You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by ma...@yahoo.co.uk on 2003/09/24 23:44:55 UTC
New highlighter package available
Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
Features include:
* Support for highlighting all query types
* Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
* Works with latest version of Lucene
Hope you find this useful.
Mark Harwood
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Pierrick Brihaye <pi...@culture.gouv.fr>.
Hi,
Doug Cutting a écrit:
> Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
> would like to use something like this.
Yes :-) !
However, I have a few suggestions :
In : public final class QueryHighlightExtractor
Is it possible to split the logic (2 classes ?) which :
a) handles highlighting
b) grabs Query terms (method getTerms and its dependencies)
Also, could it be possible to keep as much information as possible for
terms (i.e. Term objects rather than lower-case termText) ?
Cheers,
--
Pierrick Brihaye, informaticien
Service régional de l'Inventaire
DRAC Bretagne
mailto:pierrick.brihaye@culture.fr
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Bruce Ritchie <br...@jivesoftware.com>.
Doug Cutting wrote:
> Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
> would like to use something like this.
I myself would think it would be a worthwhile addition as it is something that I think many if not
most users of lucene would use. I can't speak as to the quality of this particular implementation
though as I haven't yet had the time to look it over beyond a quick check and probably won't for a
week or two.
Regards,
Bruce Ritchie
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Pierrick Brihaye <pi...@culture.gouv.fr>.
Hi,
Doug Cutting a écrit:
> Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
> would like to use something like this.
Yes :-) !
However, I have a few suggestions :
In : public final class QueryHighlightExtractor
Is it possible to split the logic (2 classes ?) which :
a) handles highlighting
b) grabs Query terms (method getTerms and its dependencies)
Also, could it be possible to keep as much information as possible for
terms (i.e. Term objects rather than lower-case termText) ?
Cheers,
--
Pierrick Brihaye, informaticien
Service régional de l'Inventaire
DRAC Bretagne
mailto:pierrick.brihaye@culture.fr
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Hani Suleiman <ha...@formicary.net>.
Not that my vote counts or is relevant at all, but +1 to not including it,
for the same reasons below. Let Lucene focus on what it does best, and
ensure it can support addons and plugins like the highlighter, rather than
folding them in.
Otis Gospodnetic said:
> Couldn't we also stick this in the Sandbox, make sure it builds into a
> nice little Jar, and just document it in the Lucene's xdocs?
> I'm just thinking that highlighting is not something that is a
> necessary feature, so why 'polute' the core that should stay lean as it
> is today.
> The same has been done with Snowball code.
>
> I don't feel VERY strongly about this, but I do feel that not including
> it in the core would be a better thing to do. Those who need it will
> know how to get the highlighting jar and put it in their CLASSPATH.
>
> Otis
>
>
> --- Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
>> This looks great.
>>
>> Is everything cool licensing-wise with accepting this? Is it being
>> offered to us to be included?
>>
>> Just a quick glance at the code and the only thing I'd change is the
>> default hilighting pre/post strings to be <b>/</b>, or perhaps even
>> something even more general like <em>/</em> or <span
>> class="hilighted">/</span> - but that is obviously just icing.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 05:56 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>>
>> > Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
>>
>> > would like to use something like this.
>> >
>> > Doug
>> >
>> > markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> >> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>> >> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>> >> Features include:
>> >> * Support for highlighting all query types
>> >> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs *
>> Works with latest version of Lucene
>> >> Hope you find this useful.
>> >> Mark Harwood
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For
>> additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Hani Suleiman <ha...@formicary.net>.
Not that my vote counts or is relevant at all, but +1 to not including it,
for the same reasons below. Let Lucene focus on what it does best, and
ensure it can support addons and plugins like the highlighter, rather than
folding them in.
Otis Gospodnetic said:
> Couldn't we also stick this in the Sandbox, make sure it builds into a
> nice little Jar, and just document it in the Lucene's xdocs?
> I'm just thinking that highlighting is not something that is a
> necessary feature, so why 'polute' the core that should stay lean as it
> is today.
> The same has been done with Snowball code.
>
> I don't feel VERY strongly about this, but I do feel that not including
> it in the core would be a better thing to do. Those who need it will
> know how to get the highlighting jar and put it in their CLASSPATH.
>
> Otis
>
>
> --- Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
>> This looks great.
>>
>> Is everything cool licensing-wise with accepting this? Is it being
>> offered to us to be included?
>>
>> Just a quick glance at the code and the only thing I'd change is the
>> default hilighting pre/post strings to be <b>/</b>, or perhaps even
>> something even more general like <em>/</em> or <span
>> class="hilighted">/</span> - but that is obviously just icing.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 05:56 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>>
>> > Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
>>
>> > would like to use something like this.
