stalled backport proposals...

[Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>]

First 5 backport proposals in 2.2.x seem to be stalled out... time to
push them down?

-- 
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com

Re: stalled backport proposals...

[Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>]

On 02/12/2011 01:15 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> 
> On 2/11/2011 8:26 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> 
>>
>> Thanks, went ahead and pushed them down since it's easy enough to put
>> any of them back.
>>
> 
> Which reminds me... anyone care to add a +1 or begin a discussion about
> the mod_proxy change I had submitted? rpluem and covener have given the
> +1... but I see a link to the patch in its current incarnation has gone
> missing from STATUS. Just wanted to bring it up so it doesn't get
> relegated to the 'forgotten' list :)

Because it got backported? :-)

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069773&view=rev

Regards

Rüdiger

Re: stalled backport proposals...

[Guenter Knauf <fu...@apache.org>]

Daniel,
Am 12.02.2011 01:15, schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:
> I eventually plan to submit a similar change made in mod_ssl to the
> mod_nss so that same functionality can be retained. Does anyone know of
> others out there?
http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_gnutls/

Gün.

Re: stalled backport proposals...

[Daniel Ruggeri <DR...@primary.net>]

On 2/11/2011 8:26 AM, Eric Covener wrote:

 >
 > Thanks, went ahead and pushed them down since it's easy enough to put
 > any of them back.
 >

Which reminds me... anyone care to add a +1 or begin a discussion about 
the mod_proxy change I had submitted? rpluem and covener have given the 
+1... but I see a link to the patch in its current incarnation has gone 
missing from STATUS. Just wanted to bring it up so it doesn't get 
relegated to the 'forgotten' list :)

The notes about its past are here:
Merge r1039304, r1053584 from trunk:

* Put a note in the connection notes that the SSL handshake to the backend
   failed such that mod_proxy can put the worker in error state.

PR: 50332
Submitted by: Daniel Ruggeri <DRuggeri primary.net>
Reviewed by: rpluem


* Fix r1039304 and make the patch similar to the one proposed for
   2.2.x: If the SSL handshake to the backend fails we cannot even
   sent an HTTP request. So the check needs to happen already when
   we sent data not when we receive data.




I'd like to have this patch committed for the next stable 2.2 release if 
no one has objections (and attribution for rpluem and myself if 
appropriate in CHANGELOG). Just thought I would raise awareness in case 
anyone could spare a moment to discuss.

P.S.
I eventually plan to submit a similar change made in mod_ssl to the 
mod_nss so that same functionality can be retained. Does anyone know of 
others out there?

--
Daniel Ruggeri

Re: stalled backport proposals...

[Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> First 5 backport proposals in 2.2.x seem to be stalled out... time to
>> push them down?
>
> agreed; 4/5 need real work done before there is something to vote on;
> the other is at least potentially disruptive and has had ample time to
> generate interest

Thanks, went ahead and pushed them down since it's easy enough to put
any of them back.

Re: stalled backport proposals...

[Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> First 5 backport proposals in 2.2.x seem to be stalled out... time to
> push them down?

agreed; 4/5 need real work done before there is something to vote on;
the other is at least potentially disruptive and has had ample time to
generate interest