You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@infra.apache.org by "Mark Thomas (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/02/16 01:14:27 UTC
[jira] Updated: (INFRA-2493) Wrong attachment referenced in
comments
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mark Thomas updated INFRA-2493:
-------------------------------
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
Maybe... although I'm far from convinced it is worth the hassle - particularly since it adds a burden on every future upgrade.
If someone feels like writing a patch then I think I'd prefer not creating the link if:
n < 10
AND
n is not a valid attachment id for the current bug
Even then, the invasiveness of the patch would be a large factor in whether or not it was applied.
> Wrong attachment referenced in comments
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: INFRA-2493
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2493
> Project: Infrastructure
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: Bugzilla
> Environment: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48650
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> [This may be a Bugzilla bug, or it may be due to the local modifications, which is why I am posting here first.]
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48650 has comments 6,7 & 8 which reference attachments, however the attachment references are for completely different bugs.
> e.g. Comment 6 references:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2
> Comment 7 references the correct attachment (24985), as well as:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.