You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Peter Royal <pr...@apache.org> on 2003/04/16 16:00:07 UTC
Fwd: mx4j + phoenix
Begin forwarded message:
> From: HORNYAK Laszlo <ho...@inf.elte.hu>
> Date: Fri Apr 11, 2003 4:40:57 AM US/Eastern
> To: proyal@apache.org
> Subject: mx4j + phoenix
>
> Hi!
>
> Please forward to the list if you find it usefull.
>
> Many people asked about it, so I wrote a very short howto on making
> mc4j gui work with phoenix. It is available here:
> http://people.inf.elte.hu/hornyakl/jmx_hacking/
>
> There are screenshots too.
>
> Ayway, why doesn`t phoenix start when there is 0 deployed
> applications? I think it could be usefull to let it start without it,
> and let admin deploy them later.
>
> Laszlo Hornyak
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org
Re: mx4j + phoenix
Posted by Johan Sjöberg <jo...@avaintec.com>.
Peter Royal wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 06:35 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:00, Peter Royal wrote:
>>
>>>> Many people asked about it, so I wrote a very short howto on making
>>>> mc4j gui work with phoenix. It is available here:
>>>> http://people.inf.elte.hu/hornyakl/jmx_hacking/
>>>
>>
>> Has anyone been able to access this site?
Once here too, but I have the files locally. Just ping me for them if
you can't access the site again.
//
Johan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org
Re: mx4j + phoenix
Posted by Peter Royal <pr...@apache.org>.
On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 06:35 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:00, Peter Royal wrote:
>>> Many people asked about it, so I wrote a very short howto on making
>>> mc4j gui work with phoenix. It is available here:
>>> http://people.inf.elte.hu/hornyakl/jmx_hacking/
>
> Has anyone been able to access this site?
I was able to once, shortly after I received the original message (a
week ago, maybe).. I have not been able to get there today.
-pete
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org
Re: Fwd: mx4j + phoenix
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@realityforge.org>.
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:00, Peter Royal wrote:
> > Many people asked about it, so I wrote a very short howto on making
> > mc4j gui work with phoenix. It is available here:
> > http://people.inf.elte.hu/hornyakl/jmx_hacking/
Has anyone been able to access this site?
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, and a dark side, and
it binds the universe together ...
-- Carl Zwanzig
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org
Re: Fwd: mx4j + phoenix
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@ThoughtWorks.net>.
Peter,
>--persistent on CLI worked at one stage but I vaguely recall having it
>reported as not working. Need some unit tests to make sure it works in future
>;)
>
>
Unit testing main() ? - you are teh spawn of the Devil!
- Paul
--
http://www.thoughtworks.com : The art of heavy lifting.
Home for many Agile-practicing Open Source activists...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org
Re: Fwd: mx4j + phoenix
Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@realityforge.org>.
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:09, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Peter,
>
> >> Ayway, why doesn`t phoenix start when there is 0 deployed
> >> applications? I think it could be usefull to let it start without it,
> >> and let admin deploy them later.
>
> Good point.
>
> Some setting in kernel.conf ?
--persistent on CLI worked at one stage but I vaguely recall having it
reported as not working. Need some unit tests to make sure it works in future
;)
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Dating a women is like driving in a foreign country. You
don't know what side of the road your on, you can't understand
the signs and you certainly don't want to ask for directions
but it usually worth the ride.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org
Re: mx4j + phoenix
Posted by Peter Royal <pr...@apache.org>.
On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 10:09 AM, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Peter,
>
>>> Ayway, why doesn`t phoenix start when there is 0 deployed
>>> applications? I think it could be usefull to let it start without
>>> it, and let admin deploy them later.
>>
> Good point.
>
> Some setting in kernel.conf ?
-p or --persistent on the command line looks like it will do it in 4.1.
I have not tested this though.
-pete
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org
Re: Fwd: mx4j + phoenix
Posted by Paul Hammant <Pa...@ThoughtWorks.net>.
Peter,
>> Ayway, why doesn`t phoenix start when there is 0 deployed
>> applications? I think it could be usefull to let it start without it,
>> and let admin deploy them later.
>
Good point.
Some setting in kernel.conf ?
- Paul
--
http://www.thoughtworks.com : The art of heavy lifting.
Home for many Agile-practicing Open Source activists...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@avalon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@avalon.apache.org