You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Pas Filip (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/07 17:17:04 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (LANG-1152) FastDateFormat seems to behave
differently with very large dates than simple date format
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Pas Filip updated LANG-1152:
----------------------------
Description:
Inconsistent behaviour compared to SimpleDateFormat.
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException using one format and no exception when using another format. (both legal).
Different results when using another format.
Testcase:
import org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat;
import org.hamcrest.Matchers;
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Test;
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;
public class FastDateFormatBug {
@Test
public void testFastFormatWitLongMaxValue(){
Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
String dateAsString = FastDateFormat.getInstance("yyyy-MM-dd").format(date);
Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
}
@Test
public void testWeirdResultWithMaxValue(){
Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
String dateAsString = FastDateFormat.getInstance("dd/MM/yyyy").format(date);
Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
}
@Test
public void testSimpleFormatWithLongMaxValueWithLenientOff(){
Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
SimpleDateFormat fft = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
fft.setLenient(false);
String dateAsString = fft.format(date);
Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
}
@Test
public void testSimpleFormatWithLongMaxValueWithLenientOn(){
Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
SimpleDateFormat fft = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
fft.setLenient(true);
String dateAsString = fft.format(date);
Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
}
}
was:
Inconsistent behaviour compared to SimpleDateFormat.
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException using one format and no exception when using another format. (both legal).
Testcase:
import org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat;
import org.hamcrest.Matchers;
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Test;
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;
public class FastDateFormatBug {
@Test
public void testFastFormatWitLongMaxValue(){
Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
String dateAsString = FastDateFormat.getInstance("yyyy-MM-dd").format(date);
Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
}
@Test
public void testWeirdResultWithMaxValue(){
Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
String dateAsString = FastDateFormat.getInstance("dd/MM/yyyy").format(date);
Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
}
@Test
public void testSimpleFormatWithLongMaxValueWithLenientOff(){
Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
SimpleDateFormat fft = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
fft.setLenient(false);
String dateAsString = fft.format(date);
Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
}
@Test
public void testSimpleFormatWithLongMaxValueWithLenientOn(){
Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
SimpleDateFormat fft = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
fft.setLenient(true);
String dateAsString = fft.format(date);
Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
}
}
> FastDateFormat seems to behave differently with very large dates than simple date format
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-1152
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1152
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lang.time.*
> Affects Versions: 3.x
> Environment: ANY
> Reporter: Pas Filip
> Priority: Minor
>
> Inconsistent behaviour compared to SimpleDateFormat.
> StringIndexOutOfBoundsException using one format and no exception when using another format. (both legal).
> Different results when using another format.
> Testcase:
> import org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat;
> import org.hamcrest.Matchers;
> import org.junit.Assert;
> import org.junit.Test;
> import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
> import java.util.Date;
> public class FastDateFormatBug {
> @Test
> public void testFastFormatWitLongMaxValue(){
> Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
> String dateAsString = FastDateFormat.getInstance("yyyy-MM-dd").format(date);
> Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
> }
> @Test
> public void testWeirdResultWithMaxValue(){
> Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
> String dateAsString = FastDateFormat.getInstance("dd/MM/yyyy").format(date);
> Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
> }
> @Test
> public void testSimpleFormatWithLongMaxValueWithLenientOff(){
> Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
> SimpleDateFormat fft = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
> fft.setLenient(false);
> String dateAsString = fft.format(date);
> Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
> }
> @Test
> public void testSimpleFormatWithLongMaxValueWithLenientOn(){
> Date date = new Date(Long.MAX_VALUE);
> SimpleDateFormat fft = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
> fft.setLenient(true);
> String dateAsString = fft.format(date);
> Assert.assertThat(dateAsString, Matchers.equalTo("292278994-08-17"));
> }
> }
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)