You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ctakes.apache.org by "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> on 2013/01/10 16:43:05 UTC
[VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Hi,
This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. This will be our first release.
The main changes since the last candidate are:
CTAKES-125 - Move DISCLAIMER to root in SVN. Updated 2013 copyright ASF in Notice.
CTAKES-75 - Removed unnecessary items in NOTICE (uima, opennlp, lucene, jvinci since they are covered by the second paragraph already.) Removed items not included- svg icons, junit. added newline to disclaimer.
CTAKES-47: codes and OUI in CreateLuceneIndexForSnomedLikeSample.java
For more detailed information on the changes/release notes, please visit:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313621&version=12322969
The release was made using the cTAKES release process documented here: http://incubator.apache.org/ctakes/ctakes-release-guide.html
The candidate is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz /.zip
The tag to be voted on:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/
The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5 /.zip.md5
The signature of the tarball can be found at:
http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc /.zip.asc
Apache cTAKES' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/KEYS
Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
Only votes from Incubator PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
Thanks!
Pei
P.S. Here is my +1.
Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by Oleg Tikhonov <ol...@gmail.com>.
[x] for RC5 release!
Oleg
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Jörn Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1,
>
> Jörn
>
>
> On 01/10/2013 04:43 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. This will be our first release.
>> The main changes since the last candidate are:
>> CTAKES-125 - Move DISCLAIMER to root in SVN. Updated 2013 copyright ASF
>> in Notice.
>> CTAKES-75 - Removed unnecessary items in NOTICE (uima, opennlp, lucene,
>> jvinci since they are covered by the second paragraph already.) Removed
>> items not included- svg icons, junit. added newline to disclaimer.
>> CTAKES-47: codes and OUI in CreateLuceneIndexForSnomedLike**Sample.java
>>
>> For more detailed information on the changes/release notes, please visit:
>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?**
>> projectId=12313621&version=**12322969<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313621&version=12322969>
>>
>> The release was made using the cTAKES release process documented here:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/**ctakes/ctakes-release-guide.**html<http://incubator.apache.org/ctakes/ctakes-release-guide.html>
>> The candidate is available at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~**chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-**
>> incubating/rc5/target/apache-**ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.**tar.gz<http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz>/.zip
>>
>> The tag to be voted on:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/**
>> ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/>
>>
>> The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~**chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-**
>> incubating/rc5/target/apache-**ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.**tar.gz.md5<http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5>/.zip.md5
>>
>> The signature of the tarball can be found at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~**chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-**
>> incubating/rc5/target/apache-**ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.**tar.gz.asc<http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc>/.zip.asc
>>
>> Apache cTAKES' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>> release:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/**
>> ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/**KEYS<http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/KEYS>
>>
>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache cTAKES
>> 3.0.0-incubating. The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
>> Only votes from Incubator PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check
>> the release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote
>> passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating
>> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>> Thanks!
>> Pei
>> P.S. Here is my +1.
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by Jörn Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
+1,
Jörn
On 01/10/2013 04:43 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. This will be our first release.
> The main changes since the last candidate are:
> CTAKES-125 - Move DISCLAIMER to root in SVN. Updated 2013 copyright ASF in Notice.
> CTAKES-75 - Removed unnecessary items in NOTICE (uima, opennlp, lucene, jvinci since they are covered by the second paragraph already.) Removed items not included- svg icons, junit. added newline to disclaimer.
> CTAKES-47: codes and OUI in CreateLuceneIndexForSnomedLikeSample.java
>
> For more detailed information on the changes/release notes, please visit:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313621&version=12322969
>
> The release was made using the cTAKES release process documented here: http://incubator.apache.org/ctakes/ctakes-release-guide.html
> The candidate is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz /.zip
>
> The tag to be voted on:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/
>
> The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5 /.zip.md5
>
> The signature of the tarball can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc /.zip.asc
>
> Apache cTAKES' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
> Only votes from Incubator PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> Thanks!
> Pei
> P.S. Here is my +1.
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu>.
Sorry was away the weekend.
Closed this issue now per comment:
Since it's been more than 48 hours, by lazy consensus, cTAKES will proceed with including the index of word counts derived from some wikipedia articles.
