You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@iceberg.apache.org by Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com> on 2023/07/06 22:53:26 UTC
[DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Hi
I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for 1.3.1, a
patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found
by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277.
Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also let me
know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give it a
shot as well.
Thanks,
Szehon
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>.
Thanks all for the interest and help. The last change we have on the 1.3.1
milestone is now merged, I will work on the release candidate and send a
vote next week.
Thanks
Szehon
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 1:18 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Szehon,
>
> Thank you for the updates. I'm in favor of 1.3.1 as well. I got notified
> of a discrepancy <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8049> in Java's
> TableMetadata reader today. I have a fix here
> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8050> against the master branch.
> Once that is in, I think it would be great to backport this to 1.3.x as
> well.
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
> Op wo 12 jul 2023 om 22:09 schreef Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi guys
>>
>> Just an update on this. Another issue came up about the new 1.3.0
>> function rewrite_position_deletes (thanks Fokko for adding to the
>> milestone). I'm working on that, hopefully can finish in next day or two,
>> for this release.
>>
>> Milestone for reference:
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestones/Iceberg%201.3.1
>>
>> Thanks
>> Szehon
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 11:14 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Eduard! Merged all your backport prs, I will commit the last one
>>> probably tomorrow and then we can start the release.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Szehon
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 11:53 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I created a 1.3.x <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1.3.x>
>>>> branch, so that we can start backporting those bug fixes.
>>>>
>>>> Eduard
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks a lot Eduard! I think
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7933 is also a good candidate
>>>>> as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Szehon
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:07 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 release. I've created a 1.3.1 Milestone
>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Iceberg+1.3.1%22+is%3Aclosed>
>>>>>> and it would be great to also get #7621
>>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7621> in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eduard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:52 PM Ryan Blue <bl...@tabular.io> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 to fix the Hive issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For the Nessie changes, those seem outside what we would normally
>>>>>>> put in a patch release. Patch releases are for bug fixes and aren't usually
>>>>>>> a time to get other changes in for convenience. I can understand wanting to
>>>>>>> unblock a Trino issue, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In addition, why not put some of these classes in the Nessie project
>>>>>>> itself? Could NessieUtil go there so that you aren't waiting on Iceberg
>>>>>>> releases to fix third-party projects?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Hi
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for
>>>>>>>> 1.3.1, a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found
>>>>>>>> by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also
>>>>>>>> let me know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give
>>>>>>>> it a shot as well.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>>>> > Szehon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>> Tabular
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>.
Hi Szehon,
Thank you for the updates. I'm in favor of 1.3.1 as well. I got notified of
a discrepancy <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8049> in Java's
TableMetadata reader today. I have a fix here
<https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/8050> against the master branch.
Once that is in, I think it would be great to backport this to 1.3.x as
well.
Kind regards,
Fokko
Op wo 12 jul 2023 om 22:09 schreef Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>:
> Hi guys
>
> Just an update on this. Another issue came up about the new 1.3.0
> function rewrite_position_deletes (thanks Fokko for adding to the
> milestone). I'm working on that, hopefully can finish in next day or two,
> for this release.
>
> Milestone for reference:
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestones/Iceberg%201.3.1
>
> Thanks
> Szehon
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 11:14 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Eduard! Merged all your backport prs, I will commit the last one
>> probably tomorrow and then we can start the release.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Szehon
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 11:53 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I created a 1.3.x <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1.3.x>
>>> branch, so that we can start backporting those bug fixes.
>>>
>>> Eduard
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot Eduard! I think
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7933 is also a good candidate
>>>> as well.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Szehon
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:07 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 release. I've created a 1.3.1 Milestone
>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Iceberg+1.3.1%22+is%3Aclosed>
>>>>> and it would be great to also get #7621
>>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7621> in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eduard
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:52 PM Ryan Blue <bl...@tabular.io> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 to fix the Hive issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the Nessie changes, those seem outside what we would normally put
>>>>>> in a patch release. Patch releases are for bug fixes and aren't usually a
>>>>>> time to get other changes in for convenience. I can understand wanting to
>>>>>> unblock a Trino issue, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In addition, why not put some of these classes in the Nessie project
>>>>>> itself? Could NessieUtil go there so that you aren't waiting on Iceberg
>>>>>> releases to fix third-party projects?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Hi
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for
>>>>>>> 1.3.1, a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found
>>>>>>> by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also
>>>>>>> let me know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give
>>>>>>> it a shot as well.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>>> > Szehon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>> Tabular
>>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>.
