You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org by Vladimir Dudov <du...@relexus.com> on 2003/11/04 20:45:54 UTC
mod_apreq without perl
How do I build/install mod_apreq.so for Windows and Linux if I don't
need Perl code at all?
What are the prerequisites? Do I still need mod_perl, apache-test etc.?
Thank you,
Vladimir Dudov
Re: [VOTE] 2.01-dev-rc2
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
>
>>Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>>Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca> writes:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>
>>>>Thanks for pointing that out - I missed that. It's
>>>>been fixed in the current cvs version.
>>>
>>>It'll be in the 2.01-dev release.
>>
>>Please check that 2.01-dev-rc2 has the necessary Win32
>>fixes.
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.01-dev-rc2.tar.gz
>
>
> +1 - this builds fine on Win32, and all tests pass (a couple
> of fixes to mod_perl/Apache-Test are needed regarding the
> presence of /dev/null, which I've submitted).
which also means that you need to PREREQ_PM Apache::Test 1.06, which is due to
be released early next week.
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
Re: [VOTE] 2.01-dev-rc2
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com> writes:
>
> > Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > > Thanks for pointing that out - I missed that. It's
> > > been fixed in the current cvs version.
> >
> > It'll be in the 2.01-dev release.
>
> Please check that 2.01-dev-rc2 has the necessary Win32
> fixes.
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.01-dev-rc2.tar.gz
+1 - this builds fine on Win32, and all tests pass (a couple
of fixes to mod_perl/Apache-Test are needed regarding the
presence of /dev/null, which I've submitted).
--
best regards,
randy
Re: [VOTE] 2.01-dev-rc2
Posted by Stas Bekman <st...@stason.org>.
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Please check that 2.01-dev-rc2 has the necessary Win32
> fixes.
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.01-dev-rc2.tar.gz
>
> As soon as we get a few +1's, I'll move forward with that
> tarball. btw- after acceptance, should I rename it
> "libapreq2-2.01_02-dev.tar.gz" for CPAN (relying on the
> indexer to ignore the package because of the underscore
> in the version string)? Or is CPAN smart enough to ignore
> "libapreq2-2.01-dev.tar.gz"?
it needs _ in the name.
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:stas@stason.org http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
[VOTE] 2.01-dev-rc2
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com>.
Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com> writes:
> Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca> writes:
[...]
> > Thanks for pointing that out - I missed that. It's
> > been fixed in the current cvs version.
>
> It'll be in the 2.01-dev release.
Please check that 2.01-dev-rc2 has the necessary Win32
fixes.
http://httpd.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-2.01-dev-rc2.tar.gz
As soon as we get a few +1's, I'll move forward with that
tarball. btw- after acceptance, should I rename it
"libapreq2-2.01_02-dev.tar.gz" for CPAN (relying on the
indexer to ignore the package because of the underscore
in the version string)? Or is CPAN smart enough to ignore
"libapreq2-2.01-dev.tar.gz"?
--
Joe Schaefer
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com>.
Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca> writes:
> I forgot about the build/version_check.pl script checking
> things - you're right that it does demand mod_perl
> and Apache-Test. I guess in principle these could be
> relaxed if not building the perl glue (for mod_perl) and/or
> testing (for Apache-Test).
My thinking on having the mp2/apache_test checks in Makefile.PL
was that, for *nix, folks that run '% perl Makefile.PL'
want to install the perl glue. People that don't should use ./configure.
I guess it's possible to expect/document a similar dichotomy
for win32/Configure.pl, but the current INSTALL document is
a bit too brief for this :-). Otherwise we can move the
mp2/Apache-Test checks into the non-Win32 section of Makefile.PL.
> > Another problem:
> > libapreq2.mak references apreq_tables.c(.obj) which is not in src\
> > folder anymore.
>
> Thanks for pointing that out - I missed that. It's
> been fixed in the current cvs version.
It'll be in the 2.01-dev release.
--
Joe Schaefer
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Vladimir Dudov wrote:
> Finally I got libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so. But I had to switch from
> cugwin to ActivePerl.
