[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (LUCENE-6815) Should DisjunctionScorer advance more lazily?

["Paul Elschot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-6815:
---------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: In case you are not adding SpanOr here, could you open a similar issue for that?)

> Should DisjunctionScorer advance more lazily?
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6815
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6815
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Assignee: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6815.patch, LUCENE-6815.patch
>
>
> Today if you call DisjunctionScorer.advance(X), it will try to advance all sub scorers to X. However, if DisjunctionScorer is being intersected with another scorer (which is almost always the case as we use BooleanScorer for top-level disjunctions), we could stop as soon as we find one matching sub scorer, and only advance the remaining sub scorers when freq() or score() is called. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org