You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by "Alberto Massari (JIRA)" <xe...@xml.apache.org> on 2009/08/13 13:12:14 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (XERCESC-1481) lax assessment

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alberto Massari resolved XERCESC-1481.
--------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 3.1.0
         Assignee: Alberto Massari

A fix is in SVN

> lax assessment
> --------------
>
>                 Key: XERCESC-1481
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1481
>             Project: Xerces-C++
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Validating Parser (XML Schema)
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>         Environment: Windows 2000, Visual C++ 7.1
>            Reporter: Bernhard Jungk
>            Assignee: Alberto Massari
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.1.0
>
>
> I'm trying to validate some xml files like the following example against a xml schema.
>  
>  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> 
>  <tag 
>     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
>     xmlns:ns="ns" 
>     xsi:schemaLocation="ns ns.xsd" 
>     xsi:type="ns:type">
>  </tag>
>  
>  The parser reports an error:
>  
>  Message:Unknown element 'tag'
>  
>  My understanding of the XML Schema standard is, that it's possible to switch
>  to lax assessment for the element-tag. This would validate the element
>  against the complex type ns:type defined in the schema file named ns.xsd.
>  My understanding is based upon Xml Schema Part: 1 §5.2 (1) and §3.3.4
>  (Validation Rule: Schema-Validity Assessment (Element)).
>  
>  §5.2 http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#validation_outcome
>  §3.3.4 http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#c-td
>  
>  If my understanding is correct, is it possible to get this behavior with
>  the current Xerces-C version without ignoring the error (which means
>  ignoring all non-fatal errors) ?
>  
>  Xerces-J 2 doesn't issue an error. I didn't try any other parser.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org