You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to scm@geronimo.apache.org by ad...@apache.org on 2005/12/13 08:39:52 UTC
svn commit: r356499 - /geronimo/specs/branches/1_0/
Author: adc
Date: Mon Dec 12 23:39:50 2005
New Revision: 356499
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=356499&view=rev
Log:
made a copy
Added:
geronimo/specs/branches/1_0/
- copied from r356497, geronimo/specs/trunk/
Re: svn commit: r356499 - /geronimo/specs/branches/1_0/
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bill Stoddard wrote, On 12/13/2005 2:21 PM:
> adc@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: adc
>> Date: Mon Dec 12 23:39:50 2005
>> New Revision: 356499
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=356499&view=rev
>> Log:
>> made a copy
>>
>> Added:
>> geronimo/specs/branches/1_0/
>> - copied from r356497, geronimo/specs/trunk/
>>
>
> Would it be better to use the same naming convention for the specs
> branch as for the geronimo kernel, geronimo/specs/branches/1.0?
>
> foolish consistency and hobgoblins not withstanding :)
Good idea. I personally hate having dots in a directory name.
Regards,
Alan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDoGrT1xC6qnMLUpYRAtDJAJ0RftKwNLygxcuJarJmgYG6MgkxDwCdGybT
zWn8VAHsnRjlF08BkBuhfg4=
=PjSE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: svn commit: r356499 - /geronimo/specs/branches/1_0/
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
adc@apache.org wrote:
> Author: adc
> Date: Mon Dec 12 23:39:50 2005
> New Revision: 356499
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=356499&view=rev
> Log:
> made a copy
>
> Added:
> geronimo/specs/branches/1_0/
> - copied from r356497, geronimo/specs/trunk/
>
Would it be better to use the same naming convention for the specs branch as for the geronimo kernel,
geronimo/specs/branches/1.0?
foolish consistency and hobgoblins not withstanding :)
Bill