You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net> on 2004/08/29 19:24:45 UTC
Re: svn commit: r10762 - branches/1.1.x
ghudson@tigris.org writes:
> + -0: ghudson (what's the point of putting code cleanups into 1.1?)
Because the code cleanup adds an API?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn commit: r10762 - branches/1.1.x
Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
Greg Hudson <gh...@MIT.EDU> writes:
> Well, that's why it can't go into 1.0.x or 1.1.x (where x > 0), but
> what's the value to users of not just waiting until 1.2? Unless the API
> is particularly valuble to external applications, I don't see the
> point.
Ah, I see. I had a misunderstanding of our versioning rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn commit: r10762 - branches/1.1.x
Posted by Greg Hudson <gh...@MIT.EDU>.
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 15:24, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> ghudson@tigris.org writes:
>
> > + -0: ghudson (what's the point of putting code cleanups into 1.1?)
>
> Because the code cleanup adds an API?
Well, that's why it can't go into 1.0.x or 1.1.x (where x > 0), but
what's the value to users of not just waiting until 1.2? Unless the API
is particularly valuble to external applications, I don't see the point.
(If two other people want it in, that's fine; it's only a -0.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org