You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org> on 2010/10/05 17:15:00 UTC
Release 1.0.2
I think it we have enough bug fixes and such in 1.0.2, so we should
release it without waiting on 1.1 (I think we are close on 1.1 but I
want to save that discussion for another thread.)
If people are happy with the content of 1.0.2 it should be easy enough to roll.
Chris
--
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couch.io
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Matthew Sinclair-Day <ms...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/15/10 at 7:11 PM, jan@apache.org (Jan Lehnardt) wrote:
>
> Looking at the issue list tagged for 1.0.2, I didn't see any mention of
> fixes for chunked encoding and other things around HTTP protocol support.
> Are those fixes going to be in 1.0.2?
If you're referring to the replication issues, yes.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-491
>
> Matt
>
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Matthew Sinclair-Day <ms...@gmail.com>.
On 11/15/10 at 7:11 PM, jan@apache.org (Jan Lehnardt) wrote:
>On 12 Nov 2010, at 20:21, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:06, Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> and done
>>
>>Oh, look, I'm back for more nagging! How are we doing on 1.0.2? Or
>>1.1, for that matter, just any release that gets me the good stuff
>>you've all been working on.
>
>JIRA lists a few open issues for 1.0.2:
>
>http://s.apache.org/couchdb-open-issues-1.0.2
>
>I started going through and closed / applied / deferred a few to my
>best judgement, but if you (everybody here) could help me squashing
>this list, we'll be good.
>
>Likewise, if you think any issue not on this list should be considered,
>set its "Fix Version" to "1.0.2" so we can have a look.
>
>Other than that, NEWS & CHANGES need to be updated, if anyone wants to
>tackle this.
>
>Cheers
>Jan
Looking at the issue list tagged for 1.0.2, I didn't see any
mention of fixes for chunked encoding and other things around
HTTP protocol support. Are those fixes going to be in 1.0.2?
Matt
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 12 Nov 2010, at 20:21, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:06, Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> and done
>
> Oh, look, I'm back for more nagging! How are we doing on 1.0.2? Or
> 1.1, for that matter, just any release that gets me the good stuff
> you've all been working on.
JIRA lists a few open issues for 1.0.2:
http://s.apache.org/couchdb-open-issues-1.0.2
I started going through and closed / applied / deferred a few to my
best judgement, but if you (everybody here) could help me squashing
this list, we'll be good.
Likewise, if you think any issue not on this list should be considered,
set its "Fix Version" to "1.0.2" so we can have a look.
Other than that, NEWS & CHANGES need to be updated, if anyone wants to
tackle this.
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Tim Smith <ti...@couchone.com>.
Adam, and everyone,
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Adam Kocoloski <ko...@apache.org> wrote:
> If you're referring to the COUCHDB-767 discussion, I don't think it was ever resolved. I don't want to revert the patch unless there is an operating system somewhere on which it actually results in reduced durability.
I agree, and I haven't been able to produce, or seen evidence of, an
actual durability problem. Icky or not, I've not found any mud to
sling at it that actually sticks.
Tim
--
www.couchone.com Your data. Anywhere.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Adam Kocoloski <ko...@apache.org>.
If you're referring to the COUCHDB-767 discussion, I don't think it was ever resolved. I don't want to revert the patch unless there is an operating system somewhere on which it actually results in reduced durability. I agree that it's icky to be relying on a property of fsync() that is apparently not guaranteed by any specification, but it sucks to block readers just to flush disk buffers.
As an aside, I'm having trouble reconciling Tso's statement in http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg21388.html with the following from SUS v2:
> The fsync() function forces all currently queued I/O operations associated with the file indicated by file descriptor fildes to the synchronised I/O completion state.
It doesn't say I/O operations associated with the file descriptor, it says I/O operations associated with the file. But far be it from me to question his interpretation of the spec; he's written more filesystems than I've used in production. Best,
Adam
On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
> I'm a little late to this party.
>
> The discussion about reverting a commit that may have interfered without
> fsync guarantees, did that go in for 1.0.2?
>
> That's an important bug that I would like to see in 1.0.2.
>
> -Mikeal
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Filipe David Manana
> <fd...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> I'm totally +1 on 1.0.2 asap.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:06, Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>> and done
>>>
>>> Oh, look, I'm back for more nagging! How are we doing on 1.0.2? Or
>>> 1.1, for that matter, just any release that gets me the good stuff
>>> you've all been working on.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dirkjan
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Filipe David Manana,
>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>
>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Mikeal Rogers <mi...@gmail.com>.
