You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by Sneha Chaturvedi <sn...@yahoo.com> on 2008/08/26 08:08:35 UTC
Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Hello all,
I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
Created a new profile
Went to contact us
but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
so i think no permission is set for the user profile created through ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create profile section.
It shows me the error :
Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must have the one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
What should be done in this case.
Thanks in advance
--
Sneha
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Did you try to remove the checking service in service definition ? It should work then. Hans has added what is needed for that (see
my previous post).
Unfortunatly the service definition has this checking service which prevent Hans's hack to work. That's why I did not take any
decisions since my 1st post. Because I hope Hans to have a look, as I guess he is needing that ;o)
Jacques
From: "Chirag Manocha" <ma...@gmail.com>
> Hello,
> I am facing the same problem again when sending the order confirmation mail.
>
> I think the communication event is generated with the userlogin system, but
> it is taking the userlogin as the current user logged in.
>
> Here is the log for the same :-
> ---- exception report
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Async-Service failed.
> Exception: org.ofbiz.service.GenericServiceException
> Message: Could not commit transaction for service [sendOrderConfirmation]
> call: Roll back error, could not commit transaction, was rolled back instead
> because of: Service [createCommunicationEventRole] threw an unexpected
> exception/errororg.ofbiz.service.ServiceAuthException: Security Error: To
> run createCommunicationEventRole you must have the one of the following
> permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE,
> PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN (Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you
> must have the one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN)
>
> *Please give me direction if I am going wrong.*
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Chirag Manocha
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Chirag Manocha <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
I am facing the same problem again when sending the order confirmation mail.
I think the communication event is generated with the userlogin system, but
it is taking the userlogin as the current user logged in.
Here is the log for the same :-
---- exception report
----------------------------------------------------------
Async-Service failed.
Exception: org.ofbiz.service.GenericServiceException
Message: Could not commit transaction for service [sendOrderConfirmation]
call: Roll back error, could not commit transaction, was rolled back instead
because of: Service [createCommunicationEventRole] threw an unexpected
exception/errororg.ofbiz.service.ServiceAuthException: Security Error: To
run createCommunicationEventRole you must have the one of the following
permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE,
PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN (Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you
must have the one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN)
*Please give me direction if I am going wrong.*
--
Thanks & Regards
Chirag Manocha
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Chirag Manocha <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jacques
I am also facing the same problem.
Will you please be more specific about it.
Thanks in advance Jacques
--
Chirag Manocha
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by "Robert G." <ga...@mercon24.de>.
FYI
I followed the method chain until I realised that an SECA used the System
user with its login. But I had a System User without login, so I created it
and everything worked fine.
:)
--
View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp157475p4643992.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by "Robert G." <ga...@mercon24.de>.
Yes I will go through it, first I thought its the same error, but its just a
service error, that it retries it...with another reason.
So maybe it was caused by my previous modifications...
--
View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp157475p4643731.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I thought the same: the partyId must be missing at this point. No ideas why, check your code maybe?
Jacques
Robert G. wrote:
> Maybe this means that there is only the primary key roletypeid committed, but
> the entity PartyRole expects two primary keys roletypeid and partyid. Am I
> right? If yes do you know which is the corresponding file to add the second
> primary key? Or is does it have another reason?
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by "Robert G." <ga...@mercon24.de>.
Maybe this means that there is only the primary key roletypeid committed, but
the entity PartyRole expects two primary keys roletypeid and partyid. Am I
right? If yes do you know which is the corresponding file to add the second
primary key? Or is does it have another reason?
--
View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp157475p4643710.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by "Robert G." <ga...@mercon24.de>.
hey guys,
i got the same problem with order confirmation email. The Email is send to
the customer, but multiple times.
the error is:
/944826 [default-invoker-Thread-15] ERROR
org.ofbiz.service.ServiceDispatcher -
---- exception report
----------------------------------------------------------
Could not commit transaction for service [sendOrderConfirmation] call
Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.transaction.GenericTransactionException
Message: Roll back error, could not commit transaction, was rolled back
instead because of: Failure in findOne operation for entity [PartyRole]:
org.ofbiz.entity.GenericModelException: [GenericDelegator.findOne] Passed
primary key is not a valid primary key:
[GenericEntity:PartyRole][roleTypeId,OWNER(java.lang.String)]. Rolling back
transaction.org.ofbiz.entity.GenericModelException:
[GenericDelegator.findOne] Passed primary key is not a valid primary key:
[GenericEntity:PartyRole][roleTypeId,OWNER(java.lang.String)]
([GenericDelegator.findOne] Passed primary key is not a valid primary key:
[GenericEntity:PartyRole][roleTypeId,OWNER(java.lang.String)])
---- cause
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Exception: org.ofbiz.entity.GenericModelException
Message: [GenericDelegator.findOne] Passed primary key is not a valid
primary key: [GenericEntity:PartyRole][roleTypeId,OWNER(java.lang.String)]
/
my "CommunicationEventServices.xml" looks completely same as:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/script/org/ofbiz/party/communication/CommunicationEventServices.xml
do any one have the same problem and / or an idea?
greetings robert
--
View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp157475p4643709.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by BJ Freeman <bj...@free-man.net>.
if you look in the commit mailing list for 699636
you will get the patch.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ofbiz-commits/
Calum Miller sent the following on 11/19/2008 3:04 PM:
> Hi
>
> Many thanks for this fix, which files do I need to update...is it just
> CommunicationEventServices.xml?