________________________________________
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 10:24 PM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Ahh OK James, sorry forgot Pei opened it.
Pei, can you please close it?
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/19/13 6:49 PM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>I don't have access to close the LEGAL issue that Pei opened. Am I
>supposed to get that or is that limited to some subgroup of Apache
>committers
>
>________________________________________
>From: ctakes-dev-return-1067-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>[ctakes-dev-return-1067-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] on
>behalf of Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
>Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:30 PM
>To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>
>Great job! Feel free to close the LEGAL issue now.
>
>On 1/19/13 11:53 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>
>>Now that 48 hours passed since I added the comment to LEGAL-154 about
>>lazy consensus, I've added another comment that cTAKES will proceed by
>>lazy consensus with including the index of words and word counts.
>>
>>-- James
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.or
>>>g
>>>]
>>> On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:40 AM
>>> To: 'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>>
>>> Thanks Chris!
>>> I added such a comment to LEGAL-154.
>>>
>>> -- James
>>>
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From:
>>> > ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>> >
>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>>> > org]
>>> > On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>>> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM
>>> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>> >
>>> > Hi James,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >Pei had opened LEGAL-154
>>> > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
>>> > >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the
>>> > >intended use seemed ok to him.
>>> > >
>>> > >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be
>>> > >considered 'cleared'?
>>> >
>>> > Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus,
>>> > you are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections
>>> > that everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will
>>> proceed.
>>> >
>>> > In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours,
>>> > Jukka and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Chris
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >Thanks,
>>> > >James Masanz
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> From:
>>> > >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>>> > >>org
>>> > >>]
>>> > >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
>>> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
>>> > >> To: ctakes-dev
>>> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hi,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
>>> > >> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>> > >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate
>>>as
>>> > >>Apache
>>> > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +0
>>> > >>
>>> > >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable
>>>voting
>>> > >>+1 if the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented
>>>better
>>> > >>and ideally cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about
>>> > >>the data falling under the normal contributor license sounds
>>> > >>convincing, but I'm not intimate enough with copyright law to be
>>> > >>able to tell whether those files could instead be interpreted as
>>> > >>derivative works of the upstream data and thus constrained by the
>>> upstream license.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> BR,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Jukka Zitting
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Ahh OK James, sorry forgot Pei opened it.
Pei, can you please close it?
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/19/13 6:49 PM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>Hi Chris,
>
>I don't have access to close the LEGAL issue that Pei opened. Am I
>supposed to get that or is that limited to some subgroup of Apache
>committers
>
>________________________________________
>From: ctakes-dev-return-1067-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>[ctakes-dev-return-1067-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] on
>behalf of Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
>Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:30 PM
>To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>
>Great job! Feel free to close the LEGAL issue now.
>
>On 1/19/13 11:53 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>
>>Now that 48 hours passed since I added the comment to LEGAL-154 about
>>lazy consensus, I've added another comment that cTAKES will proceed by
>>lazy consensus with including the index of words and word counts.
>>
>>-- James
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.or
>>>g
>>>]
>>> On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:40 AM
>>> To: 'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>>
>>> Thanks Chris!
>>> I added such a comment to LEGAL-154.
>>>
>>> -- James
>>>
>>>
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From:
>>> > ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>> >
>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>>> > org]
>>> > On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>>> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM
>>> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>> >
>>> > Hi James,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >Pei had opened LEGAL-154
>>> > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
>>> > >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the
>>> > >intended use seemed ok to him.
>>> > >
>>> > >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be
>>> > >considered 'cleared'?
>>> >
>>> > Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus,
>>> > you are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections
>>> > that everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will
>>> proceed.
