You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by "Musayev, Ilya" <im...@webmd.net> on 2013/07/25 20:04:27 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Hi All,
I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
Release notes:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by Alex Huang <Al...@citrix.com>.
+1 (binding)
Ran it on Ubuntu in Basic mode zone with XenServers. Tested start, stop, SG.
I really dislike that we have to put in the vhdutil by hand. I keep forgetting it. It's not a stopper though.
--Alex
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:wido@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 11:13 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I've upgraded a couple of internal systems and even production systems to
> 4.1.1
>
> We were facing a couple of bugs in production which lead me to deploy a
> homebrew version of 4.1.1 in our company. The only change is a very small
> change in the security groups script for something in our env, not applicable
> to any other setup.
>
> So I've tested 4.1.1 on our production Ubuntu 12.04 clusters.
>
> I have to note though that we run a patched version of libvirt due to this
> issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706
>
> Building goes fine on my systems and it runs without issues for us on a large
> scale KVM deployment.
>
> Wido
>
> On 07/25/2013 08:04 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> > refs/heads/4.1
> > Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
> >
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
> >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by Wido den Hollander <wi...@widodh.nl>.
+1 (binding)
I've upgraded a couple of internal systems and even production systems
to 4.1.1
We were facing a couple of bugs in production which lead me to deploy a
homebrew version of 4.1.1 in our company. The only change is a very
small change in the security groups script for something in our env, not
applicable to any other setup.
So I've tested 4.1.1 on our production Ubuntu 12.04 clusters.
I have to note though that we run a patched version of libvirt due to
this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977706
Building goes fine on my systems and it runs without issues for us on a
large scale KVM deployment.
Wido
On 07/25/2013 08:04 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
> Release notes:
>
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
>
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
[VOTE][RESULTS] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:04:27PM +0000, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
> Release notes:
>
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
>
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
All,
Ilya contacted me off list, and let me know that he's offline for a bit.
I'm going to close down this vote now.
Results:
+1 binding: chip, marcus, wido, alex, / non-binding: simon
-1 non-binding: ove, nicolas
Based on those results, I'll move forward with publishing the release
now.
-chip
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
Hi all,
Reminder that this vote is ongoing. Please take a moment to test and cast
your votes!
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Musayev, Ilya <im...@webmd.net> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
> Release notes:
>
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
>
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:04:27PM +0000, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
> Release notes:
>
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
>
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
+1 (binding)
Tested as follows:
AUTOMATED TESTING RESULTS:
[PASS] rm -Rf /tmp/cloudstack
[PASS] rm -Rf ~/.m2
[PASS] mkdir /tmp/cloudstack
[PASS] wget --no-check-certificate -q https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
[PASS] wget --no-check-certificate -q https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1.1/apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2
[PASS] wget --no-check-certificate -q https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1.1/apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2.asc
[PASS] wget --no-check-certificate -q https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1.1/apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2.md5
[PASS] wget --no-check-certificate -q https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1.1/apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2.sha
[PASS] gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2.asc
[PASS] gpg --print-md MD5 apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2 | diff - apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2.md5
[PASS] gpg --print-md SHA512 apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2 | diff - apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2.sha
[PASS] mkdir /tmp/cloudstack/git
[PASS] mkdir /tmp/cloudstack/tree
[PASS] git clone -q https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git /tmp/cloudstack/git
[PASS] git archive --prefix=/tmp/cloudstack/tree/ d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718 | tar Pxf -
[PASS] tar xvfj apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src.tar.bz2
[PASS] diff -r /tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.1.1-src /tmp/cloudstack/tree
[PASS] mvn --projects='org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack' org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.8:check
[PASS] mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install
[PASS] mvn -P developer -pl developer,tools/devcloud -Ddeploydb
I then tested some scenarios using devcloud.
-chip
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
Ove,
Thanks for reporting this, and for the suggested fix. It appears that
the issue has existed for quite some time (if I'm understanding it
correctly), so it's great to see that we've found it now.
