You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ozone.apache.org by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID> on 2024/08/22 22:30:05 UTC
[DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Hi,
I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0 instead.
Reason being:
(1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
(2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity and
functionalities have changed so much.
(3) The HBase support is a significant change.
(4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly enhanced it
in the coming release.
(5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
(6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very different now.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> wrote:
> Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release 2.10.2 was
> two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at all.
> Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to maintain.
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi community,
>>
>> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There have
>> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130 commits
>> <https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master> added to
>> the git history.
>>
>> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor release.
>> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of 1.5.0 at this
>> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
>>
>> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
>> * HBase support HDDS-7593
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
>> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
>> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
>>
>> Improvements
>> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153>
>> * CVE updates
>>
>> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me even more
>> excited!
>>
>> Best,
>> Weichiu
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>.
I'm sorry I missed your comment.
I think we are community-based and we'd like our community to adopt Ozone.
If Hadoop2 is still being used by the community then we may have to support
it.
Maybe we can advertise it as "deprecated" and remove it the next major
release (hopefully not in another 4 years)
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 4:32 AM wanghongbing <wh...@foxmail.com>
wrote:
>
> +1 for Ozone 2.0.
>
> I would like to learn more about the following:
>
> > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
>
> This may require users who are using the Hadoop2 client to do additional
> work to be compatible with ozone. We are currently using Hadoop client
> version 2.7.
> Is it possible to find a friendly solution to Hadoop2 ?
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 23, 2024, at 06:30, Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0 instead.
> >
> > Reason being:
> > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity and
> > functionalities have changed so much.
> > (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> > (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly enhanced
> it
> > in the coming release.
> > (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> > (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very different now.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> >> What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release 2.10.2 was
> >> two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at all.
> >> Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to maintain.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi community,
> >>>
> >>> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There have
> >>> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130 commits
> >>> <https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master> added
> to
> >>> the git history.
> >>>
> >>> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor release.
> >>> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of 1.5.0 at this
> >>> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
> >>>
> >>> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
> >>> * HBase support HDDS-7593
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
> >>> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
> >>> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
> >>>
> >>> Improvements
> >>> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153>
> >>> * CVE updates
> >>>
> >>> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me even more
> >>> excited!
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Weichiu
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by wanghongbing <wh...@foxmail.com>.
+1 for Ozone 2.0.
I would like to learn more about the following:
> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
This may require users who are using the Hadoop2 client to do additional work to be compatible with ozone. We are currently using Hadoop client version 2.7.
Is it possible to find a friendly solution to Hadoop2 ?
> On Aug 23, 2024, at 06:30, Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0 instead.
>
> Reason being:
> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity and
> functionalities have changed so much.
> (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly enhanced it
> in the coming release.
> (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very different now.
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Oh actually I forgot to mention:
>> What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release 2.10.2 was
>> two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at all.
>> Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to maintain.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi community,
>>>
>>> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There have
>>> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130 commits
>>> <https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master> added to
>>> the git history.
>>>
>>> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor release.
>>> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of 1.5.0 at this
>>> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
>>>
>>> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
>>> * HBase support HDDS-7593
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
>>> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
>>> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
>>>
>>> Improvements
>>> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153>
>>> * CVE updates
>>>
>>> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me even more
>>> excited!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Weichiu
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the feedback!
I've captured the comments and also reviewed recent feature developments in
the JIRA, and took a stab at a release plan:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-OLE3IUKZH4zVsPVlUxwNho7MVuoBUwbAgbLMPzouMc/edit?usp=sharing
Let's say
Timeline:
-
End of August: Draft release plan
-
Mid-September: Scope freeze
-
September 30: Code freeze and branching
-
October 7-10: Release Candidate 0 (coinciding with Community Over Code
NA)
-
October 31: Release Candidate 1
-
November 22: General Availability (before Thanksgiving week)
The payload of the release is documented at the scope doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19QG0fJb5YqvkezUnzV0cJH9VuI8lw4GYfTOyrGpk-Fg/edit?usp=sharing
In the newer release, we will be adding the following features or
improvements
-
HBase support
-
Recon UI revamp
-
Website v2
-
JDK17 support
-
Snapshot improvement
And deprecate or dropping the following features
-
Drop/deprecate Hadoop2 support
-
Deprecate legacy bucket type
-
Remove STAND_ALONE replication type HDDS-6218
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6218>
-
Proto2 to Proto3 migration
-
Deprecate o3fs
-
Reject creating new LEGACY buckets
* Helm chart HDDS-11027 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11027>
is a new feature coming out soon but is not part of the main Ozone binary.
