You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-user@axis.apache.org by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@gmail.com> on 2005/02/09 10:53:56 UTC
Re: Fw: Gnu Make files
+1 for removing.
Samisa...
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:55:01 +0000, John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> does anyone out there use the -m function (creation of makefiles) on WSDL2Ws
> ? If not then we are thnking of removing it to increase stability.
>
> cheers,
> John.
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded by John Hawkins/UK/IBM on 09/02/2005 09:49 -----
>
> Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@gmail.com>
>
> 09/02/2005 06:19
>
> Please respond to
> "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
>
>
> To Apache AXIS C Developers List <ax...@ws.apache.org>
>
> cc
>
> Subject Re: Gnu Make files
>
>
>
>
>
> Given that we have problems with make file system even with build on
> L/Unix like platforms, I feel that it is not worth having it here.
>
> Could document how to compile and link clients/servers using basic g++
> commands to help users.
>
> Thanks,
> Samisa...
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:18:30 +0000, Andrew Perry2 <PE...@uk.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > There is a test which checks -m option. but it only checks if the
> makefile
> > is generated or not and not the validity of the makefile.
> > These WSDL2WS options tests will be added soon.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andrew Perry
> > IBM Web Services Client for C/C++
> > perryan@uk.ibm.com
> > Mail Point 127
> > IBM UK Laboratories. Hursley Park, Winchester, Hants. SO21 2JN
> > Tel. Internal 249828 External + 44 (0)1962 819828
> > Fax. + 44(0)1962 818080
> >
> > John
> > Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB
> > MGB
> To
> > "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> > 08/02/2005 14:57 <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> >
> cc
> >
> > Please respond to
> Subject
> > "Apache AXIS C Re: Gnu Make files
> > Developers List"
> >
> >
> > It is an option currently on WSDL2Ws ->
> > "-m<none|gnu> generate make files (none|gnu) - default is
> > none\n");
> >
> > Nadir Amra
> > <am...@us.ibm.com>
> >
> To
> > "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> > 08/02/2005 14:44 <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> >
> cc
> >
> > Please respond to
> Subject
> > "Apache AXIS C Re: Gnu Make files
> > Developers List"
> >
> >
> > I prefer not to generate makefiles....but if people want this then it
> > should be on option on the command that you would need to set (i.e. it
> > should not be automatically generated).
> >
> > John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote on 02/08/2005 08:43:00 AM:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Folk,
> > >
> > > I remember a long time ago a small debate about having WSD2Ws
> > > generate Gnu make files? I think this is wierd and I remember some
> > > people objecting previously. However, Do we test this today? If not
> > > then I suggest remove this function on the basis that we're just
> > > making more rope to hang ourselves with?
> > >
> > > I've certainly not seen anyone on the mailng list using this?
> > >
> > > thoughts?
> > >
> > > cheers
> > > John.
> >
> >
>
Re: Fw: Gnu Make files
Posted by Dushshantha Chandaradasa <du...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me too.
Dushshantha...
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:53:56 +0000, Samisa Abeysinghe
<sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for removing.
>
> Samisa...
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:55:01 +0000, John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > does anyone out there use the -m function (creation of makefiles) on WSDL2Ws
> > ? If not then we are thnking of removing it to increase stability.
> >
> > cheers,
> > John.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Forwarded by John Hawkins/UK/IBM on 09/02/2005 09:49 -----
> >
> > Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@gmail.com>
> >
> > 09/02/2005 06:19
> >
> > Please respond to
> > "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> >
> >
> > To Apache AXIS C Developers List <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> >
> > cc
> >
> > Subject Re: Gnu Make files
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Given that we have problems with make file system even with build on
> > L/Unix like platforms, I feel that it is not worth having it here.
> >
> > Could document how to compile and link clients/servers using basic g++
> > commands to help users.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Samisa...
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:18:30 +0000, Andrew Perry2 <PE...@uk.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > > There is a test which checks -m option. but it only checks if the
> > makefile
> > > is generated or not and not the validity of the makefile.
> > > These WSDL2WS options tests will be added soon.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Andrew Perry
> > > IBM Web Services Client for C/C++
> > > perryan@uk.ibm.com
> > > Mail Point 127
> > > IBM UK Laboratories. Hursley Park, Winchester, Hants. SO21 2JN
> > > Tel. Internal 249828 External + 44 (0)1962 819828
> > > Fax. + 44(0)1962 818080
> > >
> > > John
> > > Hawkins/UK/IBM@IB
> > > MGB
> > To
> > > "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> > > 08/02/2005 14:57 <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > >
> > cc
> > >
> > > Please respond to
> > Subject
> > > "Apache AXIS C Re: Gnu Make files
> > > Developers List"
> > >
> > >
> > > It is an option currently on WSDL2Ws ->
> > > "-m<none|gnu> generate make files (none|gnu) - default is
> > > none\n");
> > >
> > > Nadir Amra
> > > <am...@us.ibm.com>
> > >
> > To
> > > "Apache AXIS C Developers List"
> > > 08/02/2005 14:44 <ax...@ws.apache.org>
> > >
> > cc
> > >
> > > Please respond to
> > Subject
> > > "Apache AXIS C Re: Gnu Make files
> > > Developers List"
> > >
> > >
> > > I prefer not to generate makefiles....but if people want this then it
> > > should be on option on the command that you would need to set (i.e. it
> > > should not be automatically generated).
> > >
> > > John Hawkins <HA...@uk.ibm.com> wrote on 02/08/2005 08:43:00 AM:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Folk,
> > > >
> > > > I remember a long time ago a small debate about having WSD2Ws
> > > > generate Gnu make files? I think this is wierd and I remember some
> > > > people objecting previously. However, Do we test this today? If not
> > > > then I suggest remove this function on the basis that we're just
> > > > making more rope to hang ourselves with?
> > > >
> > > > I've certainly not seen anyone on the mailng list using this?
> > > >
> > > > thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > > John.
> > >
> > >
> >
>