>
> A couple problems:
> If I run *perl Makefile.PL --without-perl *without installed Apache-Test
> and mod-perl it complains:
> /perl: 5.8.0 ok
> Can't locate Apache/Test.pm in @INC (@INC contains: C:/Perl/lib
> C:/Perl/site/lib .) at build/version_ch
> eck.pl line 18.
> Please upgrade apache_test first. at Makefile.PL line 13.
> /
> When I installed Apahce-Test and run *perl Makefile.PL --without-perl,
> *it reported:
> /perl: 5.8.0 ok
> apache_test: 1.03 ok
> Can't locate mod_perl.pm in @INC (@INC contains: C:/Perl/lib
> C:/Perl/site/lib .) at build/version_check
> .pl line 28.
> Please upgrade mp2 first. at Makefile.PL line 13.
> /
> Only when I got mod_perl installed I could run *perl Makefile.PL
> --without-perl *sucessfully.
I forgot about the build/version_check.pl script checking
things - you're right that it does demand mod_perl
and Apache-Test. I guess in principle these could be
relaxed if not building the perl glue (for mod_perl) and/or
testing (for Apache-Test).
> Another problem:
> libapreq2.mak references apreq_tables.c(.obj) which is not in src\
> folder anymore.
Thanks for pointing that out - I missed that. It's
been fixed in the current cvs version.
--
best regards,
randy
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Vladimir Dudov <du...@relexus.com>.
Finally I got libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so. But I had to switch from
cugwin to ActivePerl.
A couple problems:
If I run *perl Makefile.PL --without-perl *without installed Apache-Test
and mod-perl it complains:
/perl: 5.8.0 ok
Can't locate Apache/Test.pm in @INC (@INC contains: C:/Perl/lib
C:/Perl/site/lib .) at build/version_ch
eck.pl line 18.
Please upgrade apache_test first. at Makefile.PL line 13.
/
When I installed Apahce-Test and run *perl Makefile.PL --without-perl,
*it reported:
/perl: 5.8.0 ok
apache_test: 1.03 ok
Can't locate mod_perl.pm in @INC (@INC contains: C:/Perl/lib
C:/Perl/site/lib .) at build/version_check
.pl line 28.
Please upgrade mp2 first. at Makefile.PL line 13.
/
Only when I got mod_perl installed I could run *perl Makefile.PL
--without-perl *sucessfully.
Another problem:
libapreq2.mak references apreq_tables.c(.obj) which is not in src\
folder anymore.
--Vladimir
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Vladimir Dudov wrote:
>
>
>
>>What if I don't need any tests do I still need ApacheTest
>>and mod_perl to build just libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so?
>>
>>
>
>No, you don't need either in that case, in principle. This
>should work with VC++:
>
> C:\httpd-apreq-2> perl Makefile.PL --without-perl
> C:\httpd-apreq-2> nmake
> C:\httpd-apreq-2> nmake test
>
>The last line should run the tests under httpd-apreq-2/t/,
>which don't depend on Apache-Test, but then will fail
>when it tries the httpd-apreq-2/env/t/ tests, which do
>require Apache-Test. After this, libapreq2.dll and
>mod_apreq.so should be under httpd-apreq-2/win32/libs/.
>
>I'm not sure about cygwin - does it refuse to build
>without Apache::Test? You can install Apache-Test
>independently of mod_perl - the sources are at
> http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GE/GEOFF/
>
>
>
>>Anybody knows by chance how to uninstall ApacheTest 1.29? (I installed
>>it by mistake and AT 1.99 asks to uninstall 1.29
>>before it goes any further. I run "make uninstall" but doesn't seem
>>enough and AT 1.99 keeps asking to uninstall 1.29).
>>I am using cygwin/perl.
