You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> on 2016/05/24 04:13:02 UTC

[VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)

The artifacts can be downloaded from:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf

You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:

python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf

Here’s my +1.

Docs, changes and javadocs look good.

SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 15:12 Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> ha
scritto:

> Hi Tommaso,
>
> You and Anshum are getting that warning because you don’t trust me - or
> rather: neither you nor anybody you trust has signed my code signing key.
>
> Yesterday Anshum and I signed each other’s code signing keys and uploaded
> them, and I’m willing to do that with others.
>

thanks Steve for the clarification, I do trust you of course :) will fix
that on my side too.

Regards,
Tommaso


>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
> > On May 25, 2016, at 4:26 AM, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce
> David's issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can
> reproduce it let's go ahead with the release.
> >
> > +1 on my side.
> > SUCCESS! [1:19:14.997834]
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tommaso
> >
> > Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 06:48 David Smiley <
> david.w.smiley@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed
> right after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What
> might the problem be?
> >
> >   unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
> >     verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in <module>
> >     main()
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
> >     smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
> >     unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, baseURL)
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in
> unpackAndVerify
> >     verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in
> verifyUnpacked
> >     checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir,
> baseURL)
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
> >     checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision,
> version)
> >   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in
> checkJARMetaData
> >     (desc, verify))
> > RuntimeError: JAR file
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> >
> > Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a
> new project and haven't found issues yet.
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think
> you should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
> >
> > I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key
> is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >
> > Here's my +1!
> >
> > SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
> >
> > Mike McCandless
> >
> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
> >
> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> >
> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >
> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> >
> > Here’s my +1.
> >
> > Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
> >
> > SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Anshum Gupta
> > --
> > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Tommaso,

You and Anshum are getting that warning because you don’t trust me - or rather: neither you nor anybody you trust has signed my code signing key.

Yesterday Anshum and I signed each other’s code signing keys and uploaded them, and I’m willing to do that with others.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 25, 2016, at 4:26 AM, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce David's issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can reproduce it let's go ahead with the release.
> 
> +1 on my side.
> SUCCESS! [1:19:14.997834]
> 
> Regards,
> Tommaso
> 
> Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 06:48 David Smiley <da...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might the problem be?
> 
>   unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
>     verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in <module>
>     main()
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
>     smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir, c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
>     unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision, version, testArgs, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in unpackAndVerify
>     verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision, version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
>     checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
>     checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision, version)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in checkJARMetaData
>     (desc, verify))
> RuntimeError: JAR file "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar" is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> 
> Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new project and haven't found issues yet.
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
> Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
> 
> I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> 
> Here's my +1! 
> 
> SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> +1
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
> 
> Mike McCandless
> 
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
> 
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> 
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> 
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> 
> Here’s my +1.
> 
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Anshum Gupta
> -- 
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Ahmet Arslan <io...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.

+1
SUCCESS! [1:00:26.085469]


On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:27 AM, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:



got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce David's issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can reproduce it let's go ahead with the release.

+1 on my side.

SUCCESS! [1:19:14.997834]
Regards,
Tommaso

Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 06:48 David Smiley <da...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might the problem be?
>
>
>  unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
>    verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
>Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in <module>
>    main()
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
>    smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir, c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
>    unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision, version, testArgs, baseURL)
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in unpackAndVerify
>    verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision, version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
>    checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir, baseURL)
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
>    checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision, version)
>  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in checkJARMetaData
>    (desc, verify))
>RuntimeError: JAR file "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar" is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
>
>Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new project and haven't found issues yet.
>
>On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>
>Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
>>
>>
>>
>>I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>>
>>
>>Here's my +1! 
>>
>>
>>SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>+1
>>>
>>>
>>>SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Mike McCandless
>>>
>>>http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>>
>>>On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>>>
>>>>The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>>You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>>python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>>Here’s my +1.
>>>>
>>>>Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>>>
>>>>SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Steve
>>>>www.lucidworks.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>
>>Anshum Gupta
>-- 
>
>Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
>LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
got the same warning on the GPG key signature but could not reproduce
David's issue, not sure what it could be though. I'd say if no one else can
reproduce it let's go ahead with the release.