Hi guys
Just an update on this. Another issue came up about the new 1.3.0 function
rewrite_position_deletes (thanks Fokko for adding to the milestone). I'm
working on that, hopefully can finish in next day or two, for this release.
Milestone for reference:
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/milestones/Iceberg%201.3.1
Thanks
Szehon
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 11:14 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Eduard! Merged all your backport prs, I will commit the last one
> probably tomorrow and then we can start the release.
>
> Thanks
> Szehon
>
> On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 11:53 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
> wrote:
>
>> I created a 1.3.x <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1.3.x> branch,
>> so that we can start backporting those bug fixes.
>>
>> Eduard
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks a lot Eduard! I think
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7933 is also a good candidate as
>>> well.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Szehon
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:07 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 release. I've created a 1.3.1 Milestone
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Iceberg+1.3.1%22+is%3Aclosed>
>>>> and it would be great to also get #7621
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7621> in.
>>>>
>>>> Eduard
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:52 PM Ryan Blue <bl...@tabular.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 to fix the Hive issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the Nessie changes, those seem outside what we would normally put
>>>>> in a patch release. Patch releases are for bug fixes and aren't usually a
>>>>> time to get other changes in for convenience. I can understand wanting to
>>>>> unblock a Trino issue, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> In addition, why not put some of these classes in the Nessie project
>>>>> itself? Could NessieUtil go there so that you aren't waiting on Iceberg
>>>>> releases to fix third-party projects?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ryan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Hi
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for
>>>>>> 1.3.1, a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found
>>>>>> by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also
>>>>>> let me know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give
>>>>>> it a shot as well.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>>> > Szehon
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>> Tabular
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Eduard! Merged all your backport prs, I will commit the last one
probably tomorrow and then we can start the release.
Thanks
Szehon
On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 11:53 PM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
wrote:
> I created a 1.3.x <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1.3.x> branch,
> so that we can start backporting those bug fixes.
>
> Eduard
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks a lot Eduard! I think https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7933
>> is also a good candidate as well.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Szehon
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:07 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 release. I've created a 1.3.1 Milestone
>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Iceberg+1.3.1%22+is%3Aclosed>
>>> and it would be great to also get #7621
>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7621> in.
>>>
>>> Eduard
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:52 PM Ryan Blue <bl...@tabular.io> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 to fix the Hive issue.
>>>>
>>>> For the Nessie changes, those seem outside what we would normally put
>>>> in a patch release. Patch releases are for bug fixes and aren't usually a
>>>> time to get other changes in for convenience. I can understand wanting to
>>>> unblock a Trino issue, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me.
>>>>
>>>> In addition, why not put some of these classes in the Nessie project
>>>> itself? Could NessieUtil go there so that you aren't waiting on Iceberg
>>>> releases to fix third-party projects?
>>>>
>>>> Ryan
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Hi
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for
>>>>> 1.3.1, a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found
>>>>> by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277
>>>>> .
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also
>>>>> let me know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give
>>>>> it a shot as well.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Thanks,
>>>>> > Szehon
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>> Tabular
>>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>.
I created a 1.3.x <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/tree/1.3.x> branch, so
that we can start backporting those bug fixes.
Eduard
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:52 PM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Eduard! I think https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7933
> is also a good candidate as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Szehon
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:07 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for a 1.3.1 release. I've created a 1.3.1 Milestone
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Iceberg+1.3.1%22+is%3Aclosed>
>> and it would be great to also get #7621
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7621> in.
>>
>> Eduard
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:52 PM Ryan Blue <bl...@tabular.io> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for a 1.3.1 to fix the Hive issue.
>>>
>>> For the Nessie changes, those seem outside what we would normally put in
>>> a patch release. Patch releases are for bug fixes and aren't usually a time
>>> to get other changes in for convenience. I can understand wanting to
>>> unblock a Trino issue, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me.
