You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com> on 2012/03/22 09:03:11 UTC
[VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Hi,
here is the vote on a release build for Jena LARQ 1.0.0
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-100/
Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
Keys:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/KEYS
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jena/Jena2/LARQ/tags/jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating-RC-1/
The module is tagged with the version and "RC-1" to denote the first release candidate for this release cycle. If voted on successfully, the tag will be changed ("svn mv") to the same name but minus
the RC-1.
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open to the end of
Sunday 26/March 23:59 UTC
(72 hours from the same hour tonight).
Paolo
Re: [VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Paolo Castagna wrote:
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
+1
Paolo
Re: [] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Benson Margulies wrote:
> Here's another +1.
Thank you Benson.
Next step is to call a [VOTE] on general@i.a.o. I'll do that.
Paolo
>
> On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 27/03/12 17:07, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>>
>>> Robert Vesse wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would release now as we have several more rounds of emails and votes
>>>> to get through before Jena actually gets to graduate, namely:
>>>>
>>>> - Proposed Resolution Discussion on general@i.a.o
>>>> - Resolution vote on general@i.a.o
>>>> - Board Meeting (which is third monday of month so if we time everything
>>>> nicely we may get graduation approved by end of April)
>>>>
>>> Hi Rob
>>>
>>> We currently have two +1 from committers, vote has closed.
>>> I think it is possible to run the [VOTE] for longer an wait to
>>> see if another vote comes (if it is necessary) before sending
>>> the [VOTE] on general@i.a.o. But, I am not sure about this.
>>>
>>> I assumed my [VOTE] was implicit, but I guess it is a wrong
>>> assumption, so I explicitly voted now (but after the deadline).
>>> Is such vote valid?
>>>
>> Two +1's so far.
>>
>> Is this vote really closed? I don't see a CLOSED message. The deadline
>> is really just the earliest time when you can declare a RESULT and close it
>> with a positive outcome because you have then timed out on any -1's.
>> Voting after the named deadline is all too common.
>>
>> What do you want to do? Having said it's closed in this message, without
>> a message tagged as such, leaves it in an uncertain state. Time to
>> collapse that wave function.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>> Will the [VOTE] for LARQ be the last [VOTE] for a release of a
>>> module before sending the [VOTE] for graduation or we need/want
>>> to release SDB as well before that?
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>>
>
Re: [] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Here's another +1.
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 27/03/12 17:07, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>
>> Robert Vesse wrote:
>>
>>> I would release now as we have several more rounds of emails and votes
>>> to get through before Jena actually gets to graduate, namely:
>>>
>>> - Proposed Resolution Discussion on general@i.a.o
>>> - Resolution vote on general@i.a.o
>>> - Board Meeting (which is third monday of month so if we time everything
>>> nicely we may get graduation approved by end of April)
>>>
>>
>> Hi Rob
>>
>> We currently have two +1 from committers, vote has closed.
>> I think it is possible to run the [VOTE] for longer an wait to
>> see if another vote comes (if it is necessary) before sending
>> the [VOTE] on general@i.a.o. But, I am not sure about this.
>>
>> I assumed my [VOTE] was implicit, but I guess it is a wrong
>> assumption, so I explicitly voted now (but after the deadline).
>> Is such vote valid?
>>
>
> Two +1's so far.
>
> Is this vote really closed? I don't see a CLOSED message. The deadline
> is really just the earliest time when you can declare a RESULT and close it
> with a positive outcome because you have then timed out on any -1's.
> Voting after the named deadline is all too common.
>
> What do you want to do? Having said it's closed in this message, without
> a message tagged as such, leaves it in an uncertain state. Time to
> collapse that wave function.
>
> Andy
>
>
>> Will the [VOTE] for LARQ be the last [VOTE] for a release of a
>> module before sending the [VOTE] for graduation or we need/want
>> to release SDB as well before that?
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>
Re: [] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 27/03/12 17:07, Paolo Castagna wrote:
> Robert Vesse wrote:
>> I would release now as we have several more rounds of emails and votes to get through before Jena actually gets to graduate, namely:
>>
>> - Proposed Resolution Discussion on general@i.a.o
>> - Resolution vote on general@i.a.o
>> - Board Meeting (which is third monday of month so if we time everything nicely we may get graduation approved by end of April)
>
> Hi Rob
>
> We currently have two +1 from committers, vote has closed.
> I think it is possible to run the [VOTE] for longer an wait to
> see if another vote comes (if it is necessary) before sending
> the [VOTE] on general@i.a.o. But, I am not sure about this.
