You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@solr.apache.org by Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org> on 2021/10/04 18:16:03 UTC
Search results priority failed using boosting
Hi,
We have following fields that should be prioritized as below
* Name (Priority 1)
* Code (Priority 2)
* Description (Priority 3)
* Short description (Priority 4)
Boost query:
bq=(Name)^50&bq=(Code)^40&bq=(Description)^30&bq=(Short description)^20
Boosting is not working as Priority3 items comes to top than Priority2.
Actual results in rare scenarios:
* Name (Priority 1)
* Description (Priority 3)
* Code (Priority 2)
* Short description (Priority 4
So we applied constant score (^=) and also tried to give high score for code (P2) than Description (P3), but that also not giving expected results.
Please guide me how to bring results in correct order as per priority using boosting consistently across all scenarios.
Thanks for your support!!
Thanks,
Thamizh
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. v.173.295 Thank you.
RE: Search results priority failed using boosting
Posted by Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>.
Hi Team,
Sorry to bother you again.
Shall I have update on this issue.
Thanks,
Thamizh
-----Original Message-----
From: Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 2:52 PM
To: users@solr.apache.org
Subject: RE: Search results priority failed using boosting
Hi Jayaprakash,
Thanks for the support.
Here we have written custom index field for 'Starts With' feature. So we are expecting results which starts with given keyword. Also Priority should be "breadcrumbtitleindexed_t" then by "Descnameindexed_t". If you see the below result set, first result is starts with given keyword ('Prothrombin') at "Descnameindexed_t" but that is less priority one. We expect 2nd and 3rd results should come at top as keyword starts with "breadcrumbtitleindexed_t"
Custom index fields definition:
<field fieldName="breadCrumbTitleIndexed" storageType="yes" indexType="UNTOKENIZED" returnType="text"> ***</field> <field fieldName="DescNameIndexed" storageType="yes" indexType="tokenized" returnType="text"> ***</field>
Query:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://localhost:8983/solr/**B_web_index/select?bq=(breadcrumbtitleindexed_t:*22QQQ*20prothrombin*22)*5E20&bq=(Descnameindexed_t:*22QQQ*20prothrombin*22)*5E10&q=((((mediacontent_t:culture*AND*categorytype_t:Testdoc)**A-)*OR*((bodycontent_t:(prothrombin)*AND*_templatename:(*22Test*Instruction*22))**A-))*AND*haslayout_b:(true))&defType=edismax&hl.simple.post=**A3C*span*3E*&hl.maxAnalyzedChars=200000&hl.fl=bodycontent_t,mediacontent_t&fl=name,rilis_name_t,breadcrumb_title_t,breadcrumbtitleindexed_t__;KioqJSUlJSUlJSUrKysrKysrKyUrJSsrKysrJS8lKw!!BZ50a36bapWJ!6C3MJMmNRV3aBiXwte-JOnXeNwvqM3_VgtM4YeQYjhBuGwDgJgJ54HXxX91nP8lD_d7UXA$ , Descnameindexed_t,score&rows=1000
Results:
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":0,
"QTime":3,
"params":{
"q":"((((mediacontent_t:culture AND categorytype_t:Testdoc) -) OR ((bodycontent_t:(prothrombin) AND _templatename:(\"Test Instruction\")) -)) AND haslayout_b:(true))",
"defType":"edismax",
"hl.simple.post":" </span> ",
"hl.maxAnalyzedChars":"200000",
"fl":"name, Desc_name_t,breadcrumb_title_t,breadcrumbtitleindexed_t, Descnameindexed_t,score",
"hl.fl":"bodycontent_t,mediacontent_t",
"rows":"1000",
"bq":["(breadcrumbtitleindexed_t:\"QQQ prothrombin\")^20",
"(Descnameindexed_t:\"QQQ prothrombin\")^10",
"(Descnameindexed_t:\"QQQ prothrombin\")^10"]}},
"response":{"numFound":13627,"start":0,"maxScore":160.02832,"docs":[
{
"breadcrumb_title_t":"PT",
"breadcrumbtitleindexed_t":"QQQ PT",
"Desc_name_t":"Prothrombin Time",
"name":"PT",
"Descnameindexed_t":"QQQ Prothrombin Time",
"score":160.02832},
{
"name":"Prothrombin Time, POCT",
"Desc_name_t":"Protime (ISTAT)",
"Descnameindexed_t":"QQQ Protime (ISTAT)",
"breadcrumbtitleindexed_t":"QQQ Prothrombin Time, POCT",
"breadcrumb_title_t":"Prothrombin Time, POCT",
"score":138.15654},
{
"name":"Prothrombin 20210 GA GENE Nucleic Acid Amplification",
"Desc_name_t":"PT 20210 (REG)",
"Descnameindexed_t":"QQQ PT 20210 (REG)",
"breadcrumbtitleindexed_t":"QQQ Prothrombin 20210 GA GENE Nucleic Acid Amplification",
"breadcrumb_title_t":"Prothrombin 20210 GA GENE Nucleic Acid Amplification",
"score":102.24854},
Thanks,
Thamizh
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeyaprakash Singarayar <jp...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 11:40 AM
To: users@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search results priority failed using boosting
Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
______________________________________________________________________
Hi Tamizhazhagan,
Please share the schema definition of those fields, solrconfig and some sample docs that you indexed.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:36 PM Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am new to Solr. Can you please suggest your solution for the below issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Thamizh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 2:16 AM
> To: users@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Search results priority failed using boosting
>
> Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open
> attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Hi,
>
> We have following fields that should be prioritized as below
>
>
> * Name (Priority 1)
> * Code (Priority 2)
> * Description (Priority 3)
> * Short description (Priority 4)
>
>
> Boost query:
> bq=(Name)^50&bq=(Code)^40&bq=(Description)^30&bq=(Short
> description)^20
>
> Boosting is not working as Priority3 items comes to top than Priority2.
