[jira] Commented: (CXF-1275) System property -Dcxf.config.file has no effect

["Gary Tully (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550077 ] 

Gary Tully commented on CXF-1275:
---------------------------------

I think the fix for #CXF-1260 will not help. The resolution of config in ConfigureImpl is unnecessary. The BusApplicationContext does the real work.

I think you need to use the URL version to specify the config file:
 -Dcxf.config.file.url=classpath:META-INF/cxf.xml 

Gary.


> System property -Dcxf.config.file has no effect
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-1275
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.3
>            Reporter: Ralf Taugerbeck
>
> I would like to specify a custom cxf configuration file to my client application (e.g. META-INF/cxf.xml), but the system property -Dcxf.config.file obviously has no effect.
> Because the default constructor of ConfigurerImpl passes the name of the default config file, the corresponding code in ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) is never executed:
>     public ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) {
>         if (null == cfgFile) {
>             cfgFile = System.getProperty(USER_CFG_FILE_PROPERTY_NAME);
>         }
>      ...
> Could you please modifiy the code of the default constructor to:
>     public ConfigurerImpl() {
>         this(null);
>     }
> or something equivalent? I'm not sure whether this issue is fixed by the #CXF-1260 patch.
> Thanks,
> Ralf

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.