>
> I assumed my [VOTE] was implicit, but I guess it is a wrong
> assumption, so I explicitly voted now (but after the deadline).
> Is such vote valid?
Two +1's so far.
Is this vote really closed? I don't see a CLOSED message. The deadline
is really just the earliest time when you can declare a RESULT and close
it with a positive outcome because you have then timed out on any -1's.
Voting after the named deadline is all too common.
What do you want to do? Having said it's closed in this message,
without a message tagged as such, leaves it in an uncertain state. Time
to collapse that wave function.
Andy
>
> Will the [VOTE] for LARQ be the last [VOTE] for a release of a
> module before sending the [VOTE] for graduation or we need/want
> to release SDB as well before that?
>
> Paolo
Re: [VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Robert Vesse wrote:
> I would release now as we have several more rounds of emails and votes to get through before Jena actually gets to graduate, namely:
>
> - Proposed Resolution Discussion on general@i.a.o
> - Resolution vote on general@i.a.o
> - Board Meeting (which is third monday of month so if we time everything nicely we may get graduation approved by end of April)
Hi Rob
We currently have two +1 from committers, vote has closed.
I think it is possible to run the [VOTE] for longer an wait to
see if another vote comes (if it is necessary) before sending
the [VOTE] on general@i.a.o. But, I am not sure about this.
I assumed my [VOTE] was implicit, but I guess it is a wrong
assumption, so I explicitly voted now (but after the deadline).
Is such vote valid?
Will the [VOTE] for LARQ be the last [VOTE] for a release of a
module before sending the [VOTE] for graduation or we need/want
to release SDB as well before that?
Paolo
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Vesse -- YarcData.com<http://YarcData.com> -- A Division of Cray Inc
> Software Engineer, Bay Area
> m: 925.960.3941 | o: 925.264.4729 | @: rvesse@yarcdata.com<ma...@yarcdata.com> | Skype: rvesse
> 6210 Stoneridge Mall Rd | Suite 120 | Pleasanton CA, 94588
>
> [cid:BC8A5E0A-0B0A-43B5-87B5-93039573F2CD@americas.cray.com]
>
> On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>
> Paolo Castagna wrote:
> Hi, what should we do about this?
>
> Just to clarify.
>
> I replied to Andy's comments in this thread and with changes in SVN, but I
> did not ignored his +1 vote. Therefore, I didn't think it was necessary to
> cut another RC since there aren't major issues.
>
> In the meantime, the [VOTE] for graduating Jena came.
>
> I see two options:
>
> 1. release LARQ before graduating
> 2. release LARQ after graduation
>
> If you want to suggest a third option, I am open and happy to help.
> My third option at the moment would not be constructive, so omitted. :-)
>
> Paolo
>
>
> Paolo
>
> Paolo Castagna wrote:
> Hi,
> here is the vote on a release build for Jena LARQ 1.0.0
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-100/
>
> Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
> http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
>
> Keys:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/KEYS
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jena/Jena2/LARQ/tags/jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating-RC-1/
>
> The module is tagged with the version and "RC-1" to denote the first release candidate for this release cycle. If voted on successfully, the tag will be changed ("svn mv") to the same name but minus
> the RC-1.
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
> Sunday 26/March 23:59 UTC
> (72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>
> Paolo
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 27/03/12 16:49, Robert Vesse wrote:
> I would release now as we have several more rounds of emails and votes
> to get through before Jena actually gets to graduate, namely:
>
> - Proposed Resolution Discussion on general@i.a.o
> - Resolution vote on general@i.a.o
> - Board Meeting (which is third monday of month so if we time everything
> nicely we may get graduation approved by end of April)
+1
Andy
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Vesse -- YarcData.com <http://YarcData.com> -- A Division of Cray Inc
> Software Engineer, Bay Area
> m: 925.960.3941 | o: 925.264.4729 | @: rvesse@yarcdata.com
> <ma...@yarcdata.com> | Skype: rvesse
> 6210 Stoneridge Mall Rd | Suite 120 | Pleasanton CA, 94588
>
>
> On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
>
>> Paolo Castagna wrote:
>>> Hi, what should we do about this?
>>
>> Just to clarify.
>>
>> I replied to Andy's comments in this thread and with changes in SVN, but I
>> did not ignored his +1 vote. Therefore, I didn't think it was necessary to
>> cut another RC since there aren't major issues.
>>
>> In the meantime, the [VOTE] for graduating Jena came.
>>
>> I see two options:
>>
>> 1. release LARQ before graduating
>> 2. release LARQ after graduation
>>
>> If you want to suggest a third option, I am open and happy to help.
