another release candidate?

[Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>]

I have just patched 10.4 to handle DERBY-3616. That bug turns out to be 
a fairly disabling problem for Table Functions. Because of DERBY-3616, 
Table Functions may or may not be usable on a given platform, depending 
on the platform's default string encoding. In particular, Table 
Functions turned out to be unusable on Ubuntu 7, which is a fairly 
popular platform. I recommend cutting a new release candidate for this 
fix. I would like to spend a day doing some more platform testing of 
this feature first, though.

Regards,
-Rick

Re: another release candidate?

[Dy...@Sun.COM]

Bryan Pendleton <bp...@amberpoint.com> writes:

> Dyre.Tjeldvoll@Sun.COM wrote:
>> seems like DERBY-3603 is about to be merged to 10.4 as well so I guess
>> I'll wait for that.
>
> Thanks Dyre! DERBY-3603 fix is now in the 10.4 branch; my tests were
> successful so I committed the merged change.

OK, then I'll start spinning another RC. Please shout if there are other
blockers I should be waiting for.

-- 
dt

Re: another release candidate?

[Bryan Pendleton <bp...@amberpoint.com>]

Dyre.Tjeldvoll@Sun.COM wrote:
> seems like DERBY-3603 is about to be merged to 10.4 as well so I guess
> I'll wait for that.

Thanks Dyre! DERBY-3603 fix is now in the 10.4 branch; my tests were
successful so I committed the merged change.

thanks,

bryan

Re: another release candidate?

[Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM>]

Dyre.Tjeldvoll@Sun.COM wrote:
> Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM> writes:
>
>   
>> I have just patched 10.4 to handle DERBY-3616. 
>>     
>
> [snip]
>
>   
>> I recommend cutting a new release
>> candidate for this fix. I would like to spend a day doing some more
>> platform testing of this feature first, though.
>>     
>
> Doesn't seem like anyone is violently opposed to that, so if your
> testing did not uncover anything, I guess another RC would be ok. It
> seems like DERBY-3603 is about to be merged to 10.4 as well so I guess
> I'll wait for that.
>
>   
Thanks, Dyre. My additional testing suggested that DERBY-3545 was a 
duplicate of DERBY-3616.

Regards,
-Rick

Re: another release candidate?

[Dy...@Sun.COM]

Rick Hillegas <Ri...@Sun.COM> writes:

> I have just patched 10.4 to handle DERBY-3616. 

[snip]

> I recommend cutting a new release
> candidate for this fix. I would like to spend a day doing some more
> platform testing of this feature first, though.

Doesn't seem like anyone is violently opposed to that, so if your
testing did not uncover anything, I guess another RC would be ok. It
seems like DERBY-3603 is about to be merged to 10.4 as well so I guess
I'll wait for that.

-- 
dt