>>
>>--Vladimir
>>
>>
>
>Do you mean mod_perl, rather than Apache::Test? There's not
>a 'make uninstall' capability; one thing to try is to go
>into the blib/ directory where you built mod_perl, see what
>files are there, and then remove manually the corresponding
>files under your Perl tree. Alternatively, you can build
>mod_perl 1.99_xx as
> perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=/path/to/Apache2 \
> MP_INST_APACHE2=1
>which will install mod_perl 1.99 relative to an Apache2/
>subdirectory in your Perl tree, so that mod_perl 1.99 and
>mod_perl 1.2x can coexist. With this you then have to 'use
>Apache2' in your Perl scripts (or in a startup file) when
>using mod_perl-1.99, which adjusts the @INC to find the
>appropriate files.
>
>
>
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Vladimir Dudov wrote:
> What if I don't need any tests do I still need ApacheTest
> and mod_perl to build just libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so?
No, you don't need either in that case, in principle. This
should work with VC++:
C:\httpd-apreq-2> perl Makefile.PL --without-perl
C:\httpd-apreq-2> nmake
C:\httpd-apreq-2> nmake test
The last line should run the tests under httpd-apreq-2/t/,
which don't depend on Apache-Test, but then will fail
when it tries the httpd-apreq-2/env/t/ tests, which do
require Apache-Test. After this, libapreq2.dll and
mod_apreq.so should be under httpd-apreq-2/win32/libs/.
I'm not sure about cygwin - does it refuse to build
without Apache::Test? You can install Apache-Test
independently of mod_perl - the sources are at
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GE/GEOFF/
> Anybody knows by chance how to uninstall ApacheTest 1.29? (I installed
> it by mistake and AT 1.99 asks to uninstall 1.29
> before it goes any further. I run "make uninstall" but doesn't seem
> enough and AT 1.99 keeps asking to uninstall 1.29).
> I am using cygwin/perl.
>
> --Vladimir
Do you mean mod_perl, rather than Apache::Test? There's not
a 'make uninstall' capability; one thing to try is to go
into the blib/ directory where you built mod_perl, see what
files are there, and then remove manually the corresponding
files under your Perl tree. Alternatively, you can build
mod_perl 1.99_xx as
perl Makefile.PL MP_AP_PREFIX=/path/to/Apache2 \
MP_INST_APACHE2=1
which will install mod_perl 1.99 relative to an Apache2/
subdirectory in your Perl tree, so that mod_perl 1.99 and
mod_perl 1.2x can coexist. With this you then have to 'use
Apache2' in your Perl scripts (or in a startup file) when
using mod_perl-1.99, which adjusts the @INC to find the
appropriate files.
--
best regards,
randy
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Vladimir Dudov <du...@relexus.com>.
What if I don't need any tests do I still need ApacheTest and mod_perl
to build just libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so?
Anybody knows by chance how to uninstall ApacheTest 1.29? (I installed
it by mistake and AT 1.99 asks to uninstall 1.29
before it goes any further. I run "make uninstall" but doesn't seem
enough and AT 1.99 keeps asking to uninstall 1.29).
I am using cygwin/perl.
--Vladimir
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Vladimir Dudov wrote:
>
>
>
>>"perl Makefile.PL" doesn't work without apache-test. What
>>perl distribution should I use to get a working
>>apache-test?
>>
>>
>
>You have a few choices:
>
>- If you have CPAN.pm configured, you can do
> C:\> perl -MCPAN -e shell
> cpan> install Apache::Test
>
>- Grab the Apache-Test sources from
> http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GE/GEOFF/
>and run the standard
> perl Makefile.PL
> nmake
> nmake test
> nmake install
>in the unpacked directory (you may have to specify the path
>to your Apache2 binary to get the tests to work).
>
>- If you're using ActivePerl, you can do
> C:\> ppm install http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/Apache-Test.ppd
>for ActivePerl version 8xx, or
> C:\> ppm install http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppmpackages/Apache-Test.ppd
>for ActivePerl version 6xx.
>
>
>
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Vladimir Dudov wrote:
> "perl Makefile.PL" doesn't work without apache-test. What
> perl distribution should I use to get a working
> apache-test?