>
> Calum Miller
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Fixed in revision: 699636
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>>> I have written something wich works without changing previous
>>> behaviour for other calls (out of eCommerce).
>>> But I had also to duplicate an rename
>>> createCommunicationEventInterface into
>>> createCommunicationEventWithoutPermission since it"s there that
>>> createCommunicationEventRole, and now
>>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermission, are called
>>>
>>> I will reffine before commiting
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>>>> Hi Sumit,
>>>>
>>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>>> Jacques,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have an idea regarding to it. It is quite similar to yours.
>>>>>
>>>>> Idea is to call a service via eca which return hasPermission =
>>>>> true when permission check service return false.
>>>>>
>>>>> The code would be like this :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Write an service (for instance:
>>>>> overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck ) which return a
>>>>> boolean hasPermission=true.
>>>>
>>>> I'd have prefered that you have explained *what* you want before *how*.
>>>> So the *what* is that you want to allow access for everybody fut
>>>> anonymous.
>>>> Then I wonder if PartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck is usefull
>>>> at all (except in the anonymous very specific case)...
>>>> That's why I suggested to have 2 types of permission and use them
>>>> accordingly.
>>>> It needs more work but it allows both possibilities without changing
>>>> anything else.
>>>> So no, I don't agree it's the same idea
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>> Like :
>>>>> <simple-method method-
>>>>> name="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" short-
>>>>> description="">
>>>>> <if-compare value="anonymous"
>>>>> field="userLogin.userLoginId" operator="not-equals">
>>>>> <set field="hasPermission" type="Boolean" value="true"/>
>>>>> <field-to-result field-name="hasPermission"/>
>>>>> </if-compare>
>>>>> </simple-method>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Call this service via an eca, with condition if
>>>>> hasPermission=false :
>>>>> <eca service="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
>>>>> event="return" run-on-failure="true">
>>>>> <condition field-name="hasPermission" operator="equals"
>>>>> value="false" type="Boolean"/>
>>>>> <action
>>>>> service="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
>>>>> mode="sync" result-to-result="true"/>
>>>>> </eca>
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggest if you are agree with it ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 24, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Feel free to suggest a patch in Jira from my remarks below.
>>>>>> Except if someone see a better solution ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Ritesh Trivedi" <ri...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> Any updates on this one?
>>>>>>> I am getting multiple order confirmation emails as well due to
>>>>>>> this error. I
>>>>>>> think someone has also reported this issue.
>>>>>>> jacques.le.roux wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sumit,
>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days.
>>>>>>>> I would
>>>>>>>> suggest to
>>>>>>>> 1. Introduce a service interface definition same than
>>>>>>>> createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check,
>>>>>>>> description would be "Create a Communication Event Role with or
>>>>>>>> w/ o permission check."
>>>>>>>> 2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the
>>>>>>>> permission check.
>>>>>>>> 3. To create a new service definition (say
>>>>>>>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same
>>>>>>>> interface,
>>>>>>>> same implementation
>>>>>>>> (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but without permission check
>>>>>>>> 4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere
>>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>>> need appears.
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>>>>>>> Hello Jacques, Hans
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the
>>>>>>>>> service definition. Here i found it works well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from
>>>>>>>>> the service,
>>>>>>>>> if not remove following code will block :
>>>>>>>>> 1) Contact us (as already known)
>>>>>>>>> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for
>>>>>>>>> send email
>>>>>>>>> notification on create profile then it causes the same error
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and some more ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix
>>>>>>>>> urgently since my customized application is blocked due to it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>>>>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
>>>>>>>>>> main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>>>>>>>>>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>>>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>>>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole" auth="true">
>>>>>>>>>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>>>>>>>>>> <permission-service service-
>>>>>>>>>> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-
>>>>>>>>>> action="UPDATE"/>
>>>>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>>>>>>> include="pk" mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>>>>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>>>>>>> include="nonpk"
>>>>>>>>>> mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>>>>>>>>>> </service>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow
>>>>>>>>>> everybody to use
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>>>>>>>>>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>>>>>>>>>> </entity-one>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Created a new profile
>>>>>>>>>>> Went to contact us
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>>>>>>>>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile
>>>>>>>>>>> created through
>>>>>>>>>>> ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create
>>>>>>>>>>> profile section.
>>>>>>>>>>> It shows me the error :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must
>>>>>>>>>>> have the
>>>>>>>>>>> one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
>>>>>>>>>>> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Sneha
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp19156327p19616070.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=699636
Jacques
From: "Calum Miller" <ca...@yahoo.com>
> Hi
>
> Many thanks for this fix, which files do I need to update...is it just
> CommunicationEventServices.xml?
>
> Calum Miller
>
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> Fixed in revision: 699636
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>>> I have written something wich works without changing previous
>>> behaviour for other calls (out of eCommerce).