>> >
>> > Doug
>> >
>> > markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> >> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>> >> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>> >> Features include:
>> >> * Support for highlighting all query types
>> >> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs *
>> Works with latest version of Lucene
>> >> Hope you find this useful.
>> >> Mark Harwood
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For
>> additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To
> unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Scott Ganyo <sc...@etapestry.com>.
+1. Let's keep the Lucene core focused on things that really are "core"
to indexing and retrieval.
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>Couldn't we also stick this in the Sandbox, make sure it builds into a
>nice little Jar, and just document it in the Lucene's xdocs?
>I'm just thinking that highlighting is not something that is a
>necessary feature, so why 'polute' the core that should stay lean as it
>is today.
>The same has been done with Snowball code.
>
>I don't feel VERY strongly about this, but I do feel that not including
>it in the core would be a better thing to do. Those who need it will
>know how to get the highlighting jar and put it in their CLASSPATH.
>
>Otis
>
>
>--- Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
>
>
>>This looks great.
>>
>>Is everything cool licensing-wise with accepting this? Is it being
>>offered to us to be included?
>>
>>Just a quick glance at the code and the only thing I'd change is the
>>default hilighting pre/post strings to be <b>/</b>, or perhaps even
>>something even more general like <em>/</em> or <span
>>class="hilighted">/</span> - but that is obviously just icing.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>
>>On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 05:56 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
>>>
>>>
>>>would like to use something like this.
>>>
>>>Doug
>>>
>>>markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>>>>http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>>>>Features include:
>>>>* Support for highlighting all query types
>>>>* Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
>>>>* Works with latest version of Lucene
>>>>Hope you find this useful.
>>>>Mark Harwood
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
>http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
All progress is initiated by challenging current conceptions, and executed by supplanting existing institutions. - George Bernard Shaw
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Scott Ganyo <sc...@etapestry.com>.
+1. Let's keep the Lucene core focused on things that really are "core"
to indexing and retrieval.
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
>Couldn't we also stick this in the Sandbox, make sure it builds into a
>nice little Jar, and just document it in the Lucene's xdocs?
>I'm just thinking that highlighting is not something that is a
>necessary feature, so why 'polute' the core that should stay lean as it
>is today.
>The same has been done with Snowball code.
>
>I don't feel VERY strongly about this, but I do feel that not including
>it in the core would be a better thing to do. Those who need it will
>know how to get the highlighting jar and put it in their CLASSPATH.
>
>Otis
>
>
>--- Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
>
>
>>This looks great.
>>
>>Is everything cool licensing-wise with accepting this? Is it being
>>offered to us to be included?
>>
>>Just a quick glance at the code and the only thing I'd change is the
>>default hilighting pre/post strings to be <b>/</b>, or perhaps even
>>something even more general like <em>/</em> or <span
>>class="hilighted">/</span> - but that is obviously just icing.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>
>>On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 05:56 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
>>>
>>>
>>>would like to use something like this.
>>>
>>>Doug
>>>
>>>markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>>>>http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>>>>Features include:
>>>>* Support for highlighting all query types
>>>>* Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
>>>>* Works with latest version of Lucene
>>>>Hope you find this useful.
>>>>Mark Harwood
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
>http://shopping.yahoo.com
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
All progress is initiated by challenging current conceptions, and executed by supplanting existing institutions. - George Bernard Shaw
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by petite_abeille <pe...@mac.com>.
> I don't feel VERY strongly about this, but I do feel that not including
> it in the core would be a better thing to do. Those who need it will
> know how to get the highlighting jar and put it in their CLASSPATH.
++++1 :)
--
http://zoe.nu/
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by petite_abeille <pe...@mac.com>.
> I don't feel VERY strongly about this, but I do feel that not including
> it in the core would be a better thing to do. Those who need it will
> know how to get the highlighting jar and put it in their CLASSPATH.
++++1 :)
--
http://zoe.nu/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
Couldn't we also stick this in the Sandbox, make sure it builds into a
nice little Jar, and just document it in the Lucene's xdocs?
I'm just thinking that highlighting is not something that is a
necessary feature, so why 'polute' the core that should stay lean as it
is today.
The same has been done with Snowball code.
I don't feel VERY strongly about this, but I do feel that not including
it in the core would be a better thing to do. Those who need it will
know how to get the highlighting jar and put it in their CLASSPATH.
Otis
--- Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
> This looks great.
>
> Is everything cool licensing-wise with accepting this? Is it being
> offered to us to be included?
>
> Just a quick glance at the code and the only thing I'd change is the
> default hilighting pre/post strings to be <b>/</b>, or perhaps even
> something even more general like <em>/</em> or <span
> class="hilighted">/</span> - but that is obviously just icing.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 05:56 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
> > Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
>
> > would like to use something like this.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
> >> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
> >> Features include:
> >> * Support for highlighting all query types
> >> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
> >> * Works with latest version of Lucene
> >> Hope you find this useful.