You have a few choices:
- If you have CPAN.pm configured, you can do
C:\> perl -MCPAN -e shell
cpan> install Apache::Test
- Grab the Apache-Test sources from
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/G/GE/GEOFF/
and run the standard
perl Makefile.PL
nmake
nmake test
nmake install
in the unpacked directory (you may have to specify the path
to your Apache2 binary to get the tests to work).
- If you're using ActivePerl, you can do
C:\> ppm install http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/Apache-Test.ppd
for ActivePerl version 8xx, or
C:\> ppm install http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppmpackages/Apache-Test.ppd
for ActivePerl version 6xx.
--
best regards,
randy
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Vladimir Dudov <du...@relexus.com>.
"perl Makefile.PL" doesn't work without apache-test.
What perl distribution should I use to get a working apache-test?
--Vladimir
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Vladimir Dudov wrote:
>
>
>
>>I would like build libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so by myself. What are
>>the required steps?
>>
>>
>
>Assuming VC++, all that should be required is, from the
>httpd-apreq-2 top-level directory,
>
> perl Makefile.PL
> nmake
> nmake test
> nmake install
>
>The tests under env/t/ need Apache-Test. The first line may
>need some input from you if it can't find the Apache2
>directory; you can specify this explicitly as
>
> perl Makefile.PL --with-apache2=/path/to/installed/Apache2
>
>This might also lead to a dialogue asking if you want to
>install a Win32 version of apxs, which will be needed to run
>the tests under env/t/.
>
>
>
>>You got my vote for Win32 binaries as well.
>>
>>
>
>Thanks - I'll do that.
>
>
>
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Vladimir Dudov wrote:
> I would like build libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so by myself. What are
> the required steps?
Assuming VC++, all that should be required is, from the
httpd-apreq-2 top-level directory,
perl Makefile.PL
nmake
nmake test
nmake install
The tests under env/t/ need Apache-Test. The first line may
need some input from you if it can't find the Apache2
directory; you can specify this explicitly as
perl Makefile.PL --with-apache2=/path/to/installed/Apache2
This might also lead to a dialogue asking if you want to
install a Win32 version of apxs, which will be needed to run
the tests under env/t/.
> You got my vote for Win32 binaries as well.
Thanks - I'll do that.
--
best regards,
randy
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Vladimir Dudov <du...@relexus.com>.
I would like build libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so by myself. What are
the required steps?
You got my vote for Win32 binaries as well.
--Vladimir
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
>
>
>>Vladimir Dudov <du...@relexus.com> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>How do I build/install mod_apreq.so for Windows
>>>
>>>
>>What say ye, Randy?
>>
>>
>
>For Windows, as well as Apache-Test for running the tests
>under env/t/, VC++ is required to build (as it's currently
>configured under the win32/ subdirectory). If there's a
>demand (> 0 persons) I could make available a precompiled
>libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so for Win32, which should be
>compatible with the Apache-2 Win32 binary from
>httpd.apache.org.
>
>
>
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Randy Kobes <ra...@theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca>.
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Vladimir Dudov <du...@relexus.com> writes:
>
> > How do I build/install mod_apreq.so for Windows
>
> What say ye, Randy?
For Windows, as well as Apache-Test for running the tests
under env/t/, VC++ is required to build (as it's currently
configured under the win32/ subdirectory). If there's a
demand (> 0 persons) I could make available a precompiled
libapreq2.dll and mod_apreq.so for Win32, which should be
compatible with the Apache-2 Win32 binary from
httpd.apache.org.
--
best regards,
randy
Re: mod_apreq without perl
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@sunstarsys.com>.
Vladimir Dudov <du...@relexus.com> writes:
> How do I build/install mod_apreq.so for Windows
What say ye, Randy?
> and Linux if I don't need Perl code at all? What are the
> prerequisites?
apache2: 2.0.46
apr: 0.9.4
apu: 0.9.4
perl: 5.6.1
I think you only need perl for running build/version_check.pl
and running the test suite.
> Do I still need mod_perl,
No.
> apache-test etc.?
Yes, if you plan to
% make test
--
Joe Schaefer