You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@river.apache.org by Sim IJskes - QCG <si...@qcg.nl> on 2010/09/28 10:40:00 UTC
team building
Shall we do some teambuilding and create a chat group/room somewhere?
jabber or irc?
Gr. Sim
--
QCG, Software voor het MKB, 071-5890970, http://www.qcg.nl
Quality Consultancy Group b.v., Leiderdorp, Kvk Den Haag: 28088397
Re: team building
Posted by Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>.
I would take it a stage further. I think all discussions that lead to
decisions should be on the mailing list. It is important not just to
have everything on the record, but to enable intervention by mailing
list readers who have views on a decision that is under discussion.
If we find, for example, that a general discussion of test strategy is
turning into a discussion of River tests we should move it to river-dev.
Patricia
Benson Margulies wrote:
> Just keep in mind that this is a sensitive topic at ASF. Many projects
> have associated IRC channels. At the same time, keeping decisions on
> the mailing list, available to all in any time zone, is critical.
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org> wrote:
>> I don't see any harm in experimenting, but I don't have any experience with
>> chat across so many time zones. I happen to be responsive now because I'm
>> adjusting my sleep schedule in preparation for a trip to London. I would
>> normally be asleep for another four or five hours.
>>
>> How well does chat work when active participants in a conversation can take
>> hours to respond? To me, the tempo of e-mail seems better suited.
>>
>> Regardless of whether e-mail or chat works better, I would like a club room
>> for social get-to-know-you conversations - the virtual equivalent of getting
>> together for lunch in a physically co-located project.
>>
>> Patricia
>>
>>
>> On 9/28/2010 1:40 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
>>> Shall we do some teambuilding and create a chat group/room somewhere?
>>>
>>> jabber or irc?
>>>
>>> Gr. Sim
>>>
>>
>
Re: team building
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Just keep in mind that this is a sensitive topic at ASF. Many projects
have associated IRC channels. At the same time, keeping decisions on
the mailing list, available to all in any time zone, is critical.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org> wrote:
> I don't see any harm in experimenting, but I don't have any experience with
> chat across so many time zones. I happen to be responsive now because I'm
> adjusting my sleep schedule in preparation for a trip to London. I would
> normally be asleep for another four or five hours.
>
> How well does chat work when active participants in a conversation can take
> hours to respond? To me, the tempo of e-mail seems better suited.
>
> Regardless of whether e-mail or chat works better, I would like a club room
> for social get-to-know-you conversations - the virtual equivalent of getting
> together for lunch in a physically co-located project.
>
> Patricia
>
>
> On 9/28/2010 1:40 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
>>
>> Shall we do some teambuilding and create a chat group/room somewhere?
>>
>> jabber or irc?
>>
>> Gr. Sim
>>
>
>
Re: team building
Posted by Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>.
I don't see any harm in experimenting, but I don't have any experience
with chat across so many time zones. I happen to be responsive now
because I'm adjusting my sleep schedule in preparation for a trip to
London. I would normally be asleep for another four or five hours.
How well does chat work when active participants in a conversation can
take hours to respond? To me, the tempo of e-mail seems better suited.
Regardless of whether e-mail or chat works better, I would like a club
room for social get-to-know-you conversations - the virtual equivalent
of getting together for lunch in a physically co-located project.
Patricia
On 9/28/2010 1:40 AM, Sim IJskes - QCG wrote:
> Shall we do some teambuilding and create a chat group/room somewhere?
>
> jabber or irc?
>
> Gr. Sim
>