Thoughts? Please feel free to comment/edit on the release plan and scope
doc.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 10:29 AM Ethan Rose <er...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for driving this Wei-Chiu, I'm +1 for deprecating legacy
> buckets and o3fs as well. The release plan will need to specify how these
> deprecations are implemented and what the impacts will be. For example,
> legacy buckets will likely remain readable and writable but creation of new
> ones will be blocked. This will have impacts on clients older than version
> 1.2.0.
>
> Other ideas to consider for a major release:
>
> - Removing STAND_ALONE replication type (it should be the same as RATIS
> 1): HDDS-6218 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6218>
> - CLI cleanup such that all subcommands and flags use kebab-case and
> double dash for long options.
> - This is a more involved project that we might not have time for.
> Ideally all current non-compliant commands would still work but
> remain
> hidden in help messages.
> - We would need an enforcement plan going forward to make sure new
> CLI options remain consistent. CI can get us part of the way
> there but some
> sort of manual guideline document would also need to be drafted and
> enforced by reviewers.
>
> Regarding proto2 to proto3 migration, Pifta had some ideas in the last
> community sync that this may not actually be too complicated and we could
> maintain wire compatibility with proto2 clients even if the server is using
> proto3. I haven't done any research in this area yet so others can fill in
> details if they are aware.
>
> Given this is a major release I would like to see us move towards proper
> change logs and release notes in the published announcement instead of the
> haiku/picture thing, something I also lamented about in the new website
> proposal
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062569/Improving%20the%20Apache%20Ozone%20Website.pdf
> >.
> We can consider that practice "deprecated" too ; )
>
> A new website debut with 2.0 would be great in theory but unfortunately our
> docs contributions remain almost zero despite the framework being live for
> over 6 months now, so that seems unlikely. I do have plans to take on the
> homepage and community sections soon but going forward I can't write 200+
> pages of technical docs on my own:
>
> > $ ./progress.sh
> > Total pages: 203
> > ------------
> > Complete pages: 1
> > ------------
> > Incomplete pages: 202
>
>
> Ethan
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:42 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > We will keep OBS for sure.
> >
> > I'm coming up with a release plan. Will share it shortly.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:50 PM Kohei Sugihara <ks...@preferred.jp>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, all
> > >
> > > > I'd also like to propose to deprecate
> > > > LEGACY bucket type
> > >
> > > Can we keep using the OBS bucket type after the deprecation?
> > >
> > > 2024年8月28日(水) 8:32 Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > I'd also like to propose to deprecate
> > > >
> > > > LEGACY bucket type
> > > > O3fs file system
> > > > IIRC we're still testing Hadoop 3.1 and 3.2 runtime. Can we drop it
> > too?
> > > >
> > > > Anything else?
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:12 PM Guo Hao <gu...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 for Ozone 2.0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > At 2024-08-24 01:48:38, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >+1 for Ozone 2.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >It would be great if we can also replace proto 2 with proto 3.
> > > However,
> > > > > it
> > > > > >will take some time for the replacement. It probably has to wait
> > till
> > > > > >Ozone 3.0. Hopefully, it won't be 4 more years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >@Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> , thanks a lot for starting
> > the
> > > > > >discussion!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >Tsz-Wo
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 7:59 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> weichiu@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> There's also Website v2 that's been cooking for quite a while
> now.