> >> Mark Harwood
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@yahoo.com>.
Couldn't we also stick this in the Sandbox, make sure it builds into a
nice little Jar, and just document it in the Lucene's xdocs?
I'm just thinking that highlighting is not something that is a
necessary feature, so why 'polute' the core that should stay lean as it
is today.
The same has been done with Snowball code.
I don't feel VERY strongly about this, but I do feel that not including
it in the core would be a better thing to do. Those who need it will
know how to get the highlighting jar and put it in their CLASSPATH.
Otis
--- Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com> wrote:
> This looks great.
>
> Is everything cool licensing-wise with accepting this? Is it being
> offered to us to be included?
>
> Just a quick glance at the code and the only thing I'd change is the
> default hilighting pre/post strings to be <b>/</b>, or perhaps even
> something even more general like <em>/</em> or <span
> class="hilighted">/</span> - but that is obviously just icing.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 05:56 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
> > Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
>
> > would like to use something like this.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> >> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
> >> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
> >> Features include:
> >> * Support for highlighting all query types
> >> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
> >> * Works with latest version of Lucene
> >> Hope you find this useful.
> >> Mark Harwood
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
This looks great.
Is everything cool licensing-wise with accepting this? Is it being
offered to us to be included?
Just a quick glance at the code and the only thing I'd change is the
default hilighting pre/post strings to be <b>/</b>, or perhaps even
something even more general like <em>/</em> or <span
class="hilighted">/</span> - but that is obviously just icing.
Erik
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 05:56 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
> would like to use something like this.
>
> Doug
>
> markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>> Features include:
>> * Support for highlighting all query types
>> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
>> * Works with latest version of Lucene
>> Hope you find this useful.
>> Mark Harwood
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE : New highlighter package available
Posted by Rasik Pandey <ra...@ajlsm.com>.
Hello Developers,
Does anyone know if this package supports highlighting in MultiSearcher
environments? Also what may be the performance implications seeing that
the method query.rewrite(reader) seems to be called twice, one for
querying, once for highlighting.
Regards,
Rasik
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Doug Cutting [mailto:cutting@lucene.com]
>Envoyé : mercredi 24 septembre 2003 23:57
>À : Lucene Developers List
>Objet : Re: New highlighter package available
>
>
>Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
>would like to use something like this.
>
>Doug
>
>markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>>
>> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>>
>> Features include:
>> * Support for highlighting all query types
>> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
>> * Works with latest version of Lucene
>>
>> Hope you find this useful.
>> Mark Harwood
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Erik Hatcher <er...@ehatchersolutions.com>.
This looks great.
Is everything cool licensing-wise with accepting this? Is it being
offered to us to be included?
Just a quick glance at the code and the only thing I'd change is the
default hilighting pre/post strings to be <b>/</b>, or perhaps even
something even more general like <em>/</em> or <span
class="hilighted">/</span> - but that is obviously just icing.
Erik
On Wednesday, September 24, 2003, at 05:56 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
> would like to use something like this.
>
> Doug
>
> markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>> Features include:
>> * Support for highlighting all query types
>> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
>> * Works with latest version of Lucene
>> Hope you find this useful.
>> Mark Harwood
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE : New highlighter package available
Posted by Rasik Pandey <ra...@ajlsm.com>.
Hello Developers,
Does anyone know if this package supports highlighting in MultiSearcher
environments? Also what may be the performance implications seeing that
the method query.rewrite(reader) seems to be called twice, one for
querying, once for highlighting.
Regards,
Rasik
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Doug Cutting [mailto:cutting@lucene.com]
>Envoyé : mercredi 24 septembre 2003 23:57
>À : Lucene Developers List
>Objet : Re: New highlighter package available
>
>
>Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
>would like to use something like this.
>
>Doug
>
>markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>>
>> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>>
>> Features include:
>> * Support for highlighting all query types
>> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
>> * Works with latest version of Lucene
>>
>> Hope you find this useful.
>> Mark Harwood
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@lucene.com>.
Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
would like to use something like this.
Doug
markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>
> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>
> Features include:
> * Support for highlighting all query types
> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
> * Works with latest version of Lucene
>
> Hope you find this useful.
> Mark Harwood
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: New highlighter package available
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@lucene.com>.
Should this be added into the Lucene core? I suspect lots of folks
would like to use something like this.
Doug
markharw00d@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> Details of a new highlighter package are available here:
>
> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>
> Features include:
> * Support for highlighting all query types
> * Support for getting "best fragments" summary from large docs
> * Works with latest version of Lucene
>
> Hope you find this useful.
> Mark Harwood