Naming intent DSL

[Aaron Radzinski <ar...@apache.org>]

NLPCraft-ers,
I would like to propose to name our DSL with a dedicated name vs. just a
"intent DSL" or "synonym DSL" as we are doing right now. As this DSL
becomes more sophisticated and more functional it is becoming a central
part of NLPCraft and hence deserves a better "branding". It will also help
to have a shorter, memorable name in conversations when talking about
NLPCraft and how it works.

I'll throw in some of the names that I find suitable to begin but I'll
appreciate the feedback on the idea overall and some name proposals, if you
agree.

Proposed names for Intent DSL:
- "Lingo" language
- "Lingvo" language
- "Craftling" language
- "NLPcraft" language(why not the same name?)
- "Onto" language
- "Chatter" language
- "Tokn" language (play on "token" word)
- "Lesk" language (after Lesk Algorithm)
- "Lexr" language (play on "lexer" word)
- "Textr" language (play on "text" word)
- "IDL" language (Intent Definition Language)
- "Lemma" language

Thoughts, ideas?
--
Aaron Radzinski

Re: Naming intent DSL

[Aaron Radzinski <ar...@datalingvo.com>]

Ok, unless anyone objects we'll go with "NLPCraft IDL" as the name for
Intent/Synonym DSL.

Thank you!
--
Aaron Radzinski



On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:05 AM Nikita Ivanov <ni...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for "NLPCraft IDL"
>
> --
> Nikita Ivanov
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:40 AM Sergey Makov <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 for IDL
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sergey
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:17 AM Kamov Sergey <sk...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I like `NLPCraft IDL` (focus on the same brand +  abbreviation has
> > > sense, it is short)
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Sergey
> > >
> > > On 16.03.2021 01:22, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
> > > > NLPCraft-ers,
> > > > I would like to propose to name our DSL with a dedicated name vs.
> just
> > a
> > > > "intent DSL" or "synonym DSL" as we are doing right now. As this DSL
> > > > becomes more sophisticated and more functional it is becoming a
> central
> > > > part of NLPCraft and hence deserves a better "branding". It will also
> > help
> > > > to have a shorter, memorable name in conversations when talking about
> > > > NLPCraft and how it works.
> > > >
> > > > I'll throw in some of the names that I find suitable to begin but
> I'll
> > > > appreciate the feedback on the idea overall and some name proposals,
> > if you
> > > > agree.
> > > >
> > > > Proposed names for Intent DSL:
> > > > - "Lingo" language
> > > > - "Lingvo" language
> > > > - "Craftling" language
> > > > - "NLPcraft" language(why not the same name?)
> > > > - "Onto" language
> > > > - "Chatter" language
> > > > - "Tokn" language (play on "token" word)
> > > > - "Lesk" language (after Lesk Algorithm)
> > > > - "Lexr" language (play on "lexer" word)
> > > > - "Textr" language (play on "text" word)
> > > > - "IDL" language (Intent Definition Language)
> > > > - "Lemma" language
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts, ideas?
> > > > --
> > > > Aaron Radzinski
> > > >
> >
>

Re: Naming intent DSL

[Nikita Ivanov <ni...@gmail.com>]

+1 for "NLPCraft IDL"

--
Nikita Ivanov



On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 10:40 AM Sergey Makov <sm...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for IDL
>
> Regards,
> Sergey
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:17 AM Kamov Sergey <sk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I like `NLPCraft IDL` (focus on the same brand +  abbreviation has
> > sense, it is short)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sergey
> >
> > On 16.03.2021 01:22, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
> > > NLPCraft-ers,
> > > I would like to propose to name our DSL with a dedicated name vs. just
> a
> > > "intent DSL" or "synonym DSL" as we are doing right now. As this DSL
> > > becomes more sophisticated and more functional it is becoming a central
> > > part of NLPCraft and hence deserves a better "branding". It will also
> help
> > > to have a shorter, memorable name in conversations when talking about
> > > NLPCraft and how it works.
> > >
> > > I'll throw in some of the names that I find suitable to begin but I'll
> > > appreciate the feedback on the idea overall and some name proposals,
> if you
> > > agree.
> > >
> > > Proposed names for Intent DSL:
> > > - "Lingo" language
> > > - "Lingvo" language
> > > - "Craftling" language
> > > - "NLPcraft" language(why not the same name?)
> > > - "Onto" language
> > > - "Chatter" language
> > > - "Tokn" language (play on "token" word)
> > > - "Lesk" language (after Lesk Algorithm)
> > > - "Lexr" language (play on "lexer" word)
> > > - "Textr" language (play on "text" word)
> > > - "IDL" language (Intent Definition Language)
> > > - "Lemma" language
> > >
> > > Thoughts, ideas?
> > > --
> > > Aaron Radzinski
> > >
>

Re: Naming intent DSL

[Sergey Makov <sm...@apache.org>]

+1 for IDL

Regards,
Sergey

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:17 AM Kamov Sergey <sk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I like `NLPCraft IDL` (focus on the same brand +  abbreviation has
> sense, it is short)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sergey
>
> On 16.03.2021 01:22, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
> > NLPCraft-ers,
> > I would like to propose to name our DSL with a dedicated name vs. just a
> > "intent DSL" or "synonym DSL" as we are doing right now. As this DSL
> > becomes more sophisticated and more functional it is becoming a central
> > part of NLPCraft and hence deserves a better "branding". It will also help
> > to have a shorter, memorable name in conversations when talking about
> > NLPCraft and how it works.
> >
> > I'll throw in some of the names that I find suitable to begin but I'll
> > appreciate the feedback on the idea overall and some name proposals, if you
> > agree.
> >
> > Proposed names for Intent DSL:
> > - "Lingo" language
> > - "Lingvo" language
> > - "Craftling" language
> > - "NLPcraft" language(why not the same name?)
> > - "Onto" language
> > - "Chatter" language
> > - "Tokn" language (play on "token" word)
> > - "Lesk" language (after Lesk Algorithm)
> > - "Lexr" language (play on "lexer" word)
> > - "Textr" language (play on "text" word)
> > - "IDL" language (Intent Definition Language)
> > - "Lemma" language
> >
> > Thoughts, ideas?
> > --
> > Aaron Radzinski
> >

Re: Naming intent DSL

[Kamov Sergey <sk...@gmail.com>]

I like `NLPCraft IDL` (focus on the same brand +  abbreviation has 
sense, it is short)


Regards,

Sergey

On 16.03.2021 01:22, Aaron Radzinski wrote:
> NLPCraft-ers,
> I would like to propose to name our DSL with a dedicated name vs. just a
> "intent DSL" or "synonym DSL" as we are doing right now. As this DSL
> becomes more sophisticated and more functional it is becoming a central
> part of NLPCraft and hence deserves a better "branding". It will also help
> to have a shorter, memorable name in conversations when talking about
> NLPCraft and how it works.
>
> I'll throw in some of the names that I find suitable to begin but I'll
> appreciate the feedback on the idea overall and some name proposals, if you
> agree.
>
> Proposed names for Intent DSL:
> - "Lingo" language
> - "Lingvo" language
> - "Craftling" language
> - "NLPcraft" language(why not the same name?)
> - "Onto" language
> - "Chatter" language
> - "Tokn" language (play on "token" word)
> - "Lesk" language (after Lesk Algorithm)
> - "Lexr" language (play on "lexer" word)
> - "Textr" language (play on "text" word)
> - "IDL" language (Intent Definition Language)
> - "Lemma" language
>
> Thoughts, ideas?
> --
> Aaron Radzinski
>