You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by SteveKing <st...@gmx.ch> on 2004/07/07 17:30:11 UTC
request for backport
Hi,
Could someone please mention the change in revision 10144 in the CHANGES
file for the 1.0.6 release?
And I know my vote for this doesn't really count, but I reviewed that
patch and would approve it - so maybe my vote could count half ;)
The log for that revision:
Fix a bug in get_dir_status that makes us call handle_dir_entry with a
null entry pointer which makes it crash.
* subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c
(get_dir_status): Only call handle_dir_entry if the entry is versioned.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by Tobias Ringström <to...@ringstrom.mine.nu>.
SteveKing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please mention the change in revision 10144 in the
> CHANGES file for the 1.0.6 release?
> And I know my vote for this doesn't really count, but I reviewed that
> patch and would approve it - so maybe my vote could count half ;)
It's there now. Sorry for the delay.
/Tobias
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by Stefan <st...@tigris.org>.
Ben Reser wrote:
> I'll plan on doing a 1.0.6 on Wednesday, July 14th. That'll give us
> time to finish up 1.1 issues this week and to review, vote, etc.. on
> 1.0.6 the first part of next.
>
Great! Thanks a lot for doing this.
I'll make another TSVN release right after the 1.0.6 release.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Re: request for backport
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:03:17PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Hmmm. Yup, remember that post now, sorry for ignoring it.
>
> Ben Reser, what would you think of doing a 1.0.6?
>
> Steve, my feeling is to leave this one up to Ben. I certainly
> understand where you're coming from. But with 1.1 on the horizon
> anyway, he may want to minimize work. On the other hand, if he's okay
> with it, then I'd be +1 on a 1.0.6... And sussman may have a few other
> issues to throw on the heap, if it happens (he'll follow up).
I'll plan on doing a 1.0.6 on Wednesday, July 14th. That'll give us
time to finish up 1.1 issues this week and to review, vote, etc.. on
1.0.6 the first part of next.
--
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 15:03, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Ben Reser, what would you think of doing a 1.0.6?
>
> Steve, my feeling is to leave this one up to Ben. I certainly
> understand where you're coming from. But with 1.1 on the horizon
> anyway, he may want to minimize work. On the other hand, if he's okay
> with it, then I'd be +1 on a 1.0.6... And sussman may have a few other
> issues to throw on the heap, if it happens (he'll follow up).
Yah, it seems like at least 50% of all SVN users are really TSVN users.
So this bug is a pretty big deal. I have other things that I think are
important as well:
- fix for mod_authz_svn read-authz hole (#1949)
- bundle & require neon 0.24.7, to fix zlib network errors
- revprop crash (#1904)
- control-C auth prompts (#1916), which people complain about.
These aren't in STATUS yet, but I'll put them there soon.
In any case, the "freeze" coming this weekend isn't really a big deal.
We're just making a branch, and then sitting on it for 4 weeks. Maybe
breser has time to do a 1.0.6 release next week. It's his call.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
SteveKing <st...@gmx.ch> writes:
> Ok, I'd like to point out again my request for the backport:
> Revision 10144 fixes a crash when fetching the status. I discovered
> this crash because people complained about TSVN crashing their
> desktop. It took a while until someone could send me a stacktrace of
> such a crash (after all, when this happens a part of the OS itself
> (the desktop) crashes, so that makes debugging very hard), but the
> crash happens on several peoples machines. Now, if the desktop crashes
> (TSVN integrates into the explorer, which is a part of the desktop)
> then the user usually has to reboot or log off and on again.
>
> TSVN consists of two parts: the main part which does all the work, and
> the shell integration part which draws the icon overlays and provides
> the context menu. The shell integration part only uses the
> svn_client_status() API, nothing else (i.e. no repository access at
> all). So bugs in other parts than svn_client_status() are not that
> critical for TSVN, but in svn_client_status() they are.
>
> So in my opinion such a fix has a high priority - at least for TSVN.
Hmmm. Yup, remember that post now, sorry for ignoring it.
Ben Reser, what would you think of doing a 1.0.6?
Steve, my feeling is to leave this one up to Ben. I certainly
understand where you're coming from. But with 1.1 on the horizon
anyway, he may want to minimize work. On the other hand, if he's okay
with it, then I'd be +1 on a 1.0.6... And sussman may have a few other
issues to throw on the heap, if it happens (he'll follow up).