>>> But I had also to duplicate an rename
>>> createCommunicationEventInterface into
>>> createCommunicationEventWithoutPermission since it"s there that
>>> createCommunicationEventRole, and now
>>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermission, are called
>>>
>>> I will reffine before commiting
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>>>> Hi Sumit,
>>>>
>>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>>> Jacques,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have an idea regarding to it. It is quite similar to yours.
>>>>>
>>>>> Idea is to call a service via eca which return hasPermission =
>>>>> true when permission check service return false.
>>>>>
>>>>> The code would be like this :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Write an service (for instance:
>>>>> overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck ) which return a
>>>>> boolean hasPermission=true.
>>>>
>>>> I'd have prefered that you have explained *what* you want before *how*.
>>>> So the *what* is that you want to allow access for everybody fut
>>>> anonymous.
>>>> Then I wonder if PartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck is usefull
>>>> at all (except in the anonymous very specific case)...
>>>> That's why I suggested to have 2 types of permission and use them
>>>> accordingly.
>>>> It needs more work but it allows both possibilities without changing
>>>> anything else.
>>>> So no, I don't agree it's the same idea
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>> Like :
>>>>> <simple-method method-
>>>>> name="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" short-
>>>>> description="">
>>>>> <if-compare value="anonymous"
>>>>> field="userLogin.userLoginId" operator="not-equals">
>>>>> <set field="hasPermission" type="Boolean" value="true"/>
>>>>> <field-to-result field-name="hasPermission"/>
>>>>> </if-compare>
>>>>> </simple-method>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Call this service via an eca, with condition if
>>>>> hasPermission=false :
>>>>> <eca service="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
>>>>> event="return" run-on-failure="true">
>>>>> <condition field-name="hasPermission" operator="equals"
>>>>> value="false" type="Boolean"/>
>>>>> <action
>>>>> service="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
>>>>> mode="sync" result-to-result="true"/>
>>>>> </eca>
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggest if you are agree with it ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 24, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Feel free to suggest a patch in Jira from my remarks below.
>>>>>> Except if someone see a better solution ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Ritesh Trivedi" <ri...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> Any updates on this one?
>>>>>>> I am getting multiple order confirmation emails as well due to
>>>>>>> this error. I
>>>>>>> think someone has also reported this issue.
>>>>>>> jacques.le.roux wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sumit,
>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days.
>>>>>>>> I would
>>>>>>>> suggest to
>>>>>>>> 1. Introduce a service interface definition same than
>>>>>>>> createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check,
>>>>>>>> description would be "Create a Communication Event Role with or
>>>>>>>> w/ o permission check."
>>>>>>>> 2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the
>>>>>>>> permission check.
>>>>>>>> 3. To create a new service definition (say
>>>>>>>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same
>>>>>>>> interface,
>>>>>>>> same implementation
>>>>>>>> (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but without permission check
>>>>>>>> 4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere
>>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>>> need appears.
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>>>>>>> Hello Jacques, Hans
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the
>>>>>>>>> service definition. Here i found it works well.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from
>>>>>>>>> the service,
>>>>>>>>> if not remove following code will block :
>>>>>>>>> 1) Contact us (as already known)
>>>>>>>>> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for
>>>>>>>>> send email
>>>>>>>>> notification on create profile then it causes the same error
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and some more ...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix
>>>>>>>>> urgently since my customized application is blocked due to it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>>>>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
>>>>>>>>>> main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>>>>>>>>>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>>>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>>>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole" auth="true">
>>>>>>>>>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>>>>>>>>>> <permission-service service-
>>>>>>>>>> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-
>>>>>>>>>> action="UPDATE"/>
>>>>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>>>>>>> include="pk" mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>>>>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>>>>>>> include="nonpk"
>>>>>>>>>> mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>>>>>>>>>> </service>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow
>>>>>>>>>> everybody to use
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>>>>>>>>>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>>>>>>>>>> </entity-one>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Created a new profile
>>>>>>>>>>> Went to contact us
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>>>>>>>>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile
>>>>>>>>>>> created through
>>>>>>>>>>> ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create
>>>>>>>>>>> profile section.
>>>>>>>>>>> It shows me the error :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must
>>>>>>>>>>> have the
>>>>>>>>>>> one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
>>>>>>>>>>> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Sneha
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp19156327p19616070.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Calum Miller <ca...@yahoo.com>.
Hi
Many thanks for this fix, which files do I need to update...is it just
CommunicationEventServices.xml?
Calum Miller
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Fixed in revision: 699636
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>> I have written something wich works without changing previous
>> behaviour for other calls (out of eCommerce).
>> But I had also to duplicate an rename
>> createCommunicationEventInterface into
>> createCommunicationEventWithoutPermission since it"s there that
>> createCommunicationEventRole, and now
>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermission, are called
>>
>> I will reffine before commiting
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>>> Hi Sumit,
>>>
>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>> Jacques,
>>>>
>>>> I have an idea regarding to it. It is quite similar to yours.
>>>>
>>>> Idea is to call a service via eca which return hasPermission =
>>>> true when permission check service return false.