> > > > > >> HDDS-9225
> > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9225>
> > > > > >> Good opportunity for optics.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:19 PM Yi-Sheng Lien <
> yisheng@apache.org
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > +1
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> 於 2024年8月23日
> 週五
> > > > 上午6:31
> > > > > >> 寫道：
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > Hi,
> > > > > >> > > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it
> 2.0
> > > > > instead.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Reason being:
> > > > > >> > > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > > > > >> > > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its
> > > maturity
> > > > > and
> > > > > >> > > functionalities have changed so much.
> > > > > >> > > (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> > > > > >> > > (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we
> > significantly
> > > > > >> enhanced
> > > > > >> > it
> > > > > >> > > in the coming release.
> > > > > >> > > (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> > > > > >> > > (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very
> > > different
> > > > > now.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > weichiu@apache.org>
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> > > > > >> > > > What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2
> > release
> > > > > 2.10.2
> > > > > >> > was
> > > > > >> > > > two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2
> > at
> > > > all.
> > > > > >> > > > Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to
> > > > maintain.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > > weichiu@apache.org
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> Hi community,
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0
> release.
> > > > There
> > > > > >> have
> > > > > >> > > >> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with
> > > 1,130
> > > > > >> commits
> > > > > >> > > >> <
> > > https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master>
> > > > > >> added
> > > > > >> > to
> > > > > >> > > >> the git history.
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next
> > minor
> > > > > >> release.
> > > > > >> > > >> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of
> > > 1.5.0
> > > > at
> > > > > >> this
> > > > > >> > > >> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included
> are:
> > > > > >> > > >> * HBase support HDDS-7593
> > > > > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
> > > > > >> > > >> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
> > > > > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
> > > > > >> > > >> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
> > > > > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> Improvements
> > > > > >> > > >> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <
> > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >> * CVE updates
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes
> me
> > > > even
> > > > > >> more
> > > > > >> > > >> excited!
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >> Best,
> > > > > >> > > >> Weichiu
> > > > > >> > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kohei Sugihara, Engineer
> > > Preferred Networks, Inc.
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Ethan Rose <er...@apache.org>.
Thanks a lot for driving this Wei-Chiu, I'm +1 for deprecating legacy
buckets and o3fs as well. The release plan will need to specify how these
deprecations are implemented and what the impacts will be. For example,
legacy buckets will likely remain readable and writable but creation of new
ones will be blocked. This will have impacts on clients older than version
1.2.0.
Other ideas to consider for a major release:
- Removing STAND_ALONE replication type (it should be the same as RATIS
1): HDDS-6218 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-6218>
- CLI cleanup such that all subcommands and flags use kebab-case and
double dash for long options.
- This is a more involved project that we might not have time for.
Ideally all current non-compliant commands would still work but remain
hidden in help messages.
- We would need an enforcement plan going forward to make sure new
CLI options remain consistent. CI can get us part of the way
there but some
sort of manual guideline document would also need to be drafted and
enforced by reviewers.
Regarding proto2 to proto3 migration, Pifta had some ideas in the last
community sync that this may not actually be too complicated and we could
maintain wire compatibility with proto2 clients even if the server is using
proto3. I haven't done any research in this area yet so others can fill in
details if they are aware.
Given this is a major release I would like to see us move towards proper
change logs and release notes in the published announcement instead of the
haiku/picture thing, something I also lamented about in the new website
proposal
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/13062569/Improving%20the%20Apache%20Ozone%20Website.pdf>.
We can consider that practice "deprecated" too ; )
A new website debut with 2.0 would be great in theory but unfortunately our
docs contributions remain almost zero despite the framework being live for
over 6 months now, so that seems unlikely. I do have plans to take on the
homepage and community sections soon but going forward I can't write 200+
pages of technical docs on my own:
> $ ./progress.sh
> Total pages: 203
> ------------
> Complete pages: 1
> ------------
> Incomplete pages: 202
Ethan
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 11:42 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> wrote:
> We will keep OBS for sure.
>
> I'm coming up with a release plan. Will share it shortly.
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:50 PM Kohei Sugihara <ks...@preferred.jp>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi, all
> >
> > > I'd also like to propose to deprecate
> > > LEGACY bucket type
> >
> > Can we keep using the OBS bucket type after the deprecation?
