You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by tr...@apache.org on 2010/08/24 13:13:14 UTC

svn commit: r988483 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Author: trawick
Date: Tue Aug 24 11:13:14 2010
New Revision: 988483

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988483&view=rev
Log:
fix some bogus rev numbers pointed out by niq

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=988483&r1=988482&r2=988483&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Tue Aug 24 11:13:14 2010
@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
     PR: 48939
     Trunk patches: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930125&view=rev
                    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930254&view=rev
-                   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=951900&view=rev
-                   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987379&view=rev
+                   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986090&view=rev
+                   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=962972&view=rev
                    http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=987359&view=rev
     2.2.x patch: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25923
       plus this CHANGES entry:



Re: svn commit: r988483 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com>.
On 24 Aug 2010, at 12:13, trawick@apache.org wrote:

> Author: trawick
> Date: Tue Aug 24 11:13:14 2010
> New Revision: 988483
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988483&view=rev
> Log:
> fix some bogus rev numbers pointed out by niq

My +1 for the 2.2.x patch stands - which is what matters.  However:

> +                   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=986090&view=rev

looks to me like another bogus rev: it's not part of this backport proposal
and I haven't reviewed it.

-- 
Nick Kew