You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com> on 2011/12/15 09:15:38 UTC
Keep the trunk in release state for a few days?
L.S.,
Given that it's been a while since we did a release and we already
discovered one issue in the current release build (cfr. SMX4-1010), I would
like to keep the trunk in their releasable state for a few days and e.g.
keep the dependency versions like the NMR version on the release version
(e.g. 1.5.0 in this case) for now. This would be a big time-saver if we
end up recutting (parts of) the release.
The drawback is that, during these few days, trunk can not be built without
adding the staging repos to your local settings.xml (something like
http://pastie.org/3019855) but I think it's worth the extra trouble here.
Wdyt?
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
Re: Keep the trunk in release state for a few days?
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1 of course.
Thanks for the release.
Freeman
On 2011-12-15, at 下午4:15, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> Given that it's been a while since we did a release and we already
> discovered one issue in the current release build (cfr. SMX4-1010),
> I would
> like to keep the trunk in their releasable state for a few days and
> e.g.
> keep the dependency versions like the NMR version on the release
> version
> (e.g. 1.5.0 in this case) for now. This would be a big time-saver
> if we
> end up recutting (parts of) the release.
>
> The drawback is that, during these few days, trunk can not be built
> without
> adding the staging repos to your local settings.xml (something like
> http://pastie.org/3019855) but I think it's worth the extra trouble
> here.
>
>
> Wdyt?
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ffang@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
Re: Keep the trunk in release state for a few days?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1
Regards
JB
On 12/15/2011 09:15 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> Given that it's been a while since we did a release and we already
> discovered one issue in the current release build (cfr. SMX4-1010), I would
> like to keep the trunk in their releasable state for a few days and e.g.
> keep the dependency versions like the NMR version on the release version
> (e.g. 1.5.0 in this case) for now. This would be a big time-saver if we
> end up recutting (parts of) the release.
>
> The drawback is that, during these few days, trunk can not be built without
> adding the staging repos to your local settings.xml (something like
> http://pastie.org/3019855) but I think it's worth the extra trouble here.
>
>
> Wdyt?
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Keep the trunk in release state for a few days?
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
L.S.,
That's good to know - it makes testing/building stuff quite a bit easier
with only one addtional repository to configure...
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Jon Anstey <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh and FYI apparently there is a staging group that combines all staging
> repos... https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Jon Anstey <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good. +1
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Gert Vanthienen <
> > gert.vanthienen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> L.S.,
> >>
> >>
> >> Given that it's been a while since we did a release and we already
> >> discovered one issue in the current release build (cfr. SMX4-1010), I
> >> would
> >> like to keep the trunk in their releasable state for a few days and e.g.
> >> keep the dependency versions like the NMR version on the release version
> >> (e.g. 1.5.0 in this case) for now. This would be a big time-saver if we
> >> end up recutting (parts of) the release.
> >>
> >> The drawback is that, during these few days, trunk can not be built
> >> without
> >> adding the staging repos to your local settings.xml (something like
> >> http://pastie.org/3019855) but I think it's worth the extra trouble
> here.
> >>
> >>
> >> Wdyt?
> >>
> >> Gert Vanthienen
> >> ------------------------
> >> FuseSource
> >> Web: http://fusesource.com
> >> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Jon
> > ---------------
> > FuseSource
> > Email: jon@fusesource.com
> > Web: fusesource.com
> > Twitter: jon_anstey
> > Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
> > Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Jon
> ---------------
> FuseSource
> Email: jon@fusesource.com
> Web: fusesource.com
> Twitter: jon_anstey
> Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
>
Re: Keep the trunk in release state for a few days?
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
Ah, I love this all in one url, thanks for the info Jon.
Freeman
On 2011-12-15, at 下午9:50, Jon Anstey wrote:
> Oh and FYI apparently there is a staging group that combines all
> staging
> repos... https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Jon Anstey <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sounds good. +1
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Gert Vanthienen <
>> gert.vanthienen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> L.S.,
>>>
>>>
>>> Given that it's been a while since we did a release and we already
>>> discovered one issue in the current release build (cfr.
>>> SMX4-1010), I
>>> would
>>> like to keep the trunk in their releasable state for a few days
>>> and e.g.
>>> keep the dependency versions like the NMR version on the release
>>> version
>>> (e.g. 1.5.0 in this case) for now. This would be a big time-saver
>>> if we
>>> end up recutting (parts of) the release.
>>>
>>> The drawback is that, during these few days, trunk can not be built
>>> without
>>> adding the staging repos to your local settings.xml (something like
>>> http://pastie.org/3019855) but I think it's worth the extra
>>> trouble here.
>>>
>>>
>>> Wdyt?
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> FuseSource
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Jon
>> ---------------
>> FuseSource
>> Email: jon@fusesource.com
>> Web: fusesource.com
>> Twitter: jon_anstey
>> Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Jon
> ---------------
> FuseSource
> Email: jon@fusesource.com
> Web: fusesource.com
> Twitter: jon_anstey
> Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ffang@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
Re: Keep the trunk in release state for a few days?
Posted by Jon Anstey <ja...@gmail.com>.
Oh and FYI apparently there is a staging group that combines all staging
repos... https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Jon Anstey <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds good. +1
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Gert Vanthienen <
> gert.vanthienen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> L.S.,
>>
>>
>> Given that it's been a while since we did a release and we already
>> discovered one issue in the current release build (cfr. SMX4-1010), I
>> would
>> like to keep the trunk in their releasable state for a few days and e.g.
>> keep the dependency versions like the NMR version on the release version
>> (e.g. 1.5.0 in this case) for now. This would be a big time-saver if we
>> end up recutting (parts of) the release.
>>
>> The drawback is that, during these few days, trunk can not be built
>> without
>> adding the staging repos to your local settings.xml (something like
>> http://pastie.org/3019855) but I think it's worth the extra trouble here.
>>
>>
>> Wdyt?
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> FuseSource
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Jon
> ---------------
> FuseSource
> Email: jon@fusesource.com
> Web: fusesource.com
> Twitter: jon_anstey
> Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
> Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
>
>
--
Cheers,
Jon
---------------
FuseSource
Email: jon@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: jon_anstey
Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
Re: Keep the trunk in release state for a few days?
Posted by Jon Anstey <ja...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good. +1
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Gert Vanthienen
<ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> Given that it's been a while since we did a release and we already
> discovered one issue in the current release build (cfr. SMX4-1010), I would
> like to keep the trunk in their releasable state for a few days and e.g.
> keep the dependency versions like the NMR version on the release version
> (e.g. 1.5.0 in this case) for now. This would be a big time-saver if we
> end up recutting (parts of) the release.
>
> The drawback is that, during these few days, trunk can not be built without
> adding the staging repos to your local settings.xml (something like
> http://pastie.org/3019855) but I think it's worth the extra trouble here.
>
>
> Wdyt?
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
--
Cheers,
Jon
---------------
FuseSource
Email: jon@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: jon_anstey
Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen
Re: Keep the trunk in release state for a few days?
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1
Anything for the long waiting SMX release out of the door :)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Gert Vanthienen
<ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> Given that it's been a while since we did a release and we already
> discovered one issue in the current release build (cfr. SMX4-1010), I would
> like to keep the trunk in their releasable state for a few days and e.g.
> keep the dependency versions like the NMR version on the release version
> (e.g. 1.5.0 in this case) for now. This would be a big time-saver if we
> end up recutting (parts of) the release.
>
> The drawback is that, during these few days, trunk can not be built without
> adding the staging repos to your local settings.xml (something like
> http://pastie.org/3019855) but I think it's worth the extra trouble here.
>
>
> Wdyt?
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/