> >
> > 2024年8月28日(水) 8:32 Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > I'd also like to propose to deprecate
> > >
> > > LEGACY bucket type
> > > O3fs file system
> > > IIRC we're still testing Hadoop 3.1 and 3.2 runtime. Can we drop it
> too?
> > >
> > > Anything else?
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:12 PM Guo Hao <gu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for Ozone 2.0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 2024-08-24 01:48:38, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >+1 for Ozone 2.0
> > > > >
> > > > >> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > > > >
> > > > >It would be great if we can also replace proto 2 with proto 3.
> > However,
> > > > it
> > > > >will take some time for the replacement. It probably has to wait
> till
> > > > >Ozone 3.0. Hopefully, it won't be 4 more years.
> > > > >
> > > > >@Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> , thanks a lot for starting
> the
> > > > >discussion!
> > > > >
> > > > >Tsz-Wo
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 7:59 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weichiu@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> There's also Website v2 that's been cooking for quite a while now.
> > > > >> HDDS-9225
> > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9225>
> > > > >> Good opportunity for optics.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:19 PM Yi-Sheng Lien <yisheng@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > +1
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> 於 2024年8月23日 週五
> > > 上午6:31
> > > > >> 寫道：
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Hi,
> > > > >> > > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0
> > > > instead.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Reason being:
> > > > >> > > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > > > >> > > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its
> > maturity
> > > > and
> > > > >> > > functionalities have changed so much.
> > > > >> > > (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> > > > >> > > (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we
> significantly
> > > > >> enhanced
> > > > >> > it
> > > > >> > > in the coming release.
> > > > >> > > (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> > > > >> > > (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very
> > different
> > > > now.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > weichiu@apache.org>
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> > > > >> > > > What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2
> release
> > > > 2.10.2
> > > > >> > was
> > > > >> > > > two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2
> at
> > > all.
> > > > >> > > > Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to
> > > maintain.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > > weichiu@apache.org
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> Hi community,
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release.
> > > There
> > > > >> have
> > > > >> > > >> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with
> > 1,130
> > > > >> commits
> > > > >> > > >> <
> > https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master>
> > > > >> added
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> > > >> the git history.
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next
> minor
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >> > > >> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of
> > 1.5.0
> > > at
> > > > >> this
> > > > >> > > >> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
> > > > >> > > >> * HBase support HDDS-7593
> > > > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
> > > > >> > > >> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
> > > > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
> > > > >> > > >> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
> > > > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> Improvements
> > > > >> > > >> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <
> > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > >> * CVE updates
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me
> > > even
> > > > >> more
> > > > >> > > >> excited!
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >> Best,
> > > > >> > > >> Weichiu
> > > > >> > > >>
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Kohei Sugihara, Engineer
> > Preferred Networks, Inc.
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>.
We will keep OBS for sure.
I'm coming up with a release plan. Will share it shortly.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:50 PM Kohei Sugihara <ks...@preferred.jp>
wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> > I'd also like to propose to deprecate
> > LEGACY bucket type
>
> Can we keep using the OBS bucket type after the deprecation?
>
> 2024年8月28日(水) 8:32 Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>:
>
> > I'd also like to propose to deprecate
> >
> > LEGACY bucket type
> > O3fs file system
> > IIRC we're still testing Hadoop 3.1 and 3.2 runtime. Can we drop it too?
> >
> > Anything else?
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:12 PM Guo Hao <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for Ozone 2.0
> > >
> > >
> > > At 2024-08-24 01:48:38, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >+1 for Ozone 2.0
> > > >
> > > >> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > > >
> > > >It would be great if we can also replace proto 2 with proto 3.
> However,
> > > it
> > > >will take some time for the replacement. It probably has to wait till
> > > >Ozone 3.0. Hopefully, it won't be 4 more years.
> > > >
> > > >@Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> , thanks a lot for starting the
> > > >discussion!
> > > >
> > > >Tsz-Wo
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 7:59 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> There's also Website v2 that's been cooking for quite a while now.
> > > >> HDDS-9225
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9225>
> > > >> Good opportunity for optics.