>>>
>>> In addition, why not put some of these classes in the Nessie project
>>> itself? Could NessieUtil go there so that you aren't waiting on Iceberg
>>> releases to fix third-party projects?
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks !
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi
>>>> >
>>>> > I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for
>>>> 1.3.1, a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found
>>>> by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
>>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277
>>>> .
>>>> >
>>>> > Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also let
>>>> me know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give it a
>>>> shot as well.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > Szehon
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ryan Blue
>>> Tabular
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>.
Thanks a lot Eduard! I think https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7933
is also a good candidate as well.
Thanks,
Szehon
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:07 AM Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>
wrote:
> +1 for a 1.3.1 release. I've created a 1.3.1 Milestone
> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Iceberg+1.3.1%22+is%3Aclosed>
> and it would be great to also get #7621
> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7621> in.
>
> Eduard
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:52 PM Ryan Blue <bl...@tabular.io> wrote:
>
>> +1 for a 1.3.1 to fix the Hive issue.
>>
>> For the Nessie changes, those seem outside what we would normally put in
>> a patch release. Patch releases are for bug fixes and aren't usually a time
>> to get other changes in for convenience. I can understand wanting to
>> unblock a Trino issue, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me.
>>
>> In addition, why not put some of these classes in the Nessie project
>> itself? Could NessieUtil go there so that you aren't waiting on Iceberg
>> releases to fix third-party projects?
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1.
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi
>>> >
>>> > I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for
>>> 1.3.1, a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found
>>> by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
>>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277
>>> .
>>> >
>>> > Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also let
>>> me know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give it a
>>> shot as well.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Szehon
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>> Tabular
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Eduard Tudenhoefner <ed...@tabular.io>.
+1 for a 1.3.1 release. I've created a 1.3.1 Milestone
<https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Iceberg+1.3.1%22+is%3Aclosed>
and it would be great to also get #7621
<https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7621> in.
Eduard
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:52 PM Ryan Blue <bl...@tabular.io> wrote:
> +1 for a 1.3.1 to fix the Hive issue.
>
> For the Nessie changes, those seem outside what we would normally put in a
> patch release. Patch releases are for bug fixes and aren't usually a time
> to get other changes in for convenience. I can understand wanting to
> unblock a Trino issue, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me.
>
> In addition, why not put some of these classes in the Nessie project
> itself? Could NessieUtil go there so that you aren't waiting on Iceberg
> releases to fix third-party projects?
>
> Ryan
>
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1.
>>
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for
>> 1.3.1, a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found
>> by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277.
>> >
>> > Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also let
>> me know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give it a
>> shot as well.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Szehon
>>
>
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
> Tabular
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Ryan Blue <bl...@tabular.io>.
+1 for a 1.3.1 to fix the Hive issue.
For the Nessie changes, those seem outside what we would normally put in a
patch release. Patch releases are for bug fixes and aren't usually a time
to get other changes in for convenience. I can understand wanting to
unblock a Trino issue, but it doesn't seem like a good choice to me.
In addition, why not put some of these classes in the Nessie project
itself? Could NessieUtil go there so that you aren't waiting on Iceberg
releases to fix third-party projects?
Ryan
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:02 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for 1.3.1,
> a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found by
> Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277.
> >
> > Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also let me
> know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give it a
> shot as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Szehon
>
--
Ryan Blue
Tabular
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi,
It sounds good to me to have 1.3.1.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 12:53 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for 1.3.1, a patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) : https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277.
>
> Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also let me know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give it a shot as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Szehon
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Iceberg Release 1.3.1
Posted by Ajantha Bhat <aj...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the 1.3.1 release as it is a functional bug for Hive catalog.
While we are at it, I would like to have
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7893
as part of 1.3.1 which can unblock the Trino side bug fix for Nessie.
Note:
We also need https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7641 for a smooth
cherry-pick of the above Nessie PR.
Thanks,
Ajantha
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 4:23 AM Szehon Ho <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wanted to start a discussion for whether its the right time for 1.3.1, a
> patch release of 1.3.0. It was started based on the issue found
> by Xiangyang (@ConeyLiu) :
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7931#pullrequestreview-1507935277.
>
> Do people have any other bug fixes that should be included? Also let me
> know, if anyone wants to be a release manager? If not, I can give it a
> shot as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Szehon
>