You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@cassandra.apache.org by DE VITO Dominique <do...@thalesgroup.com> on 2016/03/04 17:39:38 UTC
Cassandra runing on top of NAS (RAIN storage) !?? anyone ?
Hi,
Is there any info about running C* on top of a NAS storage, well, a RAIN storage (to be precise) in fact ?
I expect C* to run on top of a RAIN like on top of a high-end SAN: that is, with a drop (-50%) in performance.
Any return available ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Dominique
RE: Cassandra runing on top of NAS (RAIN storage) !?? anyone ?
Posted by DE VITO Dominique <do...@thalesgroup.com>.
> Don't do it [C* on NAS storage]
Yes, I know ;-) it’s an anti-pattern.
Let’s me give more info.
We expect moving from a high-end SAN (<= yes, I know !) to local hard drives.
Due to lack time (I won’t dig into it here), we expect in fact moving like this: SAN => RAIN => local HDD (for storage)
So, the questions:
- for C* storage point of view, is RAIN performance similar to a SAN ?
- or, is C* on RAIN much, much worse than C* on SAN ?
Any return/experience will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Dominique
De : Jonathan Haddad [mailto:jon@jonhaddad.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 4 mars 2016 17:56
À : user@cassandra.apache.org
Objet : Re: Cassandra runing on top of NAS (RAIN storage) !?? anyone ?
Don't do it
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:39 AM DE VITO Dominique <do...@thalesgroup.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Is there any info about running C* on top of a NAS storage, well, a RAIN storage (to be precise) in fact ?
I expect C* to run on top of a RAIN like on top of a high-end SAN: that is, with a drop (-50%) in performance.
Any return available ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Dominique
Re: Cassandra runing on top of NAS (RAIN storage) !?? anyone ?
Posted by Jonathan Haddad <jo...@jonhaddad.com>.
Don't do it
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:39 AM DE VITO Dominique <
dominique.devito@thalesgroup.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any info about running C* on top of a NAS storage, well, a RAIN
> storage (to be precise) in fact ?
>
> I expect C* to run on top of a RAIN like on top of a high-end SAN: that
> is, with a drop (-50%) in performance.
>
> Any return available ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Dominique
>
>