As for 4.1.1, we are likely to need to include the fix for 3880 as
part of a 4.1.2 or 4.2.0 release (whichever comes first).
-chip
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 08:55:28PM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote:
> -1
>
> Details;
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3880
>
> RHEL6 specific; risk for database corruption if MGR is shutdown via
> anything that changes runlevel resulting in use of
> cloudstack-management, cloudstack-usage stop() targets (e.g.,
> /sbin/shutdown, "telinit 1", ACPID initiated poweroff, etc).
>
> /Ove
>
>
> On 07/25/2013 08:04 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> >Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
> >Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
> >
> >Release notes:
> >
> >http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
> >
> >
> >Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >location):
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
> >
> >PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> >Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> >For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> >[ ] +1 approve
> >[ ] +0 no opinion
> >[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
> >
>
>
> --
> Ove Everlid
> System Administrator / Architect / SDN & Linux hacker
> Mobile: +46706662363
> Office: +4618656913 (note EMEA Time Zone)
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by Ove Ewerlid <Ov...@oracle.com>.
-1
Details;
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3880
RHEL6 specific; risk for database corruption if MGR is shutdown via
anything that changes runlevel resulting in use of
cloudstack-management, cloudstack-usage stop() targets (e.g.,
/sbin/shutdown, "telinit 1", ACPID initiated poweroff, etc).
/Ove
On 07/25/2013 08:04 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
> Release notes:
>
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
>
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
--
Ove Everlid
System Administrator / Architect / SDN & Linux hacker
Mobile: +46706662363
Office: +4618656913 (note EMEA Time Zone)
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by ni...@orange.com.
OK Thanks.
I'll try to reproduce this issue and add some details of our configuration.
Regards.
Le 26/07/2013 19:30, Musayev, Ilya a écrit :
> I'm also unable to reproduce this issue in my 4.1.1 env
>
> Screenshot for added and attached 1 root and 3 data disks
> https://www.diigo.com/item/image/3qjce/wnhb
>
> Screenshot that stop and start VMs have been successful
> https://www.diigo.com/item/image/3qjce/q4i6
>
> Not adding any longs as nothing was out of the ordinary there..
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusayev@webmd.net]
>> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 1:04 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
>>
>> Nicolas,
>>
>> This issue exists in 4.1.0, 4.2.0 and as you can see has not been fixed in 4.1.1
>>
>> Since no-one is assigned to work on this ticket and we made no claims that it
>> has been fixed in 4.1.1, IMHO posting "-1" is a bit too harsh.
>>
>> While I am all for fixing this issue and will also look into this problem (we are
>> vpshere shop and I did not know if this problem), we need to raise
>> awareness on this bug and not block 4.1.1 release, because this specific issue
>> has not yet been addressed. We did address about 20+ bug fixes. If we were
>> to follow a methodology of blocking every single release because a specific
>> issue exists and has not been addressed, there is a good chance we will
>> never release anything.
>>
>> As you know, open source projects are ran by volunteers (and while many
>> developers are paid by company X), in general we do not make
>> commitments of any kind - we can try out best, but if it does not happen, we
>> will try on the next release. Therefore ACS community cannot guarantee that
>> issue X or feature Y will be added or resolved in the next release.
>>
>> With that in mind, let's work on raising awareness for this problem.
>>
>> Regards
>> ilya
>>
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: nicolas.lamirault@orange.com
>>> [mailto:nicolas.lamirault@orange.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 3:26 AM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> -1 due to the opened issue :
>>>
>>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2895
>>>
>>> Le 26/07/2013 05:42, Marcus Sorensen a écrit :
>>>> +1 binding, CentOS 6.4. Used devcloud-kvm advanced zone marvin
>>>> +config,
>>>> started up a VPC, registered a template, started a VM. Tested NFS,
>>>> local, CLVM primary storage.
