Will IVY-399 be in 2.0?

["Buck, Robert" <rb...@verisign.com>]

Hi,
 
A number of people voted for IVY-399, and in fact it is the most voted
for issue. Will this make it into 2.0? I fear if it does not, it will at
best make it into 3.0, which could be a year off, or more.
 
The reason I ask is that this is actually a showstopper issue at
VeriSign. We need to have caching resolvers in order to deploy IVY into
our production build systems.
 
Bob

Re: Will IVY-399 be in 2.0?

[Xavier Hanin <xa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Robert,

I already answered your question, but maybe not on the good mailing list:
http://www.nabble.com/Flexible-cache-management-%28Was-Re%3A--ANN--Ivy-2.0.0-alpha-1%29-tf3652025.html

Let us know if you need further details,

Xavier

On 5/1/07, Buck, Robert <rb...@verisign.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A number of people voted for IVY-399, and in fact it is the most voted
> for issue. Will this make it into 2.0? I fear if it does not, it will at
> best make it into 3.0, which could be a year off, or more.
>
> The reason I ask is that this is actually a showstopper issue at
> VeriSign. We need to have caching resolvers in order to deploy IVY into
> our production build systems.
>
> Bob
>


-- 
Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
Manage your dependencies with Ivy!
http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/