You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ws.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/18 17:15:22 UTC
A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for XmlSchema
Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's possible
to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier of
could create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs doing
in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
Objections
RE: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for
XmlSchema
Posted by Tom Jordahl <tj...@adobe.com>.
+1
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 11:15 AM
To: general@ws.apache.org
Subject: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for XmlSchema
Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's possible
to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier of
could create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs doing
in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
Objections
Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for
XmlSchema
Posted by Nadir Amra <am...@us.ibm.com>.
+1
Nadir Amra
Integrated Web Services for IBM i Operating System
Internet: amra@us.ibm.com
Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote on 10/18/2010 01:18:56 PM:
> From: Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> To: general@ws.apache.org
> Date: 10/18/2010 01:20 PM
> Subject: Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture
> moving for XmlSchema
>
> +1 from me!
>
> On 10/18/2010 2:01 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > svn mv. no loss of history.
> >
> > On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/18/2010 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> >>> Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's
possible
> >>> to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
> >>> up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier
of
> >>> could create a
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
> >>> and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs
doing
> >>> in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
> >>
> >> Are you talking about pushing just the content and therefore losing
the SVN
> >> history trail, or doing a move that retains the logs?
> >>
> >> --G
Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for
XmlSchema
Posted by Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>.
+1 from me!
On 10/18/2010 2:01 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> svn mv. no loss of history.
>
> On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/18/2010 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's possible
>>> to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
>>> up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier of
>>> could create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
>>> and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs doing
>>> in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
>>
>> Are you talking about pushing just the content and therefore losing the SVN
>> history trail, or doing a move that retains the logs?
>>
>> --G
Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for XmlSchema
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
svn mv. no loss of history.
On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/2010 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's possible
>> to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
>> up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier of
>> could create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
>> and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs doing
>> in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
>
> Are you talking about pushing just the content and therefore losing the SVN
> history trail, or doing a move that retains the logs?
>
> --G
Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for
XmlSchema
Posted by Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>.
On 10/18/2010 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's possible
> to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
> up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier of
> could create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
> and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs doing
> in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
Are you talking about pushing just the content and therefore losing the SVN
history trail, or doing a move that retains the logs?
--G