>>>>
>>>> One of these days I'll get around to making an Ubuntu devcloud-kvm.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Simon Weller <sw...@ena.com> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Built NONOSS rpms and deployed on RHEL 6.3
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested vm creation + deletion, network creation + deletion,
>>>>> template
>>> creation + deletion.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Si
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Ilya Musayev" <im...@webmd.net>
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:04:27 PM
>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog
>>>>> ;h
>>>>> =refs/heads/4.1
>>>>> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>>>>>
>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23
>>>>> /
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>>> location):
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
>>>>>
>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Nicolas Lamirault
>>>
>>>
>> __________________________________________________________
>>>
>> __________________________________________________________
>>> _____
>>>
>>> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
>>> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
>>> exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message
>>> par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi
>>> que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles
>>> d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere,
>> deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>>
>>> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
>>> privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not
>>> be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
>>> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
>>> delete this message and its attachments.
>>> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
>>> been modified, changed or falsified.
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Nicolas Lamirault
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by "Musayev, Ilya" <im...@webmd.net>.
I'm also unable to reproduce this issue in my 4.1.1 env
Screenshot for added and attached 1 root and 3 data disks
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/3qjce/wnhb
Screenshot that stop and start VMs have been successful
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/3qjce/q4i6
Not adding any longs as nothing was out of the ordinary there..
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusayev@webmd.net]
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 1:04 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
>
> Nicolas,
>
> This issue exists in 4.1.0, 4.2.0 and as you can see has not been fixed in 4.1.1
>
> Since no-one is assigned to work on this ticket and we made no claims that it
> has been fixed in 4.1.1, IMHO posting "-1" is a bit too harsh.
>
> While I am all for fixing this issue and will also look into this problem (we are
> vpshere shop and I did not know if this problem), we need to raise
> awareness on this bug and not block 4.1.1 release, because this specific issue
> has not yet been addressed. We did address about 20+ bug fixes. If we were
> to follow a methodology of blocking every single release because a specific
> issue exists and has not been addressed, there is a good chance we will
> never release anything.
>
> As you know, open source projects are ran by volunteers (and while many
> developers are paid by company X), in general we do not make
> commitments of any kind - we can try out best, but if it does not happen, we
> will try on the next release. Therefore ACS community cannot guarantee that
> issue X or feature Y will be added or resolved in the next release.
>
> With that in mind, let's work on raising awareness for this problem.
>
> Regards
> ilya
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nicolas.lamirault@orange.com
> > [mailto:nicolas.lamirault@orange.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 3:26 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > -1 due to the opened issue :
> >
> > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2895
> >
> > Le 26/07/2013 05:42, Marcus Sorensen a écrit :
> > > +1 binding, CentOS 6.4. Used devcloud-kvm advanced zone marvin
> > > +config,
> > > started up a VPC, registered a template, started a VM. Tested NFS,
> > > local, CLVM primary storage.
> > >
> > > One of these days I'll get around to making an Ubuntu devcloud-kvm.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Simon Weller <sw...@ena.com> wrote:
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Built NONOSS rpms and deployed on RHEL 6.3
> > >>
> > >> Tested vm creation + deletion, network creation + deletion,
> > >> template
> > creation + deletion.
> > >>
> > >> - Si
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>
> > >> From: "Ilya Musayev" <im...@webmd.net>
> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:04:27 PM
> > >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
> > >>
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> > >>
> > >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog
> > >> ;h
> > >> =refs/heads/4.1
> > >> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
> > >>
> > >> Release notes:
> > >>
> > >> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23
> > >> /
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > >> location):
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
> > >>
> > >> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > >>
> > >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >>
> > >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1 approve
> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >>
> > >> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nicolas Lamirault
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________
> >
> __________________________________________________________
> > _____
> >
> > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses,
> > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message
> > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi
> > que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles
> > d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere,
> deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> >
> > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
> > privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not
> > be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> > delete this message and its attachments.
> > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
> > been modified, changed or falsified.
> > Thank you.
> >
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by "Musayev, Ilya" <im...@webmd.net>.