>>>>
>>>> The code would be like this :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1) Write an service (for instance:
>>>> overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck ) which return a
>>>> boolean hasPermission=true.
>>>
>>> I'd have prefered that you have explained *what* you want before *how*.
>>> So the *what* is that you want to allow access for everybody fut
>>> anonymous.
>>> Then I wonder if PartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck is usefull
>>> at all (except in the anonymous very specific case)...
>>> That's why I suggested to have 2 types of permission and use them
>>> accordingly.
>>> It needs more work but it allows both possibilities without changing
>>> anything else.
>>> So no, I don't agree it's the same idea
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>> Like :
>>>> <simple-method method-
>>>> name="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" short-
>>>> description="">
>>>> <if-compare value="anonymous"
>>>> field="userLogin.userLoginId" operator="not-equals">
>>>> <set field="hasPermission" type="Boolean" value="true"/>
>>>> <field-to-result field-name="hasPermission"/>
>>>> </if-compare>
>>>> </simple-method>
>>>>
>>>> 2) Call this service via an eca, with condition if
>>>> hasPermission=false :
>>>> <eca service="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
>>>> event="return" run-on-failure="true">
>>>> <condition field-name="hasPermission" operator="equals"
>>>> value="false" type="Boolean"/>
>>>> <action
>>>> service="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
>>>> mode="sync" result-to-result="true"/>
>>>> </eca>
>>>>
>>>> Suggest if you are agree with it ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 24, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to suggest a patch in Jira from my remarks below.
>>>>> Except if someone see a better solution ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Ritesh Trivedi" <ri...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> Any updates on this one?
>>>>>> I am getting multiple order confirmation emails as well due to
>>>>>> this error. I
>>>>>> think someone has also reported this issue.
>>>>>> jacques.le.roux wrote:
>>>>>>> Sumit,
>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days.
>>>>>>> I would
>>>>>>> suggest to
>>>>>>> 1. Introduce a service interface definition same than
>>>>>>> createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check,
>>>>>>> description would be "Create a Communication Event Role with or
>>>>>>> w/ o permission check."
>>>>>>> 2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the
>>>>>>> permission check.
>>>>>>> 3. To create a new service definition (say
>>>>>>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same
>>>>>>> interface,
>>>>>>> same implementation
>>>>>>> (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but without permission check
>>>>>>> 4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere
>>>>>>> the same
>>>>>>> need appears.
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>>>>>> Hello Jacques, Hans
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the
>>>>>>>> service definition. Here i found it works well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from
>>>>>>>> the service,
>>>>>>>> if not remove following code will block :
>>>>>>>> 1) Contact us (as already known)
>>>>>>>> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for
>>>>>>>> send email
>>>>>>>> notification on create profile then it causes the same error
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and some more ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix
>>>>>>>> urgently since my customized application is blocked due to it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>>>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
>>>>>>>>> main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>>>>>>>>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole" auth="true">
>>>>>>>>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>>>>>>>>> <permission-service service-
>>>>>>>>> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-
>>>>>>>>> action="UPDATE"/>
>>>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>>>>>> include="pk" mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>>>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>>>>>> include="nonpk"
>>>>>>>>> mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>>>>>>>>> </service>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow
>>>>>>>>> everybody to use
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>>>>>>>>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>>>>>>>>> </entity-one>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Created a new profile
>>>>>>>>>> Went to contact us
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>>>>>>>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile
>>>>>>>>>> created through
>>>>>>>>>> ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create
>>>>>>>>>> profile section.
>>>>>>>>>> It shows me the error :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must
>>>>>>>>>> have the
>>>>>>>>>> one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
>>>>>>>>>> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Sneha
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp19156327p19616070.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Fixed in revision: 699636
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>I have written something wich works without changing previous behaviour for other calls (out of eCommerce).
> But I had also to duplicate an rename createCommunicationEventInterface into createCommunicationEventWithoutPermission since it"s
> there that createCommunicationEventRole, and now createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermission, are called
>
> I will reffine before commiting
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>> Hi Sumit,
>>
>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>> Jacques,
>>>
>>> I have an idea regarding to it. It is quite similar to yours.
>>>
>>> Idea is to call a service via eca which return hasPermission = true when permission check service return false.
>>>
>>> The code would be like this :
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) Write an service (for instance: overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck ) which return a boolean
>>> hasPermission=true.
>>
>> I'd have prefered that you have explained *what* you want before *how*.
>> So the *what* is that you want to allow access for everybody fut anonymous.
>> Then I wonder if PartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck is usefull at all (except in the anonymous very specific case)...
>> That's why I suggested to have 2 types of permission and use them accordingly.
>> It needs more work but it allows both possibilities without changing anything else.
