You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by ph...@apache.org on 2014/04/24 14:25:55 UTC

svn commit: r1589692 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c

Author: philip
Date: Thu Apr 24 12:25:55 2014
New Revision: 1589692

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1589692
Log:
* subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c
  (do_out_of_date_check): Typo in comment, no code change.

Modified:
    subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c

Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c?rev=1589692&r1=1589691&r2=1589692&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c (original)
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c Thu Apr 24 12:25:55 2014
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ do_out_of_date_check(dav_resource_combin
          properties changed since the BASE version.
 
          ### I think svn_fs_node_relation() checks for more changes than we
-             should check for here. Needs further review. But it looks like\
+             should check for here. Needs further review. But it looks like
              this check matches the checks in the libsvn_fs commit editor.
 
              For now I would say reporting out of date in a few too many