You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@roller.apache.org by Dave Johnson <da...@rollerweblogger.org> on 2005/06/20 16:13:40 UTC
Roller 1.2 tagged
I just created these tags on Roller's CVS HEAD:
ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE
ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH
I also deployed the latest code to my personal site and an internal
staging site for final testing.
Before I cut the final release, I'd like to move to Subversion. Are we
ready for that?
- Dave
Re: [Roller-development] Re: Roller 1.2 tagged
Posted by Allen Gilliland <Al...@Sun.COM>.
Here's the config migration guide ... http://www.rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ConfigMigration
I think I've hit all the important config elements, so as long as people actually read it and follow the instructions then it should be fine. We'll need to make sure the upgrade docs tell people that the config migration is a *must do*.
-- Allen
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 10:43, Allen Gilliland wrote:
> I've just run through the upgrade process for 1.1 to 1.2 a couple times and everything looks good to me ...
>
> INFO 2005-06-20 10:29:07,312 PropertiesManagerImpl:migrateOldRollerConfig - Found old roller config ... doing migration to new runtime properties.
> INFO 2005-06-20 10:29:07,383 PropertiesManagerImpl:initializeMissingProps - Found uninitialized property pings.suspendPingProcessing ... setting value to [false]
>
> Probably the most difficult part of the migration will be the process of getting people to setup their roller-custom.properties files and manually migrate a few db properties into that file. I am working on a migration guide right now and I'll send it out for review as soon as I'm done with it.
>
> I did notice one gotcha when I did my upgrade which was that password encryption is currently disabled by default, however in 1.1 the roller-config.xml has it enabled by default. I am thinking we should probably have the password encryption enabled by default, so I'll putback that 1 change to roller.properties and then we'll need to re-tag. Sorry about that Dave.
>
> -- Allen
>
>
> On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 09:47, Allen Gilliland wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 08:02, Anil Gangolli wrote:
> > >
> > > Regarding the config upgrade path, I tested it a while ago for my own site
> > > and did run into some minor issues that I fixed in the config code, and then
> > > I think Allen rewrote those portions pretty fundamentally, so that's
> > > something we should make sure has been retested.
> > >
> >
> > i'll spend some extra time testing this today, but everything was working fine the last time i made changes. we've been running most of the config code on BSC for about a month now with no problems and the only changes i've made since then is the new code that parses the xml config defs file and inits new db properties.
> >
> > -- Allen
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Dave Johnson" <da...@rollerweblogger.org>
> > > To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
> > > Cc: <ro...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 7:13 AM
> > > Subject: Roller 1.2 tagged
> > >
> > >
> > > >I just created these tags on Roller's CVS HEAD:
> > > >
> > > > ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE
> > > > ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH
> > > >
> > > > I also deployed the latest code to my personal site and an internal
> > > > staging site for final testing.
> > > >
> > > > Before I cut the final release, I'd like to move to Subversion. Are we
> > > > ready for that?
> > > >
> > > > - Dave
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> > from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> > informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> > speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Roller-development mailing list
> > Roller-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roller-development
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Roller-development mailing list
> Roller-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roller-development
Re: [Roller-development] Re: Roller 1.2 tagged
Posted by Allen Gilliland <Al...@Sun.COM>.
I've just run through the upgrade process for 1.1 to 1.2 a couple times and everything looks good to me ...
INFO 2005-06-20 10:29:07,312 PropertiesManagerImpl:migrateOldRollerConfig - Found old roller config ... doing migration to new runtime properties.
INFO 2005-06-20 10:29:07,383 PropertiesManagerImpl:initializeMissingProps - Found uninitialized property pings.suspendPingProcessing ... setting value to [false]
Probably the most difficult part of the migration will be the process of getting people to setup their roller-custom.properties files and manually migrate a few db properties into that file. I am working on a migration guide right now and I'll send it out for review as soon as I'm done with it.
I did notice one gotcha when I did my upgrade which was that password encryption is currently disabled by default, however in 1.1 the roller-config.xml has it enabled by default. I am thinking we should probably have the password encryption enabled by default, so I'll putback that 1 change to roller.properties and then we'll need to re-tag. Sorry about that Dave.
-- Allen
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 09:47, Allen Gilliland wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 08:02, Anil Gangolli wrote:
> >
> > Regarding the config upgrade path, I tested it a while ago for my own site
> > and did run into some minor issues that I fixed in the config code, and then
> > I think Allen rewrote those portions pretty fundamentally, so that's
> > something we should make sure has been retested.
> >
>
> i'll spend some extra time testing this today, but everything was working fine the last time i made changes. we've been running most of the config code on BSC for about a month now with no problems and the only changes i've made since then is the new code that parses the xml config defs file and inits new db properties.