I'm a little late to this party.
The discussion about reverting a commit that may have interfered without
fsync guarantees, did that go in for 1.0.2?
That's an important bug that I would like to see in 1.0.2.
-Mikeal
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Filipe David Manana
<fd...@apache.org>wrote:
> I'm totally +1 on 1.0.2 asap.
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:06, Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> and done
> >
> > Oh, look, I'm back for more nagging! How are we doing on 1.0.2? Or
> > 1.1, for that matter, just any release that gets me the good stuff
> > you've all been working on.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dirkjan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
I'm totally +1 on 1.0.2 asap.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:06, Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> and done
>
> Oh, look, I'm back for more nagging! How are we doing on 1.0.2? Or
> 1.1, for that matter, just any release that gets me the good stuff
> you've all been working on.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 18:06, Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
> and done
Oh, look, I'm back for more nagging! How are we doing on 1.0.2? Or
1.1, for that matter, just any release that gets me the good stuff
you've all been working on.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
and done
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Seems fine to me.
> Doing it in a few minutes.
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 3 Nov 2010, at 12:13, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>>
>>> The bug was confirmed by Chandru, and he has already a fix for the
>>> next Ibrowse version (not yet on github or public elsewhere).
>>> According to him, it shouldn't take more than 1 or 2 days to add it to
>>> Ibrowse's public github repository.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
>>
>> What do you think about just applying your patch to the current version
>> of iBrowse instead of updating to a new version shortly before a CouchDB
>> release to ensure it doesn't introduce new issues? — We can then update
>> iBrowse in trunk after branching 1.1.x.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> I agree, let's wait for this one.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Jan
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> On 2 Nov 2010, at 21:56, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, I'm now -1 on releasing 1.0.2.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've found today a serious issue in ibrowse 2.0 (branch 1.0.x and
>>>>> trunk). I created a patch and a ticket at github:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to wait for an approval from Chandru (ibrowse's author)
>>>>> before patching our ibrowse version. Hopefully it won't take more than
>>>>> 1 or 2 days.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Filipe David Manana
>>>>> <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:12, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> How did that go? :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jan said it was okay for me to continue my apparently weekly nagging
>>>>>>> for 1.0.2, so consider yourselves nagged.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dirkjan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>>>>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>>>>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>>>>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>>>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>>>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>>>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>>
>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
Seems fine to me.
Doing it in a few minutes.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 3 Nov 2010, at 12:13, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>
>> The bug was confirmed by Chandru, and he has already a fix for the
>> next Ibrowse version (not yet on github or public elsewhere).
>> According to him, it shouldn't take more than 1 or 2 days to add it to
>> Ibrowse's public github repository.
>>
>> https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
>
> What do you think about just applying your patch to the current version
> of iBrowse instead of updating to a new version shortly before a CouchDB
> release to ensure it doesn't introduce new issues? — We can then update
> iBrowse in trunk after branching 1.1.x.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I agree, let's wait for this one.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Jan
>>> --
>>>
>>> On 2 Nov 2010, at 21:56, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, I'm now -1 on releasing 1.0.2.
>>>>
>>>> I've found today a serious issue in ibrowse 2.0 (branch 1.0.x and
>>>> trunk). I created a patch and a ticket at github:
>>>>
>>>> http://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
>>>>
>>>> I would like to wait for an approval from Chandru (ibrowse's author)
>>>> before patching our ibrowse version. Hopefully it won't take more than
>>>> 1 or 2 days.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Filipe David Manana
>>>> <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:12, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> How did that go? :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jan said it was okay for me to continue my apparently weekly nagging
>>>>>> for 1.0.2, so consider yourselves nagged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dirkjan
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>>>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>>>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>>>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>>>
>>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Filipe David Manana,
>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>
>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 3 Nov 2010, at 12:13, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> The bug was confirmed by Chandru, and he has already a fix for the
> next Ibrowse version (not yet on github or public elsewhere).
> According to him, it shouldn't take more than 1 or 2 days to add it to
> Ibrowse's public github repository.
>
> https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
What do you think about just applying your patch to the current version
of iBrowse instead of updating to a new version shortly before a CouchDB
release to ensure it doesn't introduce new issues? — We can then update
iBrowse in trunk after branching 1.1.x.
Cheers
Jan
--
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I agree, let's wait for this one.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>>
>> On 2 Nov 2010, at 21:56, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately, I'm now -1 on releasing 1.0.2.