>> So no, I don't agree it's the same idea
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>> Like :
>>> <simple-method method- name="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" short- description="">
>>> <if-compare value="anonymous" field="userLogin.userLoginId" operator="not-equals">
>>> <set field="hasPermission" type="Boolean" value="true"/>
>>> <field-to-result field-name="hasPermission"/>
>>> </if-compare>
>>> </simple-method>
>>>
>>> 2) Call this service via an eca, with condition if hasPermission=false :
>>> <eca service="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" event="return" run-on-failure="true">
>>> <condition field-name="hasPermission" operator="equals" value="false" type="Boolean"/>
>>> <action service="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" mode="sync" result-to-result="true"/>
>>> </eca>
>>>
>>> Suggest if you are agree with it ?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks and Regards
>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> Feel free to suggest a patch in Jira from my remarks below. Except if someone see a better solution ?
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>> From: "Ritesh Trivedi" <ri...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Any updates on this one?
>>>>> I am getting multiple order confirmation emails as well due to this error. I
>>>>> think someone has also reported this issue.
>>>>> jacques.le.roux wrote:
>>>>>> Sumit,
>>>>>> Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days. I would
>>>>>> suggest to
>>>>>> 1. Introduce a service interface definition same than
>>>>>> createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check, description would be "Create a Communication Event Role with
>>>>>> or w/ o permission check."
>>>>>> 2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the permission check.
>>>>>> 3. To create a new service definition (say
>>>>>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same interface,
>>>>>> same implementation
>>>>>> (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/ CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but without permission check
>>>>>> 4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere the same
>>>>>> need appears.
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>>>>> Hello Jacques, Hans
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the service definition. Here i found it works well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from the service,
>>>>>>> if not remove following code will block :
>>>>>>> 1) Contact us (as already known)
>>>>>>> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for send email
>>>>>>> notification on create profile then it causes the same error
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and some more ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix urgently since my customized application is blocked due to
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>>>>>>>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml" invoke="createCommunicationEventRole" auth="true">
>>>>>>>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>>>>>>>> <permission-service service-
>>>>>>>> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main- action="UPDATE"/>
>>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="pk" mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="nonpk"
>>>>>>>> mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>>>>>>>> </service>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow everybody to use
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>>>>>>>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>>>>>>>> </entity-one>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Created a new profile
>>>>>>>>> Went to contact us
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>>>>>>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile created through
>>>>>>>>> ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create profile section.
>>>>>>>>> It shows me the error :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must have the
>>>>>>>>> one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sneha
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp19156327p19616070.html
>>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I have written something wich works without changing previous behaviour for other calls (out of eCommerce).
But I had also to duplicate an rename createCommunicationEventInterface into createCommunicationEventWithoutPermission since it"s
there that createCommunicationEventRole, and now createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermission, are called
I will reffine before commiting
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>> Jacques,
>>
>> I have an idea regarding to it. It is quite similar to yours.
>>
>> Idea is to call a service via eca which return hasPermission = true when permission check service return false.
>>
>> The code would be like this :
>>
>>
>> 1) Write an service (for instance: overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck ) which return a boolean hasPermission=true.
>
> I'd have prefered that you have explained *what* you want before *how*.
> So the *what* is that you want to allow access for everybody fut anonymous.
> Then I wonder if PartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck is usefull at all (except in the anonymous very specific case)...
> That's why I suggested to have 2 types of permission and use them accordingly.
> It needs more work but it allows both possibilities without changing anything else.
> So no, I don't agree it's the same idea
>
> Jacques
>
>> Like :
>> <simple-method method- name="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" short- description="">
>> <if-compare value="anonymous" field="userLogin.userLoginId" operator="not-equals">
>> <set field="hasPermission" type="Boolean" value="true"/>
>> <field-to-result field-name="hasPermission"/>
>> </if-compare>
>> </simple-method>
>>
>> 2) Call this service via an eca, with condition if hasPermission=false :
>> <eca service="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" event="return" run-on-failure="true">
>> <condition field-name="hasPermission" operator="equals" value="false" type="Boolean"/>
>> <action service="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" mode="sync" result-to-result="true"/>
>> </eca>
>>
>> Suggest if you are agree with it ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Sumit Pandit.
>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>
>> On Sep 24, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> Feel free to suggest a patch in Jira from my remarks below. Except if someone see a better solution ?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Ritesh Trivedi" <ri...@gmail.com>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Any updates on this one?
>>>> I am getting multiple order confirmation emails as well due to this error. I
>>>> think someone has also reported this issue.
>>>> jacques.le.roux wrote:
>>>>> Sumit,
>>>>> Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days. I would
>>>>> suggest to
>>>>> 1. Introduce a service interface definition same than
>>>>> createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check, description would be "Create a Communication Event Role with
>>>>> or w/ o permission check."
>>>>> 2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the permission check.
>>>>> 3. To create a new service definition (say
>>>>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same interface,
>>>>> same implementation
>>>>> (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/ CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but without permission check
>>>>> 4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere the same
>>>>> need appears.
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>>>> Hello Jacques, Hans
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the service definition. Here i found it works well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from the service,
>>>>>> if not remove following code will block :
>>>>>> 1) Contact us (as already known)
>>>>>> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for send email
>>>>>> notification on create profile then it causes the same error
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and some more ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix urgently since my customized application is blocked due to it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>>>>>>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml" invoke="createCommunicationEventRole" auth="true">
>>>>>>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>>>>>>> <permission-service service-
>>>>>>> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main- action="UPDATE"/>
>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="pk" mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="nonpk"
>>>>>>> mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>>>>>>> </service>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow everybody to use
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>>>>>>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>>>>>>> </entity-one>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Created a new profile
>>>>>>>> Went to contact us
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>>>>>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile created through
>>>>>>>> ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create profile section.