>
> -- Allen
>
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Johnson" <da...@rollerweblogger.org>
> > To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
> > Cc: <ro...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 7:13 AM
> > Subject: Roller 1.2 tagged
> >
> >
> > >I just created these tags on Roller's CVS HEAD:
> > >
> > > ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE
> > > ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH
> > >
> > > I also deployed the latest code to my personal site and an internal
> > > staging site for final testing.
> > >
> > > Before I cut the final release, I'd like to move to Subversion. Are we
> > > ready for that?
> > >
> > > - Dave
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Roller-development mailing list
> Roller-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roller-development
Re: Roller 1.2 tagged
Posted by Allen Gilliland <Al...@Sun.COM>.
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 08:02, Anil Gangolli wrote:
>
> Regarding the config upgrade path, I tested it a while ago for my own site
> and did run into some minor issues that I fixed in the config code, and then
> I think Allen rewrote those portions pretty fundamentally, so that's
> something we should make sure has been retested.
>
i'll spend some extra time testing this today, but everything was working fine the last time i made changes. we've been running most of the config code on BSC for about a month now with no problems and the only changes i've made since then is the new code that parses the xml config defs file and inits new db properties.
-- Allen
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave Johnson" <da...@rollerweblogger.org>
> To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
> Cc: <ro...@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 7:13 AM
> Subject: Roller 1.2 tagged
>
>
> >I just created these tags on Roller's CVS HEAD:
> >
> > ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE
> > ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH
> >
> > I also deployed the latest code to my personal site and an internal
> > staging site for final testing.
> >
> > Before I cut the final release, I'd like to move to Subversion. Are we
> > ready for that?
> >
> > - Dave
> >
>
Re: Roller 1.2 tagged
Posted by Anil Gangolli <an...@busybuddha.org>.
I'm ready to move to Subversion, but I have some questions regarding the
release.
I think the two riskiest elements of the release are the new ping code and
the new config code (and the upgrade installation path on that). Do we feel
these have been adequately tested at this point?
I'm reasonably confident in the ping functionality, but was hoping others
had established some independent confidence (which would boost mine as
well). (I did provide a test plan in rough outline, and there was some
discussion earlier that suggested this might be applied at Sun, but I
haven't heard anything.) Also, I am hoping the code has been reviewed by
now.
Regarding the config upgrade path, I tested it a while ago for my own site
and did run into some minor issues that I fixed in the config code, and then
I think Allen rewrote those portions pretty fundamentally, so that's
something we should make sure has been retested.
Contingent on this stuff, I'm ready to release as well.
--a.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Johnson" <da...@rollerweblogger.org>
To: <ro...@incubator.apache.org>
Cc: <ro...@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 7:13 AM
Subject: Roller 1.2 tagged
>I just created these tags on Roller's CVS HEAD:
>
> ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE
> ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH
>
> I also deployed the latest code to my personal site and an internal
> staging site for final testing.
>
> Before I cut the final release, I'd like to move to Subversion. Are we
> ready for that?
>
> - Dave
>
Re: [Roller-development] Re: Roller 1.2 tagged
Posted by Allen Gilliland <Al...@Sun.COM>.
i agree. we can wait another day or two to make sure the release really is final.
-- Allen
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 08:06, Matt Raible wrote:
> In my experience with AppFuse, I've sometimes found minor issues in
> the release - and had to re-tag and re-release a day or two after the
> initial release. I'd advocate releasing from java.net, waiting a day
> or two to confirm that the release is solid, and then moving to
> subversion.
>
> Matt
>
> On 6/20/05, Dave Johnson <da...@rollerweblogger.org> wrote:
> > I just created these tags on Roller's CVS HEAD:
> >
> > ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE
> > ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH
> >
> > I also deployed the latest code to my personal site and an internal
> > staging site for final testing.
> >
> > Before I cut the final release, I'd like to move to Subversion. Are we
> > ready for that?
> >
> > - Dave
> >
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&opclick
> _______________________________________________
> Roller-development mailing list
> Roller-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/roller-development
Re: Roller 1.2 tagged
Posted by Matt Raible <mr...@gmail.com>.
In my experience with AppFuse, I've sometimes found minor issues in
the release - and had to re-tag and re-release a day or two after the
initial release. I'd advocate releasing from java.net, waiting a day
or two to confirm that the release is solid, and then moving to
subversion.
Matt
On 6/20/05, Dave Johnson <da...@rollerweblogger.org> wrote:
> I just created these tags on Roller's CVS HEAD:
>
> ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE
> ROLLER_1_2_RELEASE_BRANCH
>
> I also deployed the latest code to my personal site and an internal
> staging site for final testing.
>
> Before I cut the final release, I'd like to move to Subversion. Are we
> ready for that?
>
> - Dave
>
>