You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by "allisonwang-db (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/09/02 17:49:25 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] allisonwang-db commented on a diff in pull request #42770: [SPARK-45049][CONNECT][DOCS][TESTS] Refine docstrings of `coalesce/repartition/repartitionByRange`

allisonwang-db commented on code in PR #42770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/42770#discussion_r1313926440


##########
python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py:
##########
@@ -1809,18 +1810,27 @@ def repartition(  # type: ignore[misc]
 
         Repartition the data into 10 partitions.
 
-        >>> df.repartition(10).rdd.getNumPartitions()
-        10
+        >>> df.repartition(10).explain()
+        == Physical Plan ==

Review Comment:
   Hmm, I don't think displaying the physical plan is very user-friendly; it can be daunting for new Spark users who might not understand what `RoundRobinPartitioning(10)` means. Personally I prefer the original examples.
   
   Just curious, is it feasible to support `getNumPartitions()` in Spark Connect? This API is actually pretty useful.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org