You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by "Ismael Juma (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/12/18 20:22:46 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-3014) Integer overflow causes incorrect
node iteration in leastLoadedNode()
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15064548#comment-15064548 ]
Ismael Juma commented on KAFKA-3014:
------------------------------------
Nice catch!
> Integer overflow causes incorrect node iteration in leastLoadedNode()
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-3014
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3014
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jason Gustafson
> Assignee: Jason Gustafson
>
> The leastLoadedNode() implementation iterates over all the known nodes to find a suitable candidate for sending metadata. The loop looks like this:
> {code}
> for (int i = 0; i < nodes.size(); i++) {
> int idx = Utils.abs((this.nodeIndexOffset + i) % nodes.size());
> Node node = nodes.get(idx);
> ...
> }
> {code}
> Unfortunately, this doesn't handle integer overflow correctly, which can result in some nodes in the list being passed over. For example, if the size of the node list is 5 and the random offset is Integer.MAX_VALUE, then the loop will iterate over the following indices: 2, 3, 2, 1, 0.
> In pathological cases, this can prevent the client from being able to connect to good nodes in order to refresh metadata.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)