>>>>>>>> It shows me the error :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must have the
>>>>>>>> one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sneha
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp19156327p19616070.html
>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Hi Sumit,
From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
> Jacques,
>
> I have an idea regarding to it. It is quite similar to yours.
>
> Idea is to call a service via eca which return hasPermission = true
> when permission check service return false.
>
> The code would be like this :
>
>
> 1) Write an service (for instance:
> overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck ) which return a
> boolean hasPermission=true.
I'd have prefered that you have explained *what* you want before *how*.
So the *what* is that you want to allow access for everybody fut anonymous.
Then I wonder if PartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck is usefull at all (except in the anonymous very specific case)...
That's why I suggested to have 2 types of permission and use them accordingly.
It needs more work but it allows both possibilities without changing anything else.
So no, I don't agree it's the same idea
Jacques
> Like :
> <simple-method method-
> name="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" short-
> description="">
> <if-compare value="anonymous" field="userLogin.userLoginId"
> operator="not-equals">
> <set field="hasPermission" type="Boolean" value="true"/>
> <field-to-result field-name="hasPermission"/>
> </if-compare>
> </simple-method>
>
> 2) Call this service via an eca, with condition if
> hasPermission=false :
> <eca service="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
> event="return" run-on-failure="true">
> <condition field-name="hasPermission" operator="equals"
> value="false" type="Boolean"/>
> <action
> service="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" mode="sync"
> result-to-result="true"/>
> </eca>
>
> Suggest if you are agree with it ?
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Sumit Pandit.
> HotWaxMedia, Inc
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
> On Sep 24, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Feel free to suggest a patch in Jira from my remarks below. Except
>> if someone see a better solution ?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Ritesh Trivedi" <ri...@gmail.com>
>>> Hi,
>>> Any updates on this one?
>>> I am getting multiple order confirmation emails as well due to this
>>> error. I
>>> think someone has also reported this issue.
>>> jacques.le.roux wrote:
>>>> Sumit,
>>>> Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days. I
>>>> would
>>>> suggest to
>>>> 1. Introduce a service interface definition same than
>>>> createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check,
>>>> description would be "Create a Communication Event Role with or w/
>>>> o permission check."
>>>> 2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the
>>>> permission check.
>>>> 3. To create a new service definition (say
>>>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same
>>>> interface,
>>>> same implementation
>>>> (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but without permission check
>>>> 4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere the
>>>> same
>>>> need appears.
>>>> Jacques
>>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>>> Hello Jacques, Hans
>>>>>
>>>>> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the
>>>>> service definition. Here i found it works well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from the
>>>>> service,
>>>>> if not remove following code will block :
>>>>> 1) Contact us (as already known)
>>>>> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for
>>>>> send email
>>>>> notification on create profile then it causes the same error
>>>>>
>>>>> and some more ...
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix
>>>>> urgently since my customized application is blocked due to it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>>>>>
>>>>>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/>
>>>>>> is used
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>>>>>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole" auth="true">
>>>>>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>>>>>> <permission-service service-
>>>>>> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-
>>>>>> action="UPDATE"/>
>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>>> include="pk" mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>>> include="nonpk"
>>>>>> mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>>>>>> </service>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow everybody
>>>>>> to use
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>>>>>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>>>>>> </entity-one>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Created a new profile
>>>>>>> Went to contact us
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>>>>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile created
>>>>>>> through
>>>>>>> ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create
>>>>>>> profile section.
>>>>>>> It shows me the error :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must
>>>>>>> have the
>>>>>>> one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
>>>>>>> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sneha
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp19156327p19616070.html
>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Sumit Pandit <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Jacques,
I have an idea regarding to it. It is quite similar to yours.
Idea is to call a service via eca which return hasPermission = true
when permission check service return false.
The code would be like this :
1) Write an service (for instance:
overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck ) which return a
boolean hasPermission=true.
Like :
<simple-method method-
name="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" short-
description="">
<if-compare value="anonymous" field="userLogin.userLoginId"
operator="not-equals">
<set field="hasPermission" type="Boolean" value="true"/>
<field-to-result field-name="hasPermission"/>
</if-compare>
</simple-method>
2) Call this service via an eca, with condition if
hasPermission=false :
<eca service="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck"
event="return" run-on-failure="true">
<condition field-name="hasPermission" operator="equals"
value="false" type="Boolean"/>
<action
service="overridePartyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" mode="sync"
result-to-result="true"/>
</eca>
Suggest if you are agree with it ?
--
Thanks and Regards
Sumit Pandit.
HotWaxMedia, Inc
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On Sep 24, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Feel free to suggest a patch in Jira from my remarks below. Except
> if someone see a better solution ?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Ritesh Trivedi" <ri...@gmail.com>
>> Hi,
>> Any updates on this one?