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:19 PM Yi-Sheng Lien <yi...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > +1
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> 於 2024年8月23日 週五
> > 上午6:31
> > > >> 寫道：
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Hi,
> > > >> > > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0
> > > instead.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Reason being:
> > > >> > > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > > >> > > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its
> maturity
> > > and
> > > >> > > functionalities have changed so much.
> > > >> > > (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> > > >> > > (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly
> > > >> enhanced
> > > >> > it
> > > >> > > in the coming release.
> > > >> > > (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> > > >> > > (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very
> different
> > > now.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > weichiu@apache.org>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> > > >> > > > What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release
> > > 2.10.2
> > > >> > was
> > > >> > > > two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at
> > all.
> > > >> > > > Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to
> > maintain.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > > weichiu@apache.org
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> Hi community,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release.
> > There
> > > >> have
> > > >> > > >> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with
> 1,130
> > > >> commits
> > > >> > > >> <
> https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master>
> > > >> added
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > >> the git history.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor
> > > >> release.
> > > >> > > >> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of
> 1.5.0
> > at
> > > >> this
> > > >> > > >> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
> > > >> > > >> * HBase support HDDS-7593
> > > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
> > > >> > > >> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
> > > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
> > > >> > > >> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
> > > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Improvements
> > > >> > > >> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <
> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> * CVE updates
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me
> > even
> > > >> more
> > > >> > > >> excited!
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Best,
> > > >> > > >> Weichiu
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Kohei Sugihara, Engineer
> Preferred Networks, Inc.
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Kohei Sugihara <ks...@preferred.jp>.
Hi, all
> I'd also like to propose to deprecate
> LEGACY bucket type
Can we keep using the OBS bucket type after the deprecation?
2024年8月28日(水) 8:32 Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>:
> I'd also like to propose to deprecate
>
> LEGACY bucket type
> O3fs file system
> IIRC we're still testing Hadoop 3.1 and 3.2 runtime. Can we drop it too?
>
> Anything else?
>
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:12 PM Guo Hao <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 for Ozone 2.0
> >
> >
> > At 2024-08-24 01:48:38, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >+1 for Ozone 2.0
> > >
> > >> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > >
> > >It would be great if we can also replace proto 2 with proto 3. However,
> > it
> > >will take some time for the replacement. It probably has to wait till
> > >Ozone 3.0. Hopefully, it won't be 4 more years.
> > >
> > >@Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> , thanks a lot for starting the
> > >discussion!
> > >
> > >Tsz-Wo
> > >
> > >
> > >On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 7:59 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> There's also Website v2 that's been cooking for quite a while now.
> > >> HDDS-9225
> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9225>
> > >> Good opportunity for optics.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:19 PM Yi-Sheng Lien <yi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1
> > >> >
> > >> > Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> 於 2024年8月23日 週五
> 上午6:31
> > >> 寫道：
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0
> > instead.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Reason being:
> > >> > > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > >> > > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity
> > and
> > >> > > functionalities have changed so much.
> > >> > > (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> > >> > > (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly
> > >> enhanced
> > >> > it
> > >> > > in the coming release.
> > >> > > (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> > >> > > (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very different
> > now.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > weichiu@apache.org>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> > >> > > > What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release
> > 2.10.2
> > >> > was
> > >> > > > two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at
> all.
> > >> > > > Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to
> maintain.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> > weichiu@apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Hi community,
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release.
> There
> > >> have
> > >> > > >> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130
> > >> commits
> > >> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master>
> > >> added
> > >> > to
> > >> > > >> the git history.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor
> > >> release.
> > >> > > >> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of 1.5.0
> at
> > >> this
> > >> > > >> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
> > >> > > >> * HBase support HDDS-7593
> > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
> > >> > > >> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
> > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
> > >> > > >> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
> > >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Improvements
> > >> > > >> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> * CVE updates
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me
> even
> > >> more
> > >> > > >> excited!
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Best,
> > >> > > >> Weichiu
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>
--
Kohei Sugihara, Engineer
Preferred Networks, Inc.
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>.
I'd also like to propose to deprecate
LEGACY bucket type
O3fs file system
IIRC we're still testing Hadoop 3.1 and 3.2 runtime. Can we drop it too?