>>>
>>> I've found today a serious issue in ibrowse 2.0 (branch 1.0.x and
>>> trunk). I created a patch and a ticket at github:
>>>
>>> http://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
>>>
>>> I would like to wait for an approval from Chandru (ibrowse's author)
>>> before patching our ibrowse version. Hopefully it won't take more than
>>> 1 or 2 days.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Filipe David Manana
>>> <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:12, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> How did that go? :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan said it was okay for me to continue my apparently weekly nagging
>>>>> for 1.0.2, so consider yourselves nagged.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dirkjan
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>>>
>>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>>
>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
The bug was confirmed by Chandru, and he has already a fix for the
next Ibrowse version (not yet on github or public elsewhere).
According to him, it shouldn't take more than 1 or 2 days to add it to
Ibrowse's public github repository.
https://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> I agree, let's wait for this one.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
> On 2 Nov 2010, at 21:56, Filipe David Manana wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I'm now -1 on releasing 1.0.2.
>>
>> I've found today a serious issue in ibrowse 2.0 (branch 1.0.x and
>> trunk). I created a patch and a ticket at github:
>>
>> http://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
>>
>> I would like to wait for an approval from Chandru (ibrowse's author)
>> before patching our ibrowse version. Hopefully it won't take more than
>> 1 or 2 days.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Filipe David Manana
>> <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:12, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> How did that go? :)
>>>>
>>>> Jan said it was okay for me to continue my apparently weekly nagging
>>>> for 1.0.2, so consider yourselves nagged.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Dirkjan
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Filipe David Manana,
>>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>>
>>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Filipe David Manana,
>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>
>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
I agree, let's wait for this one.
Cheers
Jan
--
On 2 Nov 2010, at 21:56, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> Unfortunately, I'm now -1 on releasing 1.0.2.
>
> I've found today a serious issue in ibrowse 2.0 (branch 1.0.x and
> trunk). I created a patch and a ticket at github:
>
> http://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
>
> I would like to wait for an approval from Chandru (ibrowse's author)
> before patching our ibrowse version. Hopefully it won't take more than
> 1 or 2 days.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Filipe David Manana
> <fd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:12, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> How did that go? :)
>>>
>>> Jan said it was okay for me to continue my apparently weekly nagging
>>> for 1.0.2, so consider yourselves nagged.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dirkjan
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Filipe David Manana,
>> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>>
>> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
>> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
>> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
Unfortunately, I'm now -1 on releasing 1.0.2.
I've found today a serious issue in ibrowse 2.0 (branch 1.0.x and
trunk). I created a patch and a ticket at github:
http://github.com/cmullaparthi/ibrowse/issues/#issue/17
I would like to wait for an approval from Chandru (ibrowse's author)
before patching our ibrowse version. Hopefully it won't take more than
1 or 2 days.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Filipe David Manana
<fd...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:12, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> How did that go? :)
>>
>> Jan said it was okay for me to continue my apparently weekly nagging
>> for 1.0.2, so consider yourselves nagged.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dirkjan
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Filipe David Manana,
> fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
>
> "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
> Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
> That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:12, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>> How did that go? :)
>
> Jan said it was okay for me to continue my apparently weekly nagging
> for 1.0.2, so consider yourselves nagged.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 15:12, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> How did that go? :)
Jan said it was okay for me to continue my apparently weekly nagging
for 1.0.2, so consider yourselves nagged.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 11 Oct 2010, at 14:17, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I am waiting for consensus, and a nudge from a committer. :)
>
> If you wait a bit, I might have a 1 line patch for 1.0.x :)
How did that go? :)
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I am waiting for consensus, and a nudge from a committer. :)
If you wait a bit, I might have a 1 line patch for 1.0.x :)
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 11 Oct 2010, at 08:13, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 17:15, Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I think it we have enough bug fixes and such in 1.0.2, so we should
>> release it without waiting on 1.1 (I think we are close on 1.1 but I
>> want to save that discussion for another thread.)
>>
>> If people are happy with the content of 1.0.2 it should be easy enough to roll.
>
> Any progress here?
I am waiting for consensus, and a nudge from a committer. :)
Re: Release 1.0.2
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 17:15, Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think it we have enough bug fixes and such in 1.0.2, so we should
> release it without waiting on 1.1 (I think we are close on 1.1 but I
> want to save that discussion for another thread.)
>
> If people are happy with the content of 1.0.2 it should be easy enough to roll.
Any progress here?
Cheers,
Dirkjan