You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2013/06/28 19:55:50 UTC
[quickpoll] bundle apr-util 1.4.1 or 1.5.2 with httpd 2.2.25?
Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
[ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
[ ] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
Re: [quickpoll] bundle apr-util 1.4.1 or 1.5.2 with httpd 2.2.25?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Jun 28, 2013, at 1:55 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
>
> [X] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
>
And for 2.4.x as well.
Re: [quickpoll] bundle apr-util 1.4.1 or 1.5.2 with httpd 2.2.25?
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 28.06.2013 19:55, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
>
> [ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
> [X] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
Rainer
Re: [quickpoll] bundle apr-util 1.4.1 or 1.5.2 with httpd 2.2.25?
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
>
> [ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
> [ X ] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
>
>
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: [quickpoll] bundle apr-util 1.4.1 or 1.5.2 with httpd 2.2.25?
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net>wrote:
> Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
>
> [ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
> [ ] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
>
>
[X] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
http://emptyhammock.com/