> --- On Fri, 11/21/08, Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com>
>>> Subject: Re: Security UI
>>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>>> Date: Friday, November 21, 2008, 10:30 AM
>>> Bruno Busco wrote:
>>>> Adrian,
>>>> I would rather prefer having it renamed to
>>> CommonXxxxx.
>>>
>>> <pentium>
>>> +1.000011127834856
>>> </pentium>
>>
>>
>>
> 

Re: Security UI

Posted by Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com>.
Yes Adrian,
you are right, sorry.

-Bruno


2008/11/22 Adrian Crum <ad...@yahoo.com>

> If I rename them, it would be SecurityXxxx.
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> --- On Fri, 11/21/08, Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com>
> > Subject: Re: Security UI
> > To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> > Date: Friday, November 21, 2008, 10:30 AM
> > Bruno Busco wrote:
> > > Adrian,
> > > I would rather prefer having it renamed to
> > CommonXxxxx.
> >
> > <pentium>
> > +1.000011127834856
> > </pentium>
>
>
>
>

Re: Security UI

Posted by Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com>.
:-)

2008/11/21 Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com>

> Bruno Busco wrote:
> > Adrian,
> > I would rather prefer having it renamed to CommonXxxxx.
>
> <pentium>
> +1.000011127834856
> </pentium>
>
>

Re: Security UI

Posted by Adrian Crum <ad...@yahoo.com>.
If I rename them, it would be SecurityXxxx.

-Adrian


--- On Fri, 11/21/08, Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com> wrote:

> From: Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com>
> Subject: Re: Security UI
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Friday, November 21, 2008, 10:30 AM
> Bruno Busco wrote:
> > Adrian,
> > I would rather prefer having it renamed to
> CommonXxxxx.
> 
> <pentium>
> +1.000011127834856
> </pentium>


      

Re: Security UI

Posted by Adam Heath <do...@brainfood.com>.
Bruno Busco wrote:
> Adrian,
> I would rather prefer having it renamed to CommonXxxxx.

<pentium>
+1.000011127834856
</pentium>


Re: Security UI

Posted by Bruno Busco <br...@gmail.com>.
Adrian,
I would rather prefer having it renamed to CommonXxxxx.

-Bruno

2008/11/21 Adrian Crum <ad...@yahoo.com>

> I'm going to start working on moving the security-related UI artifacts from
> the party manager component to the framework -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1868.
>
> The first question that comes to mind is what to do with the
> security-related UI labels. Those will have to be moved to the common
> component. Right now the label keys are PartyXxxx. There is a part of me
> that wants to change the keys, but then that would break existing
> installations.
>
> Is everyone okay with having PartyXxxx UI label keys in the common
> component?
>
> -Adrian
>
>
>
>
>