Anything else?
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:12 PM Guo Hao <gu...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 for Ozone 2.0
>
>
> At 2024-08-24 01:48:38, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >+1 for Ozone 2.0
> >
> >> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> >
> >It would be great if we can also replace proto 2 with proto 3. However,
> it
> >will take some time for the replacement. It probably has to wait till
> >Ozone 3.0. Hopefully, it won't be 4 more years.
> >
> >@Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> , thanks a lot for starting the
> >discussion!
> >
> >Tsz-Wo
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 7:59 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> There's also Website v2 that's been cooking for quite a while now.
> >> HDDS-9225
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9225>
> >> Good opportunity for optics.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:19 PM Yi-Sheng Lien <yi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> 於 2024年8月23日 週五 上午6:31
> >> 寫道：
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0
> instead.
> >> > >
> >> > > Reason being:
> >> > > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> >> > > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity
> and
> >> > > functionalities have changed so much.
> >> > > (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> >> > > (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly
> >> enhanced
> >> > it
> >> > > in the coming release.
> >> > > (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> >> > > (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very different
> now.
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> weichiu@apache.org>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> >> > > > What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release
> 2.10.2
> >> > was
> >> > > > two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at all.
> >> > > > Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to maintain.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <
> weichiu@apache.org
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Hi community,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There
> >> have
> >> > > >> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130
> >> commits
> >> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master>
> >> added
> >> > to
> >> > > >> the git history.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor
> >> release.
> >> > > >> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of 1.5.0 at
> >> this
> >> > > >> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
> >> > > >> * HBase support HDDS-7593
> >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
> >> > > >> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
> >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
> >> > > >> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
> >> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Improvements
> >> > > >> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> * CVE updates
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me even
> >> more
> >> > > >> excited!
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Best,
> >> > > >> Weichiu
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Guo Hao <gu...@apache.org>.
+1 for Ozone 2.0
At 2024-08-24 01:48:38, "Tsz Wo Sze" <sz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1 for Ozone 2.0
>
>> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
>
>It would be great if we can also replace proto 2 with proto 3. However, it
>will take some time for the replacement. It probably has to wait till
>Ozone 3.0. Hopefully, it won't be 4 more years.
>
>@Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> , thanks a lot for starting the
>discussion!
>
>Tsz-Wo
>
>
>On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 7:59 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> There's also Website v2 that's been cooking for quite a while now.
>> HDDS-9225
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9225>
>> Good opportunity for optics.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:19 PM Yi-Sheng Lien <yi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> 於 2024年8月23日 週五 上午6:31
>> 寫道：
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0 instead.
>> > >
>> > > Reason being:
>> > > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
>> > > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity and
>> > > functionalities have changed so much.
>> > > (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
>> > > (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly
>> enhanced
>> > it
>> > > in the coming release.
>> > > (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
>> > > (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very different now.
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Oh actually I forgot to mention:
>> > > > What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release 2.10.2
>> > was
>> > > > two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at all.
>> > > > Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to maintain.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weichiu@apache.org
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Hi community,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There
>> have
>> > > >> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130
>> commits
>> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master>
>> added
>> > to
>> > > >> the git history.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor
>> release.
>> > > >> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of 1.5.0 at
>> this
>> > > >> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
>> > > >> * HBase support HDDS-7593
>> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
>> > > >> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
>> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
>> > > >> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
>> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Improvements
>> > > >> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153
>> > > >
>> > > >> * CVE updates
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me even
>> more
>> > > >> excited!
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Best,
>> > > >> Weichiu
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Tsz Wo Sze <sz...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Ozone 2.0
> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
It would be great if we can also replace proto 2 with proto 3. However, it
will take some time for the replacement. It probably has to wait till
Ozone 3.0. Hopefully, it won't be 4 more years.
@Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> , thanks a lot for starting the
discussion!
Tsz-Wo
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 7:59 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org> wrote:
> There's also Website v2 that's been cooking for quite a while now.
> HDDS-9225
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9225>
> Good opportunity for optics.