>>> >
>>> > In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours,
>>> > Jukka and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Chris
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >Thanks,
>>> > >James Masanz
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>>> > >> From:
>>> > >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>>> > >>org
>>> > >>]
>>> > >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
>>> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
>>> > >> To: ctakes-dev
>>> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hi,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
>>> > >> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>> > >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate
>>>as
>>> > >>Apache
>>> > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +0
>>> > >>
>>> > >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable
>>>voting
>>> > >>+1 if the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented
>>>better
>>> > >>and ideally cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about
>>> > >>the data falling under the normal contributor license sounds
>>> > >>convincing, but I'm not intimate enough with copyright law to be
>>> > >>able to tell whether those files could instead be interpreted as
>>> > >>derivative works of the upstream data and thus constrained by the
>>> upstream license.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> BR,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Jukka Zitting
>>
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu>.
Hi Chris,
I don't have access to close the LEGAL issue that Pei opened. Am I supposed to get that or is that limited to some subgroup of Apache committers
________________________________________
From: ctakes-dev-return-1067-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org [ctakes-dev-return-1067-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org] on behalf of Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 2:30 PM
To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Great job! Feel free to close the LEGAL issue now.
On 1/19/13 11:53 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>Now that 48 hours passed since I added the comment to LEGAL-154 about
>lazy consensus, I've added another comment that cTAKES will proceed by
>lazy consensus with including the index of words and word counts.
>
>-- James
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>]
>> On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:40 AM
>> To: 'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>
>> Thanks Chris!
>> I added such a comment to LEGAL-154.
>>
>> -- James
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From:
>> > ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>> > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>> > org]
>> > On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM
>> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>> >
>> > Hi James,
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Pei had opened LEGAL-154
>> > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
>> > >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the
>> > >intended use seemed ok to him.
>> > >
>> > >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be
>> > >considered 'cleared'?
>> >
>> > Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus,
>> > you are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections
>> > that everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will
>> proceed.
>> >
>> > In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours,
>> > Jukka and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Chris
>> >
>> > >
>> > >Thanks,
>> > >James Masanz
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From:
>> > >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>> > >>
>> >
>>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>> > >>org
>> > >>]
>> > >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
>> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
>> > >> To: ctakes-dev
>> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
>> > >> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> > >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
>> > >>Apache
>> > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
>> > >>
>> > >> +0
>> > >>
>> > >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting
>> > >>+1 if the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better
>> > >>and ideally cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about
>> > >>the data falling under the normal contributor license sounds
>> > >>convincing, but I'm not intimate enough with copyright law to be
>> > >>able to tell whether those files could instead be interpreted as
>> > >>derivative works of the upstream data and thus constrained by the
>> upstream license.
>> > >>
>> > >> BR,
>> > >>
>> > >> Jukka Zitting
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Great job! Feel free to close the LEGAL issue now.
On 1/19/13 11:53 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>Now that 48 hours passed since I added the comment to LEGAL-154 about
>lazy consensus, I've added another comment that cTAKES will proceed by
>lazy consensus with including the index of words and word counts.
>
>-- James
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>]
>> On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:40 AM
>> To: 'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>
>> Thanks Chris!
>> I added such a comment to LEGAL-154.
>>
>> -- James
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From:
>> > ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>> > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>> > org]
>> > On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM
>> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>> >
>> > Hi James,
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Pei had opened LEGAL-154
>> > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
>> > >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the
>> > >intended use seemed ok to him.
>> > >
>> > >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be
>> > >considered 'cleared'?
>> >
>> > Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus,
>> > you are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections
>> > that everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will
>> proceed.
>> >
>> > In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours,
>> > Jukka and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Chris
>> >
>> > >
>> > >Thanks,
>> > >James Masanz
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From:
>> > >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>> > >>
>> >
>>>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
>> > >>org
>> > >>]
>> > >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
>> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
>> > >> To: ctakes-dev
>> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi,
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
>> > >> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> > >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
>> > >>Apache
>> > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
>> > >>
>> > >> +0
>> > >>
>> > >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting
>> > >>+1 if the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better
>> > >>and ideally cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about
>> > >>the data falling under the normal contributor license sounds
>> > >>convincing, but I'm not intimate enough with copyright law to be
>> > >>able to tell whether those files could instead be interpreted as
>> > >>derivative works of the upstream data and thus constrained by the
>> upstream license.
>> > >>
>> > >> BR,
>> > >>
>> > >> Jukka Zitting
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu>.