>> I am getting multiple order confirmation emails as well due to this
>> error. I
>> think someone has also reported this issue.
>> jacques.le.roux wrote:
>>> Sumit,
>>> Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days. I
>>> would
>>> suggest to
>>> 1. Introduce a service interface definition same than
>>> createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check,
>>> description would be "Create a Communication Event Role with or w/
>>> o permission check."
>>> 2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the
>>> permission check.
>>> 3. To create a new service definition (say
>>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same
>>> interface,
>>> same implementation
>>> (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but without permission check
>>> 4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere the
>>> same
>>> need appears.
>>> Jacques
>>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>> Hello Jacques, Hans
>>>>
>>>> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the
>>>> service definition. Here i found it works well.
>>>>
>>>> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from the
>>>> service,
>>>> if not remove following code will block :
>>>> 1) Contact us (as already known)
>>>> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for
>>>> send email
>>>> notification on create profile then it causes the same error
>>>>
>>>> and some more ...
>>>>
>>>> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix
>>>> urgently since my customized application is blocked due to it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks and Regards
>>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>>>>
>>>>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/>
>>>>> is used
>>>>>
>>>>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>>>>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>>>>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole" auth="true">
>>>>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>>>>> <permission-service service-
>>>>> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-
>>>>> action="UPDATE"/>
>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>> include="pk" mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
>>>>> include="nonpk"
>>>>> mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>>>>> </service>
>>>>>
>>>>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow everybody
>>>>> to use
>>>>> it
>>>>>
>>>>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>>>>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>>>>> </entity-one>
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Created a new profile
>>>>>> Went to contact us
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>>>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile created
>>>>>> through
>>>>>> ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create
>>>>>> profile section.
>>>>>> It shows me the error :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must
>>>>>> have the
>>>>>> one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
>>>>>> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sneha
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp19156327p19616070.html
>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Feel free to suggest a patch in Jira from my remarks below. Except if someone see a better solution ?
Jacques
From: "Ritesh Trivedi" <ri...@gmail.com>
>
> Hi,
>
> Any updates on this one?
>
> I am getting multiple order confirmation emails as well due to this error. I
> think someone has also reported this issue.
>
>
>
> jacques.le.roux wrote:
>>
>> Sumit,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days. I would
>> suggest to
>> 1. Introduce a service interface definition same than
>> createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check, description
>> would be "Create a Communication Event Role with or w/o permission check."
>> 2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the permission check.
>> 3. To create a new service definition (say
>> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same interface,
>> same
>> implementation
>> (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/CommunicationEventServices.xml"
>> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but
>> without permission check
>> 4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere the same
>> need appears.
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>> Hello Jacques, Hans
>>>
>>> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the service
>>> definition. Here i found it works well.
>>>
>>> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from the service,
>>> if not remove following code will block :
>>> 1) Contact us (as already known)
>>> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for send email
>>> notification on create profile then it causes the same
>>> error
>>>
>>> and some more ...
>>>
>>> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix urgently
>>> since my customized application is blocked due to it.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks and Regards
>>> Sumit Pandit.
>>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>
>>> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>>>
>>>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
>>>>
>>>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>>>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml" invoke="createCommunicationEventRole"
>>>> auth="true">
>>>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>>>> <permission-service service-
>>>> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/>
>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="pk"
>>>> mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="nonpk"
>>>> mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>>>> </service>
>>>>
>>>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow everybody to use
>>>> it
>>>>
>>>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>>>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>>>> </entity-one>
>>>>
>>>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>>>
>>>>> Created a new profile
>>>>> Went to contact us
>>>>>
>>>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile created through
>>>>> ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in
>>>>> create profile section.
>>>>> It shows me the error :
>>>>>
>>>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must have the
>>>>> one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
>>>>> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>>>
>>>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sneha
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp19156327p19616070.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Ritesh Trivedi <ri...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Any updates on this one?
I am getting multiple order confirmation emails as well due to this error. I
think someone has also reported this issue.
jacques.le.roux wrote:
>
> Sumit,
>
> Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days. I would
> suggest to
> 1. Introduce a service interface definition same than
> createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check, description
> would be "Create a Communication Event Role with or w/o permission check."
> 2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the permission check.
> 3. To create a new service definition (say
> createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same interface,
> same
> implementation
> (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/CommunicationEventServices.xml"
> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but
> without permission check
> 4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere the same
> need appears.
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>> Hello Jacques, Hans
>>
>> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the service
>> definition. Here i found it works well.
>>
>> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from the service,
>> if not remove following code will block :
>> 1) Contact us (as already known)
>> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for send email
>> notification on create profile then it causes the same
>> error
>>
>> and some more ...
>>
>> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix urgently
>> since my customized application is blocked due to it.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Sumit Pandit.
