You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by Korbinian Bachl <ko...@whiskyworld.de> on 2021/10/10 08:53:03 UTC
jackrabbit without lucene?
Hi,
we are currently using ModeShape as our JCR backend. However, as it was left alone by jboss (it was a jboss project) some time ago we now have the need to focus on some alternatives.
Now I tried to use jackrabbit 2.20 with our app but I have the problem with lucene. Especially its non compatibility with itself. We also use Elasticsearch 7.15 and this also brings lucene with it in its dependencies... so 3.x and 8.x clashes and wont work.
Is there any way I can let out lucene from jackrabbit to have it work? Is there any alternative I have for JCR usage besides removing either jackrabbit or elasticsearch as part of our project?
I've also read about Oak but honestly didnt really understand the implications if it should just behave like a regular JCR2 backend.
Best,
KB
Re: jackrabbit without lucene?
Posted by Korbinian Bachl <ko...@whiskyworld.de>.
Thank you for the hints!
I browsed the jackrabbit webpages mutliple times and I still must admit that I find it not very intuitive to get an overview of whats actually "current" and what not.
Our app is pure JCR based, so OAK should work and I give it a try.
Do you have any resources how to setup oak for a simple multi-workspace setup thats embedded? Some kind of minimum config file for it?
Its basicall very rare write and very very much read from it, so a file based approach or embedded DB like H2 would be what I look for.
Best,
KB
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Torgeir Veimo" <to...@gmail.com>
> An: "users" <us...@jackrabbit.apache.org>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 10. Oktober 2021 11:44:56
> Betreff: Re: jackrabbit without lucene?
> Just to add; I wouldn't move any project onto the old jackrabbit codebase.
>
> And you can use oak without lucene at all, just use the property
> indexes. You simply avoid including the oak-lucene dependencies.
>
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 19:14, Torgeir Veimo <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You can build a modified version of oak with shaded lucene
>> dependencies, so they don't interfere with other lucene dependencies
>> in your project. See the example pom.xml at
>> https://github.com/tveimo/oak-mega-shaded
>>
>> That particular dependency can be tries out with gradle using
>> implementation 'com.github.tveimo:oak-mega-shaded:4ebfa176f1'
>>
>> It doesn't use the latest oak version at the moment, but I will
>> upgrade it shortly.
>>
>> On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 18:53, Korbinian Bachl
>> <ko...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > we are currently using ModeShape as our JCR backend. However, as it was left
>> > alone by jboss (it was a jboss project) some time ago we now have the need to
>> > focus on some alternatives.
>> > Now I tried to use jackrabbit 2.20 with our app but I have the problem with
>> > lucene. Especially its non compatibility with itself. We also use Elasticsearch
>> > 7.15 and this also brings lucene with it in its dependencies... so 3.x and 8.x
>> > clashes and wont work.
>> >
>> > Is there any way I can let out lucene from jackrabbit to have it work? Is there
>> > any alternative I have for JCR usage besides removing either jackrabbit or
>> > elasticsearch as part of our project?
>> >
>> > I've also read about Oak but honestly didnt really understand the implications
>> > if it should just behave like a regular JCR2 backend.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > KB
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -Tor
>
>
>
> --
> -Tor
Re: jackrabbit without lucene?
Posted by Torgeir Veimo <to...@gmail.com>.
Just to add; I wouldn't move any project onto the old jackrabbit codebase.
And you can use oak without lucene at all, just use the property
indexes. You simply avoid including the oak-lucene dependencies.
On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 19:14, Torgeir Veimo <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You can build a modified version of oak with shaded lucene
> dependencies, so they don't interfere with other lucene dependencies
> in your project. See the example pom.xml at
> https://github.com/tveimo/oak-mega-shaded
>
> That particular dependency can be tries out with gradle using
> implementation 'com.github.tveimo:oak-mega-shaded:4ebfa176f1'
>
> It doesn't use the latest oak version at the moment, but I will
> upgrade it shortly.
>
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 18:53, Korbinian Bachl
> <ko...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > we are currently using ModeShape as our JCR backend. However, as it was left alone by jboss (it was a jboss project) some time ago we now have the need to focus on some alternatives.
> > Now I tried to use jackrabbit 2.20 with our app but I have the problem with lucene. Especially its non compatibility with itself. We also use Elasticsearch 7.15 and this also brings lucene with it in its dependencies... so 3.x and 8.x clashes and wont work.
> >
> > Is there any way I can let out lucene from jackrabbit to have it work? Is there any alternative I have for JCR usage besides removing either jackrabbit or elasticsearch as part of our project?
> >
> > I've also read about Oak but honestly didnt really understand the implications if it should just behave like a regular JCR2 backend.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > KB
>
>
>
> --
> -Tor
--
-Tor
Re: jackrabbit without lucene?
Posted by Torgeir Veimo <to...@gmail.com>.
You can build a modified version of oak with shaded lucene
dependencies, so they don't interfere with other lucene dependencies
in your project. See the example pom.xml at
https://github.com/tveimo/oak-mega-shaded
That particular dependency can be tries out with gradle using
implementation 'com.github.tveimo:oak-mega-shaded:4ebfa176f1'
It doesn't use the latest oak version at the moment, but I will
upgrade it shortly.
On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 18:53, Korbinian Bachl
<ko...@whiskyworld.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we are currently using ModeShape as our JCR backend. However, as it was left alone by jboss (it was a jboss project) some time ago we now have the need to focus on some alternatives.
> Now I tried to use jackrabbit 2.20 with our app but I have the problem with lucene. Especially its non compatibility with itself. We also use Elasticsearch 7.15 and this also brings lucene with it in its dependencies... so 3.x and 8.x clashes and wont work.
>
> Is there any way I can let out lucene from jackrabbit to have it work? Is there any alternative I have for JCR usage besides removing either jackrabbit or elasticsearch as part of our project?
>
> I've also read about Oak but honestly didnt really understand the implications if it should just behave like a regular JCR2 backend.
>
> Best,
>
> KB
--
-Tor