Now that 48 hours passed since I added the comment to LEGAL-154 about lazy consensus, I've added another comment that cTAKES will proceed by lazy consensus with including the index of words and word counts.
-- James
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org]
> On Behalf Of Masanz, James J.
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:40 AM
> To: 'ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>
> Thanks Chris!
> I added such a comment to LEGAL-154.
>
> -- James
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
> > org]
> > On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM
> > To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> >
> > On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
> >
> > >Pei had opened LEGAL-154
> > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
> > >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the
> > >intended use seemed ok to him.
> > >
> > >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be
> > >considered 'cleared'?
> >
> > Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus,
> > you are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections
> > that everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will
> proceed.
> >
> > In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours,
> > Jukka and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chris
> >
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >James Masanz
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From:
> > >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
> > >>org
> > >>]
> > >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
> > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
> > >> To: ctakes-dev
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
> > >>
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
> > >> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
> > >>Apache
> > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
> > >>
> > >> +0
> > >>
> > >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting
> > >>+1 if the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better
> > >>and ideally cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about
> > >>the data falling under the normal contributor license sounds
> > >>convincing, but I'm not intimate enough with copyright law to be
> > >>able to tell whether those files could instead be interpreted as
> > >>derivative works of the upstream data and thus constrained by the
> upstream license.
> > >>
> > >> BR,
> > >>
> > >> Jukka Zitting
RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu>.
Thanks Chris!
I added such a comment to LEGAL-154.
-- James
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org]
> On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM
> To: ctakes-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>
> Hi James,
>
>
> On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>
> >Pei had opened LEGAL-154
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
> >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the intended
> >use seemed ok to him.
> >
> >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be
> >considered 'cleared'?
>
> Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus, you
> are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections that
> everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will proceed.
>
> In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours, Jukka
> and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
> >
> >Thanks,
> >James Masanz
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From:
> >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.
> >>org
> >>]
> >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
> >> To: ctakes-dev
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
> >> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
> >>Apache
> >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
> >>
> >> +0
> >>
> >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting
> >>+1 if the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better
> >>and ideally cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about the
> >>data falling under the normal contributor license sounds convincing,
> >>but I'm not intimate enough with copyright law to be able to tell
> >>whether those files could instead be interpreted as derivative works
> >>of the upstream data and thus constrained by the upstream license.
> >>
> >> BR,
> >>
> >> Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hi James,
On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu> wrote:
>Pei had opened LEGAL-154
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
>and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the intended
>use seemed ok to him.
>
>Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be
>considered 'cleared'?
Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus, you
are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections that
everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will proceed.
In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours, Jukka
and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point.
Thanks,
Chris
>
>Thanks,
>James Masanz
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>[mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
>>]
>> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
>> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
>> To: ctakes-dev
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
>> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as
>>Apache
>> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
>>
>> +0
>>
>> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting +1
>>if
>> the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better and
>>ideally
>> cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about the data falling
>> under the normal contributor license sounds convincing, but I'm not
>> intimate enough with copyright law to be able to tell whether those
>>files
>> could instead be interpreted as derivative works of the upstream data
>>and
>> thus constrained by the upstream license.
>>
>> BR,
>>
>> Jukka Zitting
RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Masanz, James J." <Ma...@mayo.edu>.
Pei had opened LEGAL-154
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154
and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the intended use seemed ok to him.
Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be considered 'cleared'?
Thanks,
James Masanz
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org
> [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo.edu@incubator.apache.org]
> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM
> To: ctakes-dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
>
> +0
>
> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting +1 if
> the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better and ideally
> cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about the data falling
> under the normal contributor license sounds convincing, but I'm not
> intimate enough with copyright law to be able to tell whether those files
> could instead be interpreted as derivative works of the upstream data and
> thus constrained by the upstream license.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu>.
Hi Jukka,
We have removed the models/binaries from src and bin dist in RC6 now (as there are some ongoing discussions).
Would you reconsider the +0 into a +1 in the RC6 thread?
