You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2005/03/03 20:03:29 UTC
Moving to xmlbeans v2
I have geronimo running with xmlbeans v 2. I discovered 3 problems in
xmlbeans v2, one a blocker, for which I submitted a bug report and
patch
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-116
The other two problems have fairly simple workarounds.
Advantages of v2:
1. bug in namespace of reference to group fixed, simplifying our plan
schemas for env references
2. bug in unique key constraints fixed, allowing us to use the spec
ws-client schema unmodified
3. better handling of any elements, simplifying code in service-builder
for xml-attributes that uses an any element.
I would like to move to v2 as soon as possible to avoid trying to
maintain my patched version.
choices:
1. Move now, using a privately built copy of xmlbeans including my
patch.
2. Move as soon as XMLBEANS-116 is fixed in xmlbeans source using a
snapshot we build (unless xmlbeans is providing snapshots)
3. Move when the next beta including XMLBEANS-116 is released.
Comments?
I'd prefer 1, 2, and 3 in that order.
thanks
david jencks
Re: Moving to xmlbeans v2
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <jl...@apache.org>.
David Jencks wrote:
> Advantages of v2:
>
> 1. bug in namespace of reference to group fixed, simplifying our plan
> schemas for env references
> 2. bug in unique key constraints fixed, allowing us to use the spec
> ws-client schema unmodified
> 3. better handling of any elements, simplifying code in service-builder
> for xml-attributes that uses an any element.
>
> I would like to move to v2 as soon as possible to avoid trying to
> maintain my patched version.
>
> choices:
>
> 1. Move now, using a privately built copy of xmlbeans including my patch.
+1
> 2. Move as soon as XMLBEANS-116 is fixed in xmlbeans source using a
> snapshot we build (unless xmlbeans is providing snapshots)
> 3. Move when the next beta including XMLBEANS-116 is released.
>
> Comments?
>
> I'd prefer 1, 2, and 3 in that order.
If you're confident it works fine I don't see a reason to wait. The
trouble is to maintain the home-made version, but it's your choice,
isn't it? ;)
> david jencks
Jacek
Re: Moving to xmlbeans v2
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@4quarters.com>.
On Mar 3, 2005, at 11:03 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I have geronimo running with xmlbeans v 2. I discovered 3 problems in
> xmlbeans v2, one a blocker, for which I submitted a bug report and
> patch
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-116
>
> The other two problems have fairly simple workarounds.
>
> Advantages of v2:
>
> 1. bug in namespace of reference to group fixed, simplifying our plan
> schemas for env references
> 2. bug in unique key constraints fixed, allowing us to use the spec
> ws-client schema unmodified
> 3. better handling of any elements, simplifying code in
> service-builder for xml-attributes that uses an any element.
>
> I would like to move to v2 as soon as possible to avoid trying to
> maintain my patched version.
+1
>
> choices:
>
> 1. Move now, using a privately built copy of xmlbeans including my
> patch.
> 2. Move as soon as XMLBEANS-116 is fixed in xmlbeans source using a
> snapshot we build (unless xmlbeans is providing snapshots)
> 3. Move when the next beta including XMLBEANS-116 is released.
>
> Comments?
>
> I'd prefer 1, 2, and 3 in that order.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org