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by SteveKing <st...@gmx.ch>.
kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> There's no consensus that there's ever going to be a 1.0.6 release.
> Right now, the next release firmly on the map is 1.1.0. There would
> be a 1.0.6 if someone discovered a bug in the 1.0.x line so serious
> that it demands a patch release, but so far, no one has, to the best
> of my knowledge.
Ok, I'd like to point out again my request for the backport:
Revision 10144 fixes a crash when fetching the status. I discovered this
crash because people complained about TSVN crashing their desktop. It
took a while until someone could send me a stacktrace of such a crash
(after all, when this happens a part of the OS itself (the desktop)
crashes, so that makes debugging very hard), but the crash happens on
several peoples machines. Now, if the desktop crashes (TSVN integrates
into the explorer, which is a part of the desktop) then the user usually
has to reboot or log off and on again.
TSVN consists of two parts: the main part which does all the work, and
the shell integration part which draws the icon overlays and provides
the context menu. The shell integration part only uses the
svn_client_status() API, nothing else (i.e. no repository access at
all). So bugs in other parts than svn_client_status() are not that
critical for TSVN, but in svn_client_status() they are.
So in my opinion such a fix has a high priority - at least for TSVN.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
SteveKing <st...@gmx.ch> writes:
> If possible, I'd like to have the 1.0.6 released about the same time
> the 1.1 branch is created. That way I could release a last TSVN
> version linked to 1.0.6 before I switch over to 1.1.
There's no consensus that there's ever going to be a 1.0.6 release.
Right now, the next release firmly on the map is 1.1.0. There would
be a 1.0.6 if someone discovered a bug in the 1.0.x line so serious
that it demands a patch release, but so far, no one has, to the best
of my knowledge.
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by SteveKing <st...@gmx.ch>.
kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> SteveKing <st...@gmx.ch> writes:
>
>>Ok, I guess I have to wait then for 1.1.
>>But if fixed bugs don't get even mentioned for the 1.0.6 release,
>>there will never be enough critical bugs in there to justify the
>>relese ;)
>
>
> Right.
>
> Remember, the 1.0.x release will *stop* at some point in the
> not-so-distant future. We may do a 1.0.6, and even a 1.0.7 if there's
> some critical bug, but the 1.1.x line is supposed to take over
> eventually.
Yes, I'm aware of that. I'm eagerly waiting for a 1.1 branch or the
first tag of that line so I can switch over and adjust TSVN to use it.
Once 1.1 comes out, I will stop releasing TSVN versions linked 1.0.x too
and work only on the 1.1 branch.
If possible, I'd like to have the 1.0.6 released about the same time the
1.1 branch is created. That way I could release a last TSVN version
linked to 1.0.6 before I switch over to 1.1.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
SteveKing <st...@gmx.ch> writes:
> Ok, I guess I have to wait then for 1.1.
> But if fixed bugs don't get even mentioned for the 1.0.6 release,
> there will never be enough critical bugs in there to justify the
> relese ;)
Right.
Remember, the 1.0.x release will *stop* at some point in the
not-so-distant future. We may do a 1.0.6, and even a 1.0.7 if there's
some critical bug, but the 1.1.x line is supposed to take over
eventually.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by SteveKing <st...@gmx.ch>.
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>>Could someone please mention the change in revision 10144 in the CHANGES
>>file for the 1.0.6 release?
>
>
> It's already in /trunk, so it may be easier to just wait for 1.1 in a
> month.
>
> I'm not so sure 1.0.6 will be released before 1.1; I know that certain
> folks believe that there's no bug currently critical enough to justify
> the effort of a 1.0.6 release.
Ok, I guess I have to wait then for 1.1.
But if fixed bugs don't get even mentioned for the 1.0.6 release, there
will never be enough critical bugs in there to justify the relese ;)
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: request for backport
Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 12:30, SteveKing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone please mention the change in revision 10144 in the CHANGES
> file for the 1.0.6 release?
It's already in /trunk, so it may be easier to just wait for 1.1 in a
month.
I'm not so sure 1.0.6 will be released before 1.1; I know that certain
folks believe that there's no bug currently critical enough to justify
the effort of a 1.0.6 release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org