>> My third option at the moment would not be constructive, so omitted. :-)
>>
>> Paolo
>>
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>>
>>> Paolo Castagna wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> here is the vote on a release build for Jena LARQ 1.0.0
>>>>
>>>> Staging repository:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-100/
>>>>
>>>> Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
>>>>
>>>> Keys:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> SVN tag:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jena/Jena2/LARQ/tags/jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating-RC-1/
>>>>
>>>> The module is tagged with the version and "RC-1" to denote the first
>>>> release candidate for this release cycle. If voted on successfully,
>>>> the tag will be changed ("svn mv") to the same name but minus
>>>> the RC-1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>>>
>>>> Sunday 26/March 23:59 UTC
>>>> (72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>>>>
>>>> Paolo
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Robert Vesse <rv...@yarcdata.com>.
I would release now as we have several more rounds of emails and votes to get through before Jena actually gets to graduate, namely:
- Proposed Resolution Discussion on general@i.a.o
- Resolution vote on general@i.a.o
- Board Meeting (which is third monday of month so if we time everything nicely we may get graduation approved by end of April)
Rob
Rob Vesse -- YarcData.com<http://YarcData.com> -- A Division of Cray Inc
Software Engineer, Bay Area
m: 925.960.3941 | o: 925.264.4729 | @: rvesse@yarcdata.com<ma...@yarcdata.com> | Skype: rvesse
6210 Stoneridge Mall Rd | Suite 120 | Pleasanton CA, 94588
[cid:BC8A5E0A-0B0A-43B5-87B5-93039573F2CD@americas.cray.com]
On Mar 27, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Paolo Castagna wrote:
Hi, what should we do about this?
Just to clarify.
I replied to Andy's comments in this thread and with changes in SVN, but I
did not ignored his +1 vote. Therefore, I didn't think it was necessary to
cut another RC since there aren't major issues.
In the meantime, the [VOTE] for graduating Jena came.
I see two options:
1. release LARQ before graduating
2. release LARQ after graduation
If you want to suggest a third option, I am open and happy to help.
My third option at the moment would not be constructive, so omitted. :-)
Paolo
Paolo
Paolo Castagna wrote:
Hi,
here is the vote on a release build for Jena LARQ 1.0.0
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-100/
Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
Keys:
http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/KEYS
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jena/Jena2/LARQ/tags/jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating-RC-1/
The module is tagged with the version and "RC-1" to denote the first release candidate for this release cycle. If voted on successfully, the tag will be changed ("svn mv") to the same name but minus
the RC-1.
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open to the end of
Sunday 26/March 23:59 UTC
(72 hours from the same hour tonight).
Paolo
Re: [VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Paolo Castagna wrote:
> Hi, what should we do about this?
Just to clarify.
I replied to Andy's comments in this thread and with changes in SVN, but I
did not ignored his +1 vote. Therefore, I didn't think it was necessary to
cut another RC since there aren't major issues.
In the meantime, the [VOTE] for graduating Jena came.
I see two options:
1. release LARQ before graduating
2. release LARQ after graduation
If you want to suggest a third option, I am open and happy to help.
My third option at the moment would not be constructive, so omitted. :-)
Paolo
>
> Paolo
>
> Paolo Castagna wrote:
>> Hi,
>> here is the vote on a release build for Jena LARQ 1.0.0
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-100/
>>
>> Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
>> http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
>>
>> Keys:
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/KEYS
>>
>> SVN tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jena/Jena2/LARQ/tags/jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating-RC-1/
>>
>> The module is tagged with the version and "RC-1" to denote the first release candidate for this release cycle. If voted on successfully, the tag will be changed ("svn mv") to the same name but minus
>> the RC-1.
>>
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>
>> This vote will be open to the end of
>>
>> Sunday 26/March 23:59 UTC
>> (72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>>
>> Paolo
Re: [VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Hi, what should we do about this?
Paolo
Paolo Castagna wrote:
> Hi,
> here is the vote on a release build for Jena LARQ 1.0.0
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-100/
>
> Proposed files and structure to merge with existing dist/ area:
> http://people.apache.org/~castagna/merge-jena-larq-1.0.0-RC-1/
>
> Keys:
> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/jena/KEYS
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/jena/Jena2/LARQ/tags/jena-larq-1.0.0-incubating-RC-1/
>
> The module is tagged with the version and "RC-1" to denote the first release candidate for this release cycle. If voted on successfully, the tag will be changed ("svn mv") to the same name but minus
> the RC-1.
