You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@jmeter.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2017/11/11 22:47:15 UTC
[Bug 61748] New: Add ability to send compressed request
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61748
Bug ID: 61748
Summary: Add ability to send compressed request
Product: JMeter
Version: 3.3
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: HTTP
Assignee: issues@jmeter.apache.org
Reporter: p.mouawad@ubik-ingenierie.com
Target Milestone: ---
We should provide a way to send compressed content.
We could detect if a header is set :
- Content-Encoding: gzip
And compress the body as a consequence
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 61748] Add ability to send compressed request
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61748
UbikLoadPack support <su...@ubikloadpack.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |support@ubikloadpack.com
--- Comment #1 from UbikLoadPack support <su...@ubikloadpack.com> ---
Created attachment 35914
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35914&action=edit
Patch implementing option 1
As per dev mailing list discussion:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hello,
In some applications, the request body needs to be gzipped.
It is currently possible to do it by developping a JSR223 PreProcessor but it
requires some development knowledge.
We would like to contribute a patch to provide this but have some questions on
what best options would be:
Option 1 :Should it be automatic, ie, whenever a Header
Content-Encoding=gzip , we do it:
Easy
To disable it, remove Content-Encoding header
Is there a case where it would be annoying ?
We would add a property to disable registration of this Interceptor to
disable globally the feature if really needed
Option 2 :Should it be activated by a checkbox in HTTP Request Advanced Tab
?
Yet Another option in a complex UI ?
Option 3 : Should it be a PreProcessor ?:
More flexible
but requires insertions in many places
Unless there is a case we would go for Option 1.
Any thoughts ?
Thanks
Regards
UbikLoadPack Team
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.