>
> Actual results in rare scenarios:
>
>
> * Name (Priority 1)
> * Description (Priority 3)
> * Code (Priority 2)
> * Short description (Priority 4
>
> So we applied constant score (^=) and also tried to give high score
> for code (P2) than Description (P3), but that also not giving expected results.
>
> Please guide me how to bring results in correct order as per priority
> using boosting consistently across all scenarios.
>
> Thanks for your support!!
>
> Thanks,
> Thamizh
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
> e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using
> or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in
> error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
> permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.
> v.173.295 Thank you.
>
RE: Search results priority failed using boosting
Posted by Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>.
Hi Jayaprakash,
Thanks for the support.
Here we have written custom index field for 'Starts With' feature. So we are expecting results which starts with given keyword. Also Priority should be "breadcrumbtitleindexed_t" then by "Descnameindexed_t". If you see the below result set, first result is starts with given keyword ('Prothrombin') at "Descnameindexed_t" but that is less priority one. We expect 2nd and 3rd results should come at top as keyword starts with "breadcrumbtitleindexed_t"
Custom index fields definition:
<field fieldName="breadCrumbTitleIndexed" storageType="yes" indexType="UNTOKENIZED" returnType="text"> ***</field>
<field fieldName="DescNameIndexed" storageType="yes" indexType="tokenized" returnType="text"> ***</field>
Query:
https://localhost:8983/solr/***_web_index/select?bq=(breadcrumbtitleindexed_t:%22QQQ%20prothrombin%22)^20&bq=(Descnameindexed_t:%22QQQ%20prothrombin%22)^10&q=((((mediacontent_t:culture+AND+categorytype_t:Testdoc)++-)+OR+((bodycontent_t:(prothrombin)+AND+_templatename:(%22Test+Instruction%22))++-))+AND+haslayout_b:(true))&defType=edismax&hl.simple.post=+%3C/span%3E+&hl.maxAnalyzedChars=200000&hl.fl=bodycontent_t,mediacontent_t&fl=name,rilis_name_t,breadcrumb_title_t,breadcrumbtitleindexed_t, Descnameindexed_t,score&rows=1000
Results:
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":0,
"QTime":3,
"params":{
"q":"((((mediacontent_t:culture AND categorytype_t:Testdoc) -) OR ((bodycontent_t:(prothrombin) AND _templatename:(\"Test Instruction\")) -)) AND haslayout_b:(true))",
"defType":"edismax",
"hl.simple.post":" </span> ",
"hl.maxAnalyzedChars":"200000",
"fl":"name, Desc_name_t,breadcrumb_title_t,breadcrumbtitleindexed_t, Descnameindexed_t,score",
"hl.fl":"bodycontent_t,mediacontent_t",
"rows":"1000",
"bq":["(breadcrumbtitleindexed_t:\"QQQ prothrombin\")^20",
"(Descnameindexed_t:\"QQQ prothrombin\")^10",
"(Descnameindexed_t:\"QQQ prothrombin\")^10"]}},
"response":{"numFound":13627,"start":0,"maxScore":160.02832,"docs":[
{
"breadcrumb_title_t":"PT",
"breadcrumbtitleindexed_t":"QQQ PT",
"Desc_name_t":"Prothrombin Time",
"name":"PT",
"Descnameindexed_t":"QQQ Prothrombin Time",
"score":160.02832},
{
"name":"Prothrombin Time, POCT",
"Desc_name_t":"Protime (ISTAT)",
"Descnameindexed_t":"QQQ Protime (ISTAT)",
"breadcrumbtitleindexed_t":"QQQ Prothrombin Time, POCT",
"breadcrumb_title_t":"Prothrombin Time, POCT",
"score":138.15654},
{
"name":"Prothrombin 20210 GA GENE Nucleic Acid Amplification",
"Desc_name_t":"PT 20210 (REG)",
"Descnameindexed_t":"QQQ PT 20210 (REG)",
"breadcrumbtitleindexed_t":"QQQ Prothrombin 20210 GA GENE Nucleic Acid Amplification",
"breadcrumb_title_t":"Prothrombin 20210 GA GENE Nucleic Acid Amplification",
"score":102.24854},
Thanks,
Thamizh
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeyaprakash Singarayar <jp...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 11:40 AM
To: users@solr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search results priority failed using boosting
Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
______________________________________________________________________
Hi Tamizhazhagan,
Please share the schema definition of those fields, solrconfig and some sample docs that you indexed.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:36 PM Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am new to Solr. Can you please suggest your solution for the below issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Thamizh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 2:16 AM
> To: users@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Search results priority failed using boosting