>
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> This vote will be open to the end of
>
> Sunday 26/March 23:59 UTC
> (72 hours from the same hour tonight).
>
> Paolo
Re: [] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Andy
Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 22/03/12 18:28, Paolo Castagna wrote:
> ...
>
>> LARQ isn't distributed as a binary .zip distribution to be used by
>> non developers. I removed the shell scripts, now mvn package will
>> create a one jar which can be used to run commands easily.
>
> I tried mvn package and it puts the with-dependencies in target.Am I
> right in assuming that means for releases from now there'll also be a
> with-dependencies.jar in the maven release repository?
>
> You need to sort out the N&L files. The current N&L apply to the LARQ
> jar and are fine. For the with-dependencies jar you'll to put in
> different N&L files for the consolidated set of dependences as you now
> redistributing other binaries as well as Jena code.
Good point.
Actually, another option would be to provide a way to generate the
with-dependencies.jar but not publish that in the Maven repository.
Shell scripts were broken (my fault) and nobody complained. :-)
>
> See Fuseki ... but that is only one way of doing it and I am not saying
> that it is the right for LARQ.
Yep.
Paolo
>
> Andy
Re: [] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 22/03/12 18:28, Paolo Castagna wrote:
...
> LARQ isn't distributed as a binary .zip distribution to be used by
> non developers. I removed the shell scripts, now mvn package will
> create a one jar which can be used to run commands easily.
I tried mvn package and it puts the with-dependencies in target.Am I
right in assuming that means for releases from now there'll also be a
with-dependencies.jar in the maven release repository?
You need to sort out the N&L files. The current N&L apply to the LARQ
jar and are fine. For the with-dependencies jar you'll to put in
different N&L files for the consolidated set of dependences as you now
redistributing other binaries as well as Jena code.
See Fuseki ... but that is only one way of doing it and I am not saying
that it is the right for LARQ.
Andy
Re: [VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Andy, thanks.
Andy Seaborne wrote:
> the LICENSE file ends with:
> [[
> ==========================================================================
> The Apache License, Version 2.0 applies to the following libraries:
> Apache Lucene
> ]]
> but I don't see why.
Removed.
> * RAT:
> org.apache.jena.larq.TestLuceneNRT has no license
> (I recently (13 March) fixed this in SVN)
My mistake, I missed that update.
> * Scripts
>
> The script bin/larq does not run
> (classpath does not get set properly, no instructions on website)
>
> This works:
> mvn -q exec:java -Dexec.mainClass="larq.larq" \
> -Dexec.classpathScope=runtime -Dexec.args="--help"
>
> except no log4j and it's clunky.
LARQ isn't distributed as a binary .zip distribution to be used by
non developers. I removed the shell scripts, now mvn package will
create a one jar which can be used to run commands easily.
Updated the README.txt file with instruction.
I'll update the website as well.
> Suggestion: Either hide in documentation or fix.
>
> * Website
>
> Make documentation quick link "LARQ - Free Text Search"
I did this, but I shouldn't have... now we have a serious problem
in staging... the navigation bar does not work because all "_"
became "-". I don't know why.
And, I do not know if I can revert that, because of the buildbot.
I tried to ask #asfinfra this morning, but I am not sure that is
the best channel (no reply). I'll try different channels.
Paolo
Re: [VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
+1 with comments
Details:
== source-release zip:
* .asc, md5 and sha1 all correct.
* NOTICE looks good.
* LICENSE looks OK but ...
the LICENSE file ends with:
[[
==========================================================================
The Apache License, Version 2.0 applies to the following libraries:
Apache Lucene
]]
but I don't see why. Lucene is not shipped and is no different to
various other libraries used by, but not shipped with, LARQ.
* RAT:
org.apache.jena.larq.TestLuceneNRT has no license
(I recently (13 March) fixed this in SVN)
* Scripts
The script bin/larq does not run
(classpath does not get set properly, no instructions on website)
This works:
mvn -q exec:java -Dexec.mainClass="larq.larq" \
-Dexec.classpathScope=runtime -Dexec.args="--help"
except no log4j and it's clunky.
Suggestion: Either hide in documentation or fix.
* Website
Make documentation quick link "LARQ - Free Text Search"
== jar from staging:
LICENSE and NOTICE look good
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release jena-larq 1.0.0-incubating (RC-1)
Posted by Paolo Castagna <ca...@googlemail.com>.
This vote passes with 3 +1 from PPMC members:
PPMC:
Andy Seaborne
Paolo Castagna
Benson Margulies
I'll start the vote on general@incubator.
Paolo