>> HotWaxMedia, Inc
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>
>> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>
>>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>>
>>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
>>>
>>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
>>> CommunicationEventServices.xml" invoke="createCommunicationEventRole"
>>> auth="true">
>>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>>> <permission-service service-
>>> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/>
>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="pk"
>>> mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="nonpk"
>>> mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>>> </service>
>>>
>>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow everybody to use
>>> it
>>>
>>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>>> </entity-one>
>>>
>>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>>
>>>> Created a new profile
>>>> Went to contact us
>>>>
>>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile created through
>>>> ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in
>>>> create profile section.
>>>> It shows me the error :
>>>>
>>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must have the
>>>> one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
>>>> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>>
>>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>> --
>>>> Sneha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Contact-Us-link-not-working-in-ecommerce-tp19156327p19616070.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Sumit,
Sorry for the delay, I was not nuch available these last days. I would suggest to
1. Introduce a service interface definition same than createCommunicationEventRole but without the permission check, description
would be "Create a Communication Event Role with or w/o permission check."
2. To use it in createCommunicationEventRole adding the permission check.
3. To create a new service definition (say createCommunicationEventRoleWithoutPermissionCheck) with same interface, same
implementation (location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/CommunicationEventServices.xml" invoke="createCommunicationEventRole") but
without permission check
4. Then to use this new services in Contact Us and everywhere the same need appears.
Jacques
From: "Sumit Pandit" <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>
> Hello Jacques, Hans
>
> I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the service definition. Here i found it works well.
>
> Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from the service,
> if not remove following code will block :
> 1) Contact us (as already known)
> 2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for send email notification on create profile then it causes the same
> error
>
> and some more ...
>
> What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix urgently since my customized application is blocked due to it.
>
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Sumit Pandit.
> HotWaxMedia, Inc
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
> On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> There is a contradiction between definition where
>>
>> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
>>
>> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
>> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/ CommunicationEventServices.xml" invoke="createCommunicationEventRole"
>> auth="true">
>> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
>> <permission-service service- name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/>
>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="pk" mode="IN" optional="false"/>
>> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="nonpk" mode="IN" optional="true"/>
>> </service>
>>
>> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow everybody to use it
>>
>> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
>> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
>> </entity-one>
>>
>> I guess we should change the definition...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>>
>>> Created a new profile
>>> Went to contact us
>>>
>>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile created through ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in
>>> create profile section.
>>> It shows me the error :
>>>
>>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must have the one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
>>> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>>
>>> What should be done in this case.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> --
>>> Sneha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Sumit Pandit <su...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Hello Jacques, Hans
I have checked it by remove the permission check line from the service
definition. Here i found it works well.
Here i requested that it is require to remove the line from the service,
if not remove following code will block :
1) Contact us (as already known)
2) In new implementation of profile when we add the code for send
email notification on create profile then it causes the same error
and some more ...
What is the best possible solution of it, It is needed to fix urgently
since my customized application is blocked due to it.
--
Thanks and Regards
Sumit Pandit.
HotWaxMedia, Inc
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On Aug 26, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> There is a contradiction between definition where
>
> partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
>
> <service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
> location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/
> CommunicationEventServices.xml"
> invoke="createCommunicationEventRole" auth="true">
> <description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
> <permission-service service-
> name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/>
> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="pk"
> mode="IN" optional="false"/>
> <auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole"
> include="nonpk" mode="IN" optional="true"/>
> </service>
>
> And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow everybody to
> use it
>
> <entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
> <field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
> </entity-one>
>
> I guess we should change the definition...
>
> Jacques
>
>
> From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>>
>> Created a new profile
>> Went to contact us
>>
>> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
>> so i think no permission is set for the user profile created
>> through ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create
>> profile section.
>> It shows me the error :
>>
>> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must have
>> the one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
>> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>>
>> What should be done in this case.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>> --
>> Sneha
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Contact Us link not working in ecommerce
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
There is a contradiction between definition where
partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/> is used
<service name="createCommunicationEventRole" engine="simple"
location="org/ofbiz/party/communication/CommunicationEventServices.xml" invoke="createCommunicationEventRole" auth="true">
<description>Create a Communication Event Role</description>
<permission-service service-name="partyCommunicationEventPermissionCheck" main-action="UPDATE"/>
<auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="pk" mode="IN" optional="false"/>
<auto-attributes entity-name="CommunicationEventRole" include="nonpk" mode="IN" optional="true"/>
</service>
And a change done (r685581) in implemtation to allow everybody to use it
<entity-one entity-name="UserLogin" value-name="sysUserLogin">
<field-map field-name="userLoginId" value="system"/>
</entity-one>
I guess we should change the definition...
Jacques
From: "Sneha Chaturvedi" <sn...@yahoo.com>
> Hello all,
>
> I visited http://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ecommerce/
>
> Created a new profile
> Went to contact us
>
> but when i send the content I am getting error for permission.
> so i think no permission is set for the user profile created through ecommerce. I think some implementation is missing in create
> profile section.
> It shows me the error :
>
> Security Error: To run createCommunicationEventRole you must have the one of the following permissions: PARTYMGR_UPDATE,
> PARTYMGR_ADMIN, PARTYMGR_CME_UPDATE, PARTYMGR_CME_ADMIN]
>
> What should be done in this case.
>
> Thanks in advance
> --
> Sneha
>
>
>
>