You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@visi.com> on 2006/08/24 02:36:52 UTC
Re: XBean and QDox
Any thoughts?
-David
On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:25 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Would we loose that cool "slurp in all the javadoc and make
> documentation" feature? Guessing we'd have to re-implement that
> somehow.
>
> -David
>
> On Aug 13, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> It seems that nobody work on QDox since several months.
>> (see http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-developing-QDox--tf705135r1.html)
>> Does anyone know of any replacement we could use to allow java 5
>> parsing ?
>>
>> I was thinking of introducing real annotations, but this would
>> make xbean-spring
>> JDK 5 specific.
>>
>> Any thoughts ?
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>
Re: XBean and QDox
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
I thought we were using the javadoc comments exposed by qdox to
generate html docs, annotated schemas and whatnot.
-David
On Aug 23, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> What do you mean by "slurp in all the javadoc and make documentation".
>
>
>
> On 8/24/06, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> -David
>>
>> On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:25 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>> > Would we loose that cool "slurp in all the javadoc and make
>> > documentation" feature? Guessing we'd have to re-implement that
>> > somehow.
>> >
>> > -David
>> >
>> > On Aug 13, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>> >
>> >> It seems that nobody work on QDox since several months.
>> >> (see http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-developing-QDox--
>> tf705135r1.html)
>> >> Does anyone know of any replacement we could use to allow java 5
>> >> parsing ?
>> >>
>> >> I was thinking of introducing real annotations, but this would
>> >> make xbean-spring
>> >> JDK 5 specific.
>> >>
>> >> Any thoughts ?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Guillaume Nodet
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
Re: XBean and QDox
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
What do you mean by "slurp in all the javadoc and make documentation".
On 8/24/06, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> -David
>
> On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:25 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> > Would we loose that cool "slurp in all the javadoc and make
> > documentation" feature? Guessing we'd have to re-implement that
> > somehow.
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Aug 13, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> >
> >> It seems that nobody work on QDox since several months.
> >> (see http://www.nabble.com/Anyone-developing-QDox--tf705135r1.html)
> >> Does anyone know of any replacement we could use to allow java 5
> >> parsing ?
> >>
> >> I was thinking of introducing real annotations, but this would
> >> make xbean-spring
> >> JDK 5 specific.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts ?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Guillaume Nodet
> >
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet