You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Unico Hommes <un...@hippo.nl> on 2004/07/01 16:10:07 UTC
JMS block
I've just committed some refactorings to the JMS block to provide more
generic support for using JMS in cocoon. Previously the JMSConnection
component was specifically geared towards topic subscription and
publishing but did not have support for JMS queuing. Also, it provided a
mix of threadsafe (Connection objects) and singlethreaded (Session,
Publisher) objects. Instead I've introduced a JMSConnectionManager
component that configures, starts, stops and closes JMS Connection
objects. This component therefore replaces the JMConnection component.
According to our versioning manifesto: "An unstable block has an API
that can change without notice." , since the JMS block is unstable we
could remove the JMSConnection component. But perhaps people using it
in their own code currently or have otherwise objections (I also still
need to rewrite some component in the Slide block). So please let me
know your opinion about it if you have any. Perhaps it is better to go
through deprecation period before first.
--
Unico
Re: JMS block
Posted by Ugo Cei <ug...@apache.org>.
Il giorno 01/lug/04, alle 16:55, Unico Hommes ha scritto:
> Not so much an expert I must say ;-). I did see mail just when I was
> reviewing some of our JMS support and I think it is a great idea. I've
> been playing around with activemq a bit and it looks very nice. Your
> suggestion certainly has a place on my todo list (which unfortunately
> does not garantee anything :-()
I wasn't certainly expecting anything guaranteed, but having had no
reply at all I was starting to think my message had been overlooked
because everyone was on vacation ;-).
Ugo
--
Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/
Re: JMS block
Posted by Unico Hommes <un...@hippo.nl>.
Ugo Cei wrote:
> Il giorno 01/lug/04, alle 16:10, Unico Hommes ha scritto:
>
>>
>> I've just committed some refactorings to the JMS block to provide
>> more generic support for using JMS in cocoon.
>
>
> Unico,
>
> since you seem to be the JMS expert here, what do you think about this?
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=108816723020107&w=2
>
Not so much an expert I must say ;-). I did see mail just when I was
reviewing some of our JMS support and I think it is a great idea. I've
been playing around with activemq a bit and it looks very nice. Your
suggestion certainly has a place on my todo list (which unfortunately
does not garantee anything :-()
--
Unico
Re: JMS block
Posted by Ugo Cei <ug...@apache.org>.
Il giorno 01/lug/04, alle 16:10, Unico Hommes ha scritto:
>
> I've just committed some refactorings to the JMS block to provide more
> generic support for using JMS in cocoon.
Unico,
since you seem to be the JMS expert here, what do you think about this?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=108816723020107&w=2
Ugo
--
Ugo Cei - http://beblogging.com/