ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
time for the release.

Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
abs and relative value.

If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
to use the new api.

Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

I have about 50% of the transition from DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR to
ap_runtime_dir_relative() for various modules ready to commit...

On Mar 12, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
>> Comments? Thoughts?
> 
> sounds good generally
> 
> I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
> more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
> to my trunk patch.
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> 
>>> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
>>> time for the release.
>>> 
>>> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
>>> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
>>> abs and relative value.
>>> 
>>> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
>>> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
>>> to use the new api.
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
> 

Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)

[Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com>]

will do. Just have to turn the test system on again. Guess I can look into
the new gcc 4.6.3 compiler that seems to be "out there" (for AIX then,
might be much newer ones for other platforms) - just need a ton of rpm's to
get it installed....

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If you have something for AIX you want tested, just keep me posted. In
> other
> > words, is it already in trunk?
>
> It is in trunk but needs to be modified before backport.  I'll raise a
> flag once I think I'm done with the fixes, in case you can test again.
>  (Thanks!)
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >> > I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
> >> > Comments? Thoughts?
> >>
> >> sounds good generally
> >>
> >> I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
> >> more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
> >> to my trunk patch.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
> >> >> time for the release.
> >> >>
> >> >> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
> >> >> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
> >> >> abs and relative value.
> >> >>
> >> >> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
> >> >> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
> >> >> to use the new api.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>

Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)

[Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you have something for AIX you want tested, just keep me posted. In other
> words, is it already in trunk?

It is in trunk but needs to be modified before backport.  I'll raise a
flag once I think I'm done with the fixes, in case you can test again.
 (Thanks!)

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> > I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
>> > Comments? Thoughts?
>>
>> sounds good generally
>>
>> I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
>> more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
>> to my trunk patch.
>>
>> >
>> > On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
>> >> time for the release.
>> >>
>> >> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
>> >> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
>> >> abs and relative value.
>> >>
>> >> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
>> >> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
>> >> to use the new api.
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>
>



-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)

[Michael Felt <ma...@gmail.com>]

If you have something for AIX you want tested, just keep me posted. In
other words, is it already in trunk?

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
> > Comments? Thoughts?
>
> sounds good generally
>
> I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
> more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
> to my trunk patch.
>
> >
> > On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
> >> time for the release.
> >>
> >> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
> >> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
> >> abs and relative value.
> >>
> >> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
> >> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
> >> to use the new api.
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>

Re: Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)

[Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
> Comments? Thoughts?

sounds good generally

I hope to help test ap_runtime_dir_relative() and potential exploiters
more and also fix the AIX MPM load issue, which requires some rework
to my trunk patch.

>
> On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
>> time for the release.
>>
>> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
>> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
>> abs and relative value.
>>
>> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
>> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
>> to use the new api.
>>
>



-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Time for 2.4.2 (Was: Re: ap_runtime_dir_relative() and 2.4.2…)

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

I'd like to get 2.4.2 out either this week or next...
Comments? Thoughts?

On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> I'd like to see if we could get ap_runtime_dir_relative() into 2.4 in
> time for the release.
> 
> Right now, trunk includes that func and slotmem utilizes it, and
> trunk passes tests with DefaultRuntimeDir set to both an
> abs and relative value.
> 
> If people can confirm that would be great... I can start the
> transition within the other modules that use DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
> to use the new api.
>