You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/10 08:56:19 UTC

Re: svn commit: r897459 - in /camel/trunk: camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/ camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/converter/ camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/model/dataformat/ camel-core/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/component

Hi

Is woodstock needed as compile dep? Or only at test scope?

+        <dependency>
+               <groupId>org.codehaus.woodstox</groupId>
+               <artifactId>wstx-asl</artifactId>
+               <version>3.2.9</version>
+        </dependency>

Maybe <scope>test</scope> is sufficient to avoid bring in more dep at runtime?

And why do you need it now?

Re: svn commit: r897459 - in /camel/trunk: camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/ camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/converter/ camel-core/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/model/dataformat/ camel-core/src/test/java/org/apache/camel/component

Posted by Willem Jiang <wi...@gmail.com>.

Hi Claus,

The scope should be test, since we introduce the stax XMLWriter in 
camel-jaxb, the stax implementation (JDK 1.6 already includes the stax 
API and implementation) should be add for running the test :)
I will did quick fix for that.

Willem

Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Is woodstock needed as compile dep? Or only at test scope?
> 
> +        <dependency>
> +               <groupId>org.codehaus.woodstox</groupId>
> +               <artifactId>wstx-asl</artifactId>
> +               <version>3.2.9</version>
> +        </dependency>
> 
> Maybe <scope>test</scope> is sufficient to avoid bring in more dep at runtime?
> 
> And why do you need it now?
>