You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael Gibney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/12/15 06:58:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-8610) NPE in
TermsHashPerField.add() for TokenStreams with lazily instantiated token
Attributes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721664#comment-16721664 ]
Michael Gibney edited comment on LUCENE-8610 at 12/15/18 6:57 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[^LUCENE-8610.patch] adds a test to illustrate the issue, and a minor change to delay call to {{invertState.setAttributeSource(...)}} until after {{stream.incrementToken()}} first returns {{true}}.
It occurs to me that this might raise other issues about the way stream Attributes are cached in {{invertState}}, but in any case this patch fixes the only real-world use case I'm currently aware of (manifesting for {{solr.PreAnalyzedField$PreAnalyzedTokenizer}} instances for empty fields (i.e., no tokens) [*EDIT: PreAnalyzedTokenizer instances are _not_ reused at index time, so this is a bad example*]), and I it doesn't seem likely to be otherwise problematic.
Briefly, the other issues around caching that this raises:
1. Is there official guidance from the TokenStream API regarding whether it's acceptable to lazily instantiate token Attributes?
2. If ok to lazily instantiate, how about lazily instantiating _after_ the initial call to {{incrementToken()}} returns true? (I'd guess not?)
was (Author: mgibney):
[^LUCENE-8610.patch] adds a test to illustrate the issue, and a minor change to delay call to {{invertState.setAttributeSource(...)}} until after {{stream.incrementToken()}} first returns {{true}}.
It occurs to me that this might raise other issues about the way stream Attributes are cached in {{invertState}}, but in any case this patch fixes the only real-world use case I'm currently aware of (manifesting for {{solr.PreAnalyzedField$PreAnalyzedTokenizer}} instances for empty fields (i.e., no tokens), and I it doesn't seem likely to be otherwise problematic.
Briefly, the other issues around caching that this raises:
1. Is there official guidance from the TokenStream API regarding whether it's acceptable to lazily instantiate token Attributes?
2. If ok to lazily instantiate, how about lazily instantiating _after_ the initial call to {{incrementToken()}} returns true? (I'd guess not?)
3. {{solr.PreAnalyzedField$PreAnalyzedTokenizer}} uses {{removeAllAttributes()}}, so caching is going to be a problem there under any circumstances, right? I'm going to dig into this and possibly submit a separate Solr issue for that one ...
> NPE in TermsHashPerField.add() for TokenStreams with lazily instantiated token Attributes
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8610
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8610
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: core/index
> Affects Versions: 7.4, master (8.0)
> Reporter: Michael Gibney
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-8610.patch
>
>
> {{DefaultIndexingChain.invert(...)}} calls {{invertState.setAttributeSource(stream)}} before {{stream.incrementToken()}} is called.
> For instances of {{stream}} that lazily instantiate token attributes (e.g., as {{solr.PreAnalyzedField$PreAnalyzedTokenizer}} does upon the first call to {{incrementToken()}} that returns {{true}}), this can result in caching a {{null}} value in {{invertState.termAttribute}} for a given {{stream}} instance.
> Subsequent calls that reuse the same {{stream}} instance (reusing {{TokenStreamComponents}}) for field values with at least 1 token will call {{termHashPerField.start(...)}} which sets {{termsHashPerField.termAtt}} from the {{null}} value cached in the {{FieldInvertState.termAttribute}}. An NPE would be thrown when {{termsHashPerField.add()}} reasonably but incorrectly assumes a non-null value for {{termAtt}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org