>
> Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open
> attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Hi,
>
> We have following fields that should be prioritized as below
>
>
> * Name (Priority 1)
> * Code (Priority 2)
> * Description (Priority 3)
> * Short description (Priority 4)
>
>
> Boost query:
> bq=(Name)^50&bq=(Code)^40&bq=(Description)^30&bq=(Short
> description)^20
>
> Boosting is not working as Priority3 items comes to top than Priority2.
>
> Actual results in rare scenarios:
>
>
> * Name (Priority 1)
> * Description (Priority 3)
> * Code (Priority 2)
> * Short description (Priority 4
>
> So we applied constant score (^=) and also tried to give high score
> for code (P2) than Description (P3), but that also not giving expected results.
>
> Please guide me how to bring results in correct order as per priority
> using boosting consistently across all scenarios.
>
> Thanks for your support!!
>
> Thanks,
> Thamizh
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
> e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using
> or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in
> error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
> permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.
> v.173.295 Thank you.
>
Re: Search results priority failed using boosting
Posted by Jeyaprakash Singarayar <jp...@gmail.com>.
Hi Tamizhazhagan,
Please share the schema definition of those fields, solrconfig and some
sample docs that you indexed.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 8:36 PM Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I am new to Solr. Can you please suggest your solution for the below issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Thamizh
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 2:16 AM
> To: users@solr.apache.org
> Subject: Search results priority failed using boosting
>
> Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open
> attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Hi,
>
> We have following fields that should be prioritized as below
>
>
> * Name (Priority 1)
> * Code (Priority 2)
> * Description (Priority 3)
> * Short description (Priority 4)
>
>
> Boost query:
> bq=(Name)^50&bq=(Code)^40&bq=(Description)^30&bq=(Short description)^20
>
> Boosting is not working as Priority3 items comes to top than Priority2.
>
> Actual results in rare scenarios:
>
>
> * Name (Priority 1)
> * Description (Priority 3)
> * Code (Priority 2)
> * Short description (Priority 4
>
> So we applied constant score (^=) and also tried to give high score for
> code (P2) than Description (P3), but that also not giving expected results.
>
> Please guide me how to bring results in correct order as per priority
> using boosting consistently across all scenarios.
>
> Thanks for your support!!
>
> Thanks,
> Thamizh
>
>
>
>
> NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
> e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or
> disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this
> e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.
> v.173.295 Thank you.
>
RE: Search results priority failed using boosting
Posted by Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>.
Hi Folks,
I am new to Solr. Can you please suggest your solution for the below issue.
Thanks,
Thamizh
-----Original Message-----
From: Thamizhazhagan B <Th...@kp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 2:16 AM
To: users@solr.apache.org
Subject: Search results priority failed using boosting
Caution: This email came from outside Kaiser Permanente. Do not open attachments or click on links if you do not recognize the sender.
______________________________________________________________________
Hi,
We have following fields that should be prioritized as below
* Name (Priority 1)
* Code (Priority 2)
* Description (Priority 3)
* Short description (Priority 4)
Boost query:
bq=(Name)^50&bq=(Code)^40&bq=(Description)^30&bq=(Short description)^20
Boosting is not working as Priority3 items comes to top than Priority2.
Actual results in rare scenarios:
* Name (Priority 1)
* Description (Priority 3)
* Code (Priority 2)
* Short description (Priority 4
So we applied constant score (^=) and also tried to give high score for code (P2) than Description (P3), but that also not giving expected results.
Please guide me how to bring results in correct order as per priority using boosting consistently across all scenarios.
Thanks for your support!!
Thanks,
Thamizh
NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. v.173.295 Thank you.