You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to scm@geronimo.apache.org by am...@apache.org on 2006/07/25 17:57:17 UTC
svn commit: r425431 -
/geronimo/branches/1.1/modules/system/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/util/PluginRepositoryExporter.java
Author: ammulder
Date: Tue Jul 25 08:57:16 2006
New Revision: 425431
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425431&view=rev
Log:
Remove as this is really a separate tool not part of the server
runtime environment. Plus it's not used.
Removed:
geronimo/branches/1.1/modules/system/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/util/PluginRepositoryExporter.java
Re: svn commit: r425431 - /geronimo/branches/1.1/modules/system/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/util/PluginRepositoryExporter.java
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
I am tracking all svn commits to trunk (as well as 1.1 to make sure
they get merged to trunk) to be merged into m2migration to keep that
branch up to date with trunk.
I have been collecting them in a folder and when I get enough I SVK
merge them which is really easy.
So, I'd rather you guys just commit to trunk and if your svn ci
produces a svn commit email I will catch it and merge for you.
Only stuff that conflicts will I hold off on, but I will still track
it for resolution when we merge m2migration to trunk.
--jason
On Jul 25, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Sure. For now, I figured it would be better to wait until the M2
> thing is resolved. If I apply it to "trunk" and then we replace
> "trunk" with the M2 branch I figured it might get lost. Should I
> apply it to both trunk and M2 branches? Or should I rely on your SVK
> procedure to catch any changes made to trunk and apply to the M2
> branch?
>
> Thanks,
> Aaron
>
> On 7/25/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> Apply to trunk?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:57 AM, ammulder@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> > Author: ammulder
>> > Date: Tue Jul 25 08:57:16 2006
>> > New Revision: 425431
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425431&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Remove as this is really a separate tool not part of the server
>> > runtime environment. Plus it's not used.
>> >
>> > Removed:
>> > geronimo/branches/1.1/modules/system/src/java/org/apache/
>> > geronimo/system/util/PluginRepositoryExporter.java
>> >
>>
>>
Re: svn commit: r425431 - /geronimo/branches/1.1/modules/system/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/util/PluginRepositoryExporter.java
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
Sure. For now, I figured it would be better to wait until the M2
thing is resolved. If I apply it to "trunk" and then we replace
"trunk" with the M2 branch I figured it might get lost. Should I
apply it to both trunk and M2 branches? Or should I rely on your SVK
procedure to catch any changes made to trunk and apply to the M2
branch?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 7/25/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Apply to trunk?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:57 AM, ammulder@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: ammulder
> > Date: Tue Jul 25 08:57:16 2006
> > New Revision: 425431
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425431&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Remove as this is really a separate tool not part of the server
> > runtime environment. Plus it's not used.
> >
> > Removed:
> > geronimo/branches/1.1/modules/system/src/java/org/apache/
> > geronimo/system/util/PluginRepositoryExporter.java
> >
>
>
Re: svn commit: r425431 - /geronimo/branches/1.1/modules/system/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/util/PluginRepositoryExporter.java
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Apply to trunk?
--jason
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:57 AM, ammulder@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ammulder
> Date: Tue Jul 25 08:57:16 2006
> New Revision: 425431
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=425431&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove as this is really a separate tool not part of the server
> runtime environment. Plus it's not used.
>
> Removed:
> geronimo/branches/1.1/modules/system/src/java/org/apache/
> geronimo/system/util/PluginRepositoryExporter.java
>