Thanks,
Pei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jukka.zitting@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:31 AM
> To: ctakes-dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
> <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
>
> +0
>
> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting +1 if the
> licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better and ideally
> cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about the data falling under the
> normal contributor license sounds convincing, but I'm not intimate enough
> with copyright law to be able to tell whether those files could instead be
> interpreted as derivative works of the upstream data and thus constrained
> by the upstream license.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei
<Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating.
+0
The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting +1
if the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better and
ideally cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about the data
falling under the normal contributor license sounds convincing, but
I'm not intimate enough with copyright law to be able to tell whether
those files could instead be interpreted as derivative works of the
upstream data and thus constrained by the upstream license.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by Jörn Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
this vote is still open, it would be nice to get at least three +1 votes
from
PPMC members (anyone else is also invited to vote).
Please cast your vote.
Jörn
On 01/10/2013 04:43 PM, Chen, Pei wrote:
> Hi,
> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. This will be our first release.
> The main changes since the last candidate are:
> CTAKES-125 - Move DISCLAIMER to root in SVN. Updated 2013 copyright ASF in Notice.
> CTAKES-75 - Removed unnecessary items in NOTICE (uima, opennlp, lucene, jvinci since they are covered by the second paragraph already.) Removed items not included- svg icons, junit. added newline to disclaimer.
> CTAKES-47: codes and OUI in CreateLuceneIndexForSnomedLikeSample.java
>
> For more detailed information on the changes/release notes, please visit:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313621&version=12322969
>
> The release was made using the cTAKES release process documented here: http://incubator.apache.org/ctakes/ctakes-release-guide.html
> The candidate is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz /.zip
>
> The tag to be voted on:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/
>
> The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5 /.zip.md5
>
> The signature of the tarball can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc /.zip.asc
>
> Apache cTAKES' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the release:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5/KEYS
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
> Only votes from Incubator PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> Thanks!
> Pei
> P.S. Here is my +1.
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
+1 from me, Pei:
CHECKSUMS check out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5] mattmann%
$HOME/bin/verify_md5_checksums
md5sum: stat '*.bz2': No such file or directory
md5sum: stat '*.zip': No such file or directory
apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz: OK
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5] mattmann%
SIGS check out:
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5] mattmann%
$HOME/bin/verify_gpg_sigs Verifying Signature for file
apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 10 07:22:53 2013 PST using RSA key ID D218BB0A
gpg: Good signature from "Pei Chen (CODE SIGNING KEY2)
<ch...@apache.org>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: FECC 654C 4AC3 5DEC 0027 2792 F97C 492F D218 BB0A
[chipotle:~/tmp/apache-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-rc5] mattmann%
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/10/13 10:43 AM, "Chen, Pei" <Pe...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>Hi,
>This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
>cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. This will be our first release.
>The main changes since the last candidate are:
>CTAKES-125 - Move DISCLAIMER to root in SVN. Updated 2013 copyright ASF
>in Notice.
>CTAKES-75 - Removed unnecessary items in NOTICE (uima, opennlp, lucene,
>jvinci since they are covered by the second paragraph already.) Removed
>items not included- svg icons, junit. added newline to disclaimer.
>CTAKES-47: codes and OUI in CreateLuceneIndexForSnomedLikeSample.java
>
>For more detailed information on the changes/release notes, please visit:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313621&
>version=12322969
>
>The release was made using the cTAKES release process documented here:
>http://incubator.apache.org/ctakes/ctakes-release-guide.html
>The candidate is available at:
>http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apach
>e-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz /.zip
>
>The tag to be voted on:
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubat
>ing-rc5/
>
>The MD5 checksum of the tarball can be found at:
>http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apach
>e-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5 /.zip.md5
>
>The signature of the tarball can be found at:
>http://people.apache.org/~chenpei/ctakes-3.0.0-incubating/rc5/target/apach
>e-ctakes-3.0.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc /.zip.asc
>
>Apache cTAKES' KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the
>release:
>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ctakes/tags/ctakes-3.0.0-incubat
>ing-rc5/KEYS
>
>Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache cTAKES
>3.0.0-incubating. The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
>Only votes from Incubator PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check
>the release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote
>passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
>[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating
>[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>Thanks!
>Pei
>P.S. Here is my +1.
>