Re: Making Resource/Template Serializable

[Jason Tesser <ja...@gmail.com>]

Hi Jarkko

Did you see the last email I sent to teh list.  It appears to me that
Velocity Objects are twice the size.  My templates where 88K on disk for
about 1k of text in a string and now the same guy is like 160K.

Any ideas?

Thanks,
Jason Tesser
dotCMS Lead Development Manager
1-305-858-1422


2010/1/29 Jarkko Viinamäki-2 <wy...@sci.fi>

>
> Actual numbers are difficult to give since the memory reduction benefit
> depends on your templates. Basically in 1.6 the macro AST is stored only
> once in memory and macro invocation calls use proxies instead of copying
> the
> macro AST to the template.
>
> So if you have something like
>
> #macro(mymacro)
>
> lots and lots of velocity syntax, kilobytes of text and other stuff here
>
> #end
>
> and then in your template you call
>
> #mymacro()
> #mymacro()
> #mymacro()
> ... repeat this like 1000 times
>
> Then the internal object size of the template in 1.6 is roughly just 1/1000
> of the size it is in 1.5
>
>
> Jason Tesser-2 wrote:
> >
> > Would you be able to provide me numbers on memory reduction?  Test
> > case results maybe?
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Making-Resource-Template-Serializable-tp27372143p27375103.html
> Sent from the Velocity - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@velocity.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@velocity.apache.org
>
>