Nicolas,
This issue exists in 4.1.0, 4.2.0 and as you can see has not been fixed in 4.1.1
Since no-one is assigned to work on this ticket and we made no claims that it has been fixed in 4.1.1, IMHO posting "-1" is a bit too harsh.
While I am all for fixing this issue and will also look into this problem (we are vpshere shop and I did not know if this problem), we need to raise awareness on this bug and not block 4.1.1 release, because this specific issue has not yet been addressed. We did address about 20+ bug fixes. If we were to follow a methodology of blocking every single release because a specific issue exists and has not been addressed, there is a good chance we will never release anything.
As you know, open source projects are ran by volunteers (and while many developers are paid by company X), in general we do not make commitments of any kind - we can try out best, but if it does not happen, we will try on the next release. Therefore ACS community cannot guarantee that issue X or feature Y will be added or resolved in the next release.
With that in mind, let's work on raising awareness for this problem.
Regards
ilya
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nicolas.lamirault@orange.com [mailto:nicolas.lamirault@orange.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 3:26 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
>
> Hi,
>
> -1 due to the opened issue :
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2895
>
> Le 26/07/2013 05:42, Marcus Sorensen a écrit :
> > +1 binding, CentOS 6.4. Used devcloud-kvm advanced zone marvin config,
> > started up a VPC, registered a template, started a VM. Tested NFS,
> > local, CLVM primary storage.
> >
> > One of these days I'll get around to making an Ubuntu devcloud-kvm.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Simon Weller <sw...@ena.com> wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Built NONOSS rpms and deployed on RHEL 6.3
> >>
> >> Tested vm creation + deletion, network creation + deletion, template
> creation + deletion.
> >>
> >> - Si
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>
> >> From: "Ilya Musayev" <im...@webmd.net>
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:04:27 PM
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >>
> >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h
> >> =refs/heads/4.1
> >> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
> >>
> >> Release notes:
> >>
> >> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
> >>
> >>
> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> >> location):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
> >>
> >> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >>
> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 approve
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Nicolas Lamirault
>
> __________________________________________________________
> __________________________________________________________
> _____
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites
> ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez
> le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les
> messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute
> responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed,
> used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by ni...@orange.com.
Hi,
-1 due to the opened issue :
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2895
Le 26/07/2013 05:42, Marcus Sorensen a écrit :
> +1 binding, CentOS 6.4. Used devcloud-kvm advanced zone marvin config,
> started up a VPC, registered a template, started a VM. Tested NFS,
> local, CLVM primary storage.
>
> One of these days I'll get around to making an Ubuntu devcloud-kvm.
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Simon Weller <sw...@ena.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Built NONOSS rpms and deployed on RHEL 6.3
>>
>> Tested vm creation + deletion, network creation + deletion, template creation + deletion.
>>
>> - Si
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>
>> From: "Ilya Musayev" <im...@webmd.net>
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:04:27 PM
>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
>> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>>
>> Release notes:
>>
>> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
>>
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>>
>
>
--
Nicolas Lamirault
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding, CentOS 6.4. Used devcloud-kvm advanced zone marvin config,
started up a VPC, registered a template, started a VM. Tested NFS,
local, CLVM primary storage.
One of these days I'll get around to making an Ubuntu devcloud-kvm.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Simon Weller <sw...@ena.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Built NONOSS rpms and deployed on RHEL 6.3
>
> Tested vm creation + deletion, network creation + deletion, template creation + deletion.
>
> - Si
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Ilya Musayev" <im...@webmd.net>
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:04:27 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
> Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
> Release notes:
>
> http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
>
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Posted by Simon Weller <sw...@ena.com>.
+1
Built NONOSS rpms and deployed on RHEL 6.3
Tested vm creation + deletion, network creation + deletion, template creation + deletion.
- Si
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ilya Musayev" <im...@webmd.net>
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 1:04:27 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)
Hi All,
I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1
Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718
Release notes:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/4.1/job/docs-4.1-releasenotes/23/
Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.1/
PGP release keys (signed using B7B5E7FD):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
d2c646f0a434831bd5aef88b5692c108fe26e718