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:19 PM Yi-Sheng Lien <yi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> 於 2024年8月23日 週五 上午6:31
> 寫道：
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0 instead.
> > >
> > > Reason being:
> > > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity and
> > > functionalities have changed so much.
> > > (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> > > (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly
> enhanced
> > it
> > > in the coming release.
> > > (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> > > (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very different now.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> > > > What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release 2.10.2
> > was
> > > > two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at all.
> > > > Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to maintain.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weichiu@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi community,
> > > >>
> > > >> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There
> have
> > > >> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130
> commits
> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master>
> added
> > to
> > > >> the git history.
> > > >>
> > > >> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor
> release.
> > > >> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of 1.5.0 at
> this
> > > >> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
> > > >>
> > > >> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
> > > >> * HBase support HDDS-7593
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
> > > >> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
> > > >> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
> > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
> > > >>
> > > >> Improvements
> > > >> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153
> > > >
> > > >> * CVE updates
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me even
> more
> > > >> excited!
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Weichiu
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>.
There's also Website v2 that's been cooking for quite a while now. HDDS-9225
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-9225>
Good opportunity for optics.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:19 PM Yi-Sheng Lien <yi...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> 於 2024年8月23日 週五 上午6:31 寫道：
>
> > Hi,
> > I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0 instead.
> >
> > Reason being:
> > (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> > (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity and
> > functionalities have changed so much.
> > (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> > (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly enhanced
> it
> > in the coming release.
> > (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> > (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very different now.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> > > What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release 2.10.2
> was
> > > two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at all.
> > > Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to maintain.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi community,
> > >>
> > >> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There have
> > >> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130 commits
> > >> <https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master> added
> to
> > >> the git history.
> > >>
> > >> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor release.
> > >> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of 1.5.0 at this
> > >> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
> > >>
> > >> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
> > >> * HBase support HDDS-7593
> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
> > >> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
> > >> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
> > >>
> > >> Improvements
> > >> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153
> > >
> > >> * CVE updates
> > >>
> > >> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me even more
> > >> excited!
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Weichiu
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 2.0 release was: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ozone 1.5.0 release
Posted by Yi-Sheng Lien <yi...@apache.org>.
+1
Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@cloudera.com.invalid> 於 2024年8月23日 週五 上午6:31 寫道：
> Hi,
> I want to throw out another idea: we should be calling it 2.0 instead.
>
> Reason being:
> (1) I want to drop Hadoop2 support.
> (2) Ozone 1.0 was exactly 4 years ago. In many ways, its maturity and
> functionalities have changed so much.
> (3) The HBase support is a significant change.
> (4) While Snapshot support was added in 1.4.0, we significantly enhanced it
> in the coming release.
> (5) JDK 17 support also signifies another great milestone.
> (6) Recon UI went through a major revamp and looks very different now.
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 12:44 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Oh actually I forgot to mention:
> > What about dropping Hadoop2 support? The last Hadoop2 release 2.10.2 was
> > two years ago and I am not sure who else is using Hadoop 2 at all.
> > Dropping it will simplify our code, making it easier to maintain.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 11:55 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang <we...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi community,
> >>
> >> I’d like to initiate a discussion about the 1.5.0 release. There have
> >> been significant changes since 1.4.0 (January 2024) with 1,130 commits
> >> <https://github.com/apache/ozone/compare/ozone-1.4.0...master> added to
> >> the git history.
> >>
> >> I think it’s a good time to start planning for the next minor release.
> >> Wouldn't it be great if we could announce the release of 1.5.0 at this
> >> year's CommunityOverCode conference?
> >>
> >> Some of the major features I’m excited to see included are:
> >> * HBase support HDDS-7593
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-7593>
> >> * Snapshot support phase 2 HDDS-8544
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8544>
> >> * JDK17 support HDDS-8246
> >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-8246>
> >>
> >> Improvements
> >> * Recon UI HDDS-11153 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-11153
> >
> >> * CVE updates
> >>
> >> I'm sure there's more to look forward to, and that makes me even more
> >> excited!
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Weichiu
> >>
> >
>