[Fwd: Re: LICENSE file(s)]

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Just a footnote from legal-discuss that the win32 nmake -f Makefile.win install
isn't moving NOTICE (yet) to the target tree, and once we do that, we need to
then staple it into the installer.  Trivial but needed to be noted.

LICENSE still has our mongo-long-list-of-collected licenses.  IIUC this is no
longer the way we do things.  So I'll chew on the bullet above, if someone
else will take on this question of what goes in LICENSE (only ASL 2, iiuc)
and where the rest of these go.

Bill

Re: [Fwd: Re: LICENSE file(s)]

[Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>]

On 5/10/06, Roy T. Fielding <fi...@gbiv.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 2006, at 2:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > Just a footnote from legal-discuss that the win32 nmake -f
> > Makefile.win install
> > isn't moving NOTICE (yet) to the target tree, and once we do that,
> > we need to
> > then staple it into the installer.  Trivial but needed to be noted.
>
> yes, please -- it is mandatory on all distributions.

Yup.

> > LICENSE still has our mongo-long-list-of-collected licenses.  IIUC
> > this is no
> > longer the way we do things.
>
> Eh? It is still the way we do things.

Agreed.  LICENSE contains all terms for all code in the package.  That
hasn't changed - i.e. the LICENSE file as-is is correct.  -- justin

Re: [Fwd: Re: LICENSE file(s)]

["Roy T. Fielding" <fi...@gbiv.com>]

On May 10, 2006, at 2:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Just a footnote from legal-discuss that the win32 nmake -f  
> Makefile.win install
> isn't moving NOTICE (yet) to the target tree, and once we do that,  
> we need to
> then staple it into the installer.  Trivial but needed to be noted.

yes, please -- it is mandatory on all distributions.

> LICENSE still has our mongo-long-list-of-collected licenses.  IIUC  
> this is no
> longer the way we do things.

Eh? It is still the way we do things.

....Roy