+1 on my side.

SUCCESS! [1:19:14.997834]
Regards,
Tommaso

Il giorno mer 25 mag 2016 alle ore 06:48 David Smiley <
david.w.smiley@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right
> after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might
> the problem be?
>
>   unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
>     verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in <module>
>     main()
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
>     smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
>     unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in
> unpackAndVerify
>     verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
>     checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir,
> baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
>     checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision,
> version)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in
> checkJARMetaData
>     (desc, verify))
> RuntimeError: JAR file
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
> Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new
> project and haven't found issues yet.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you
>> should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
>>
>> I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key
>> is not certified with a trusted signature!
>>
>> Here's my +1!
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
>>>> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
>>>> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> Here’s my +1.
>>>>
>>>> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve
>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Adrien Grand <jp...@gmail.com>.
+1 SUCCESS! [0:55:13.784752]

Le jeu. 26 mai 2016 à 08:49, Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com>
a écrit :

> +1
> SUCCESS! [1:13:52.067157]
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Michael McCandless <
> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Steve.
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> > On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.
>>> I thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <
>>> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> David did you use master's smoke tester?
>>> >>
>>> >> You must use the version on 6.0.x.
>>> >
>>> > I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the
>>> appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.
>>>
>>> I committed a fix: the smoke tester will now fail when run against an
>>> incompatible release, i.e. one with a different major.minor version.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Tomás Fernández Löbbe <to...@gmail.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [1:13:52.067157]

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Michael McCandless <
lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> Thanks Steve.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.
>> I thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> David did you use master's smoke tester?
>> >>
>> >> You must use the version on 6.0.x.
>> >
>> > I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the
>> appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.
>>
>> I committed a fix: the smoke tester will now fail when run against an
>> incompatible release, i.e. one with a different major.minor version.
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Thanks Steve.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.  I
> thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.
> >
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <
> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> David did you use master's smoke tester?
> >>
> >> You must use the version on 6.0.x.
> >
> > I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the
> appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.
>
> I committed a fix: the smoke tester will now fail when run against an
> incompatible release, i.e. one with a different major.minor version.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
> On May 25, 2016, at 11:27 AM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.  I thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.
> 
> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>> 
>> David did you use master's smoke tester?
>> 
>> You must use the version on 6.0.x.
> 
> I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.

I committed a fix: the smoke tester will now fail when run against an incompatible release, i.e. one with a different major.minor version.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>.
+1

SUCCESS! [0:49:14.757238]

The problem I had was that I was on branch_6x not the release branch.  I
thought it'd be good enough but apparently not.

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> I think this is a result of the JDK naming stuff that Uwe has been working
> on (e.g. 1.8->8) to enable JDK9 usage - but AFAIK that’s not on branch_6_0:
>
> > On May 25, 2016, at 12:48 AM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > RuntimeError: JAR file
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
> So I think Mike’s right:
>
> > On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <
> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> >
> > David did you use master's smoke tester?
> >
> > You must use the version on 6.0.x.
>
> I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the
> appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
> --
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi David, 

I think this is a result of the JDK naming stuff that Uwe has been working on (e.g. 1.8->8) to enable JDK9 usage - but AFAIK that’s not on branch_6_0:

> On May 25, 2016, at 12:48 AM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
> RuntimeError: JAR file "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar" is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF

So I think Mike’s right:
 
> On May 25, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> 
> David did you use master's smoke tester?
> 
> You must use the version on 6.0.x.

I think it should be possible to verify that users are running the appropriate version of the smoke tester - I’ll take a look.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
David did you use master's smoke tester?

You must use the version on 6.0.x.

