You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> on 2019/10/21 02:39:46 UTC
Re: Watermarks not propagated to WebUI?
The issue persists with 1.9.1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14470
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 1:47 AM Jan Lukavský <je...@seznam.cz> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I'd very much love to, but because I run my pipeline with Beam, I'm
> afraid I will have to wait a little longer, before Beam has runner for
> 1.9 [1]. I'm pretty sure that the watermarks disappeared with overall
> parallelism (over all operators) something above 2000. There was quite a
> lot of operators (shuffling), so the individual parallelism of each
> operator was about 200. The pipeline was spread over 50 taskmanager
> (each having 4 slots).
>
> Jan
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/9296/
>
> On 8/26/19 10:23 AM, Robert Metzger wrote:
> > Jan, will you be able to test this issue on the now-released Flink 1.9
> > with the new UI?
> >
> > What parallelism is needed to reproduce the issue?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:59 PM Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org
> > <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >
> > I remember an issue regarding the watermark fetch request from the
> > WebUI
> > exceeding some HTTP size limit, since it tries to fetch all
> > watermarks
> > at once, and the format of this request isn't exactly efficient.
> >
> > Querying metrics for individual operators still works since the
> > request
> > is small enough.
> >
> > Not sure whether we ever fixed that.
> >
> > On 15/08/2019 12:01, Jan Lukavský wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thomas, thanks for confirming this. I have noticed, that in 1.9 the
> > > WebUI has been reworked a lot, does anyone know if this is still an
> > > issue? I currently cannot easily try 1.9, so I cannot confirm or
> > > disprove that.
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > On 8/14/19 6:25 PM, Thomas Weise wrote:
> > >> I have also noticed this issue (Flink 1.5, Flink 1.8), and it
> > appears
> > >> with
> > >> higher parallelism.
> > >>
> > >> This can be confusing to the user when watermarks actually work
> > and
> > >> can be
> > >> observed using the metrics.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 7:36 AM Jan Lukavský <je.ik@seznam.cz
> > <ma...@seznam.cz>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> is it possible, that watermarks are sometimes not propagated
> > to WebUI,
> > >>> although they are internally moving as normal? I see in WebUI
> > every
> > >>> operator showing "No Watermark", but outputs seem to be
> > propagated to
> > >>> sink (and there are watermark sensitive operations involved -
> e.g.
> > >>> reductions on fixed windows without early emitting). More
> > strangely,
> > >>> this happens when I increase parallelism above some threshold.
> > If I use
> > >>> parallelism of N, watermarks are shown, when I increase it
> > above some
> > >>> number (seems not to be exactly deterministic), watermarks
> > seems to
> > >>> disappear.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm using Flink 1.8.1.
> > >>>
> > >>> Did anyone experience something like this before?
> > >>>
> > >>> Jan
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>