RE: [VOTE] New CVS Repository Names (was: [PROPOSAL] New CVSRepository Names )

[Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>]

What is the status now? When will we move? Do we need a maintainance window?

Carsten

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pier Fumagalli [mailto:pier@betaversion.org]
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 5:49 PM
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] New CVS Repository Names (was: [PROPOSAL] New
> CVSRepository Names )
>
>
> "Carsten Ziegeler" <cz...@s-und-n.de> wrote:
>
> > So, now we all (at least those participating) have the same
> understanding
> > and we can start a vote:
> >
> > A cocoon version is defined as MAJOR.MINOR.PATCHLEVEL
> >
> > - One repository for each MAJOR.MINOR combination
> > - Inside a repository are all patch levels. Each one tagged, but there
> > wont be any branching
> >
> > On a release of a MAJOR.MINOR version we create a new repository.
> >
> > This will lead us to currently:
> > cocoon-2.0 and cocoon-2.1 and cocoon-1 (for the old xml-cocoon repo).
> >
> > In addition we will have cocoon-2-historic as a simple copy to the
> > current xml-cocoon2 repo.
> >
> > In addition we will have a symlink (right?) "cocoon" that links to
> > the latest version, so currently this will be cocoon-2.1.
> >
> > I hope I have summarized this correctly. If so, please cast your votes.
> >
> > PS: If we voted for it, we have to set a date for the change, because we
> > also have to update our website and inform users.
>
> Given the number of +1s received, shall we do it this weekend?
>
>     Pier
>

Re: [VOTE] New CVS Repository Names (was: [PROPOSAL] New CVSRepository Names )

[Torsten Curdt <tc...@dff.st>]

> What is the status now? When will we move? Do we need a maintainance window?

I am also a bit confused - currently everyone is still using 
xml-cocoon2, right?

If we have decided I'd say - go for it.

I was offline due to some ISP problems... Do we have enough votes yet?
--
Torsten