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:48 AM, David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right
> after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might
> the problem be?
>
>   unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
>     verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in <module>
>     main()
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
>     smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir,
> c.is_signed, ' '.join(c.test_args))
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
>     unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in
> unpackAndVerify
>     verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision,
> version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
>     checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir,
> baseURL)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
>     checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision,
> version)
>   File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in
> checkJARMetaData
>     (desc, verify))
> RuntimeError: JAR file
> "/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
> is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>
> Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new
> project and haven't found issues yet.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you
>> should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
>>
>> I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key
>> is not certified with a trusted signature!
>>
>> Here's my +1!
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
>>>> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
>>>> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>>
>>>> Here’s my +1.
>>>>
>>>> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve
>>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>>
> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by David Smiley <da...@gmail.com>.
I tried to run the smoke tester directly on my machine and it failed right
after unpacking.  Given other's success, it must be user error.  What might
the problem be?

  unpack lucene-6.0.1.tgz...
    verify JAR metadata/identity/no javax.* or java.* classes...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1412, in <module>
    main()
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1356, in main
    smokeTest(c.java, c.url, c.revision, c.version, c.tmp_dir, c.is_signed,
' '.join(c.test_args))
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 1393, in smokeTest
    unpackAndVerify(java, 'lucene', tmpDir, artifact, gitRevision, version,
testArgs, baseURL)
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 590, in unpackAndVerify
    verifyUnpacked(java, project, artifact, unpackPath, gitRevision,
version, testArgs, tmpDir, baseURL)
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 712, in verifyUnpacked
    checkAllJARs(os.getcwd(), project, gitRevision, version, tmpDir,
baseURL)
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 270, in checkAllJARs
    checkJARMetaData('JAR file "%s"' % fullPath, fullPath, gitRevision,
version)
  File "dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py", line 202, in
checkJARMetaData
    (desc, verify))
RuntimeError: JAR file
"/private/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.0.1_c7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf/unpack/lucene-6.0.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-6.0.1.jar"
is missing "X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF

Separately from the smoketest, I've downloaded this RC to use it on a new
project and haven't found issues yet.

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:19 PM Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:

> Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you
> should get someone to sign you GPG key :)
>
> I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is
> not certified with a trusted signature!
>
> Here's my +1!
>
> SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
>>> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
>>> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>>
>>> Here’s my +1.
>>>
>>> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve
>>> www.lucidworks.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>
-- 
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Anshum Gupta <an...@anshumgupta.net>.
Thanks for doing the release, Steve. All looks good to me but I think you
should get someone to sign you GPG key :)

I see this warning while running the tests: GPG: gpg: WARNING: This key is
not certified with a trusted signature!

Here's my +1!

SUCCESS! [1:05:50.755245]



On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael McCandless <
lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
>> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
>> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>>
>> Here’s my +1.
>>
>> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>>
>> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>>
>> --
>> Steve
>> www.lucidworks.com
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>


-- 
Anshum Gupta

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
+1

SUCCESS! [0:31:57.451386]

Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> Here’s my +1.
>
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com>.
+1

-Yonik

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> Here’s my +1.
>
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
This vote has passed.  Thanks to all who voted!

I’ll start publishing stuff now.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On May 27, 2016, at 3:02 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> SUCCESS! [1:10:04.644047]
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
> 
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> 
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> 
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
> 
> Here’s my +1.
> 
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
> 
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
> 
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.0.1 RC2

Posted by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1

SUCCESS! [1:10:04.644047]

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.0.1.  (I found a
> couple problems in CHANGES after I committed RC1 to Subversion, so I didn’t
> call the vote, and cut RC2 instead.)
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.1-RC2-revc7510a0fdd93329ec04c853c8557f4a3f2309eaf
>
> Here’s my +1.
>
> Docs, changes and javadocs look good.
>
> SUCCESS! [0:26:34.596490]
>
> --
> Steve
> www.lucidworks.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.