You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@falcon.apache.org by "Ajay Yadava (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/01/11 13:39:39 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (FALCON-1735) FalconException shouldn't be caught in AbstractRerunHandler in case of obtaining Workflow engine from entity

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15091840#comment-15091840 ] 

Ajay Yadava commented on FALCON-1735:
-------------------------------------

Committed to master.
Commit id: 26531b5

> FalconException shouldn't be caught in AbstractRerunHandler in case of obtaining Workflow engine from entity
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FALCON-1735
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1735
>             Project: Falcon
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: pavan kumar kolamuri
>            Assignee: pavan kumar kolamuri
>             Fix For: 0.9
>
>         Attachments: FALCON-1735.patch
>
>
> WorkflowEngineFactory.getWorkflowEngine(Entity entity) throw FalconException in three cases 
> 1) When it didnt find org.apache.falcon.workflow.engine.FalconWorkflowEngine this class in class path
> 2) When StateStore is not initialized 
> 3) FalconException will be thrown if entity is not present in configStore. 
> I thought when org.apache.falcon.workflow.engine.FalconWorkflowEngine doesn't exists its better to return defaultworkflowengine but looks like it might not occur since FalconWorkflowEngine will be present always from now .
> Second case is not possible it won't throw FalconException it might throw other runtime exceptions 
> Third case won't occur generally but still we shouldn